My Hypothetical Universe

My hypothesis, claiming the Big Bang theory is bs:

I'll start with the Earth and moon. I could go to an atom, but it's not necessary.

The moon orbits the Earth. The Earth orbits the sun. The solar system (SS) orbits the galaxy. The galaxy orbits...

...something that hasn't been named, as far as I know anyway. Here I'll call it G2.

I'm sure someone thought of it, and maybe wrote it down somewhere, but I can't find it....the Big Bang is too prevalent in the science community, so if it's out there it's in a dark corner, probably with an inch of dust on it lol.

My hypothesis continues:

The G2 orbits the G3. The G4 orbits G5...etc. etc. etc., most likely for infinity.

That's the basics of it, now for support, and additional hypotheses:

I hypothesize that the "universe" as they call it is actually called the "known universe" and the distinction is important. My hypothesis claims that the known universe is a segment of G2. This is supported by the notion of a "flat universe", as they call it, though that is contentious. I'm saying all of the known universe is part of G2, whatever they choose to call it. They call it the "universe", I call it a segment of G2.

They say the "universe" is about 14 billion years old. I disagree. In my hypothesis, I choose to say infinity. Let's be clear here, no one will ever know the truth on this, but infinity is most likely the truth.

A prediction:

I just checked how many times our solar system has traveled around the galaxy, in order to do a rough calculation on how many times the known universe has orbited the G2. My preliminary guess was less than a degree of rotation in 5 billion years. Maybe a few degrees in 100 billion years. Maybe a few degrees in a trillion years. Yes, it's that big.

I thought it (SS orbit of galaxy) was once or twice in 5 to 7 billion years, but was wrong. They (whoever) says it's around 20 to 25 times in 5 billion years.

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090107183001AAa0gqX

Knowing it takes one year for the Earth to orbit once around the sun, and 5 billion years for the SS to orbit 20 to 25 times around the galaxy, an orbit of the galaxy (and the "universe") around G2 would likely take 2,000,000,000,000,000,000 or so years. That number is completely inaccurate lol...mathematicians can figure it out if they want to, the point being it's a ridiculously long time. In any case, I believe my preliminary guess is sound, in that we have not even traveled a degree around G2 in 5 billions years time. Think about that, and move on to G3. Now try G4. G5. Etc.

Honestly, I don't care about a Nobel (but the money is a different story), all I really want is for that idiotic Big Bang theory to die lol...I view it Looney Toons style, since I was a kid when they told me about it, and the logo that pops up in the beginning of a cartoon is just like what I think about the Big Bang. Both start from a point, and both are cartoonish.

Well, I don't think any of you can't grasp the concepts above, but do you believe me now? Do you believe the Big Bang is a failed theory? I hope so, and I hope the scientific community does too.

 

Backing away slowly.... Slowly.... Turning.... Turning..... Running!!!!!!

 

You'll take the time for this foolishness but you won't take 2 minutes to Google some help for those teeth of yours?

 

The galaxy doesn't rotate at all. How do we know this? Because we can watch neighboring galaxy's in the universe and see they don't change location, other than moving away at determined speed. Which, by the way, was the basis for the Big Bang theory....the fact that other galaxy's were found to be moving away all at the same speed, like ripples in a pond.

Now I suppose if someone came up with a better theory that didn't involve magical beings creating everything from willpower and such, I might consider it, but to date I haven't heard of a better theory.

 

That is uncalled for. I took the time to kill a theory that should never have been born, and all you do is be an asshole. GO FUCK YOURSELF.

 

The galaxy does rotate, as it is much like a solar system in that way.

There is a large center mass that everything else in the galaxy rotates around. This is easy to prove. We can plot all (or most?) of the stars (other solar systems) individually on a map. Once all those are plotted, the galactic system becomes obvious.

But, if I can't get you to see that, there is no way in hell that you could see what I'm saying about all that we can see, that everything we can see from Earth orbits a system that I call G2.

No worries though, and thank you for an opinion that doesn't make a personal attack on me, an incorrect personal attack at that.

 

I reported you for an unwarranted personal attack.

It's a lie, and I've addressed your concerns elsewhere, yet you choose to ignore that fact and continue to pursue a personal attack strategy that states your incorrect argument again.

You should know better than that. I gave you no reason to pursue personal attacks, yet you continue with them. Shame on you.

 

I think it's Nobel-worthy, which invalidates the David-head's assertion that I am a lazy person, too sorry for myself to do anything about my dilemma, a dilemma that contains serious, serious consequences for my future. He is a symptom of a republican party that is out of touch with humanity.

 

I typed that wrong. Yes, the galaxy rotates on an axis. What I was trying to get at is that it doesn't then revolve around something else, like the earth to the sun.

 

Wait until you see my topic in the religion thread. Little Davy will probably side with the dinosaur-riding folks.

 

That I can accept. I disagree, of course. I contend that there is a misunderstanding, a misinterpretation of data in support of the Big Bang. I claim that the data can be applied to my model.

 

Oh no!! Please tell me you didn't "report" me...please, please, please...(dripping with sarcasm)
So, please tell us, why you would (as you claim) sit around for years suffering from bad teeth & a series of heart attacks (which casued all the woes that have befallen you) when a simple Google search easily turns up multiple resources avaialble to someone in your condition. Are you that stupid & lazy or were you lying?

 

David, you are not an idiot in most things, but in this you are being totally idiotic.

Let me put it this way: Thank you for the heart attacks.

 

I reported you for an unwarranted personal attack.

It's a lie, and I've addressed your concerns elsewhere, yet you choose to ignore that fact and continue to pursue a personal attack strategy that states your incorrect argument again.

You should know better than that. I gave you no reason to pursue personal attacks, yet you continue with them. Shame on you.

 

I reported you for an unwarranted personal attack.

It's a lie, and I've addressed your concerns elsewhere, yet you choose to ignore that fact and continue to pursue a personal attack strategy that states your incorrect argument again.

You should know better than that. I gave you no reason to pursue personal attacks, yet you continue with them. Shame on you.

 

Be my guest. Dick.

 

Learn the means to prevent yourself from double-posting. That requires thought. Good luck.

 

I'll not address any further comments from Dick and David, for an unspecified period of time. They have joined Coin in ignorance, as such, via the principles of yin-yang, they are now ignored.

People can choose heaven, or they can choose hell. They made their choice, and are in hell. I chose mine, and I am in heaven.

Until they can be reasonable, until they can be rational, and use those tools for the good instead of the bad, they can go fuck themselves.

 

Really?

 

I reported you for an unwarranted personal attack.

It's a lie, and I've addressed your concerns elsewhere, yet you choose to ignore that fact and continue to pursue a personal attack strategy that states your incorrect argument again.

You should know better than that. I gave you no reason to pursue personal attacks, yet you continue with them. Shame on you.

BTW, My previous posts were not a double save that you had an "unwarranted personal attack" in two different posts.