911 debate

Discussion in 'Chatter' started by tomcorona, Sep 14, 2009.

  1. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Clown Hater

    Once they lie, they have no credibility, and no reason to read on. I make an exception for you because I consider making you look foolish my second hobby.
     
  2. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Clown Hater

    I am not the one with an agenda other than to stop yours.
     
  3. tomcorona

    tomcorona Anti republican truther


    "Once they lie"......thank you for saying the Govt's story isn't credible..
     
  4. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Clown Hater

    We both know I was talking about the idiots on the religious site, but thanks again for showing your true character.

    And by the way, I have admitted that the government lied about many things that happened that day. Lying about their incompetence does not equate to the government being responsible for the attack. No matter how much you hate the government and how much you want it to be true, Islamic terrorists are responsible for 9/11.
     
  5. tomcorona

    tomcorona Anti republican truther

    Good...so you agree.. we don't know the truth..that's a step Thurston..one at a time..
     
  6. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Clown Hater

    I admitted that over 400 posts ago. You were so busy posting your propaganda, you must have missed it.
     
  7. tomcorona

    tomcorona Anti republican truther

    My mistake Thurston...your generic brand of ignorance must have confused me..
     
  8. tomcorona

    tomcorona Anti republican truther

    First responders witness testimony LOTS

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1855050994689354420&sourceid=docidfeed&hl=en#
     
  9. tomcorona

    tomcorona Anti republican truther

    Hilarious...I start out saying that we need a real investigation..I was baited, I'm guessing, to provide explanations...When I do or reference folks who can, then they're critiqued for suggesting "crazy truther" conspiracies. Watch which cup has the ball....nope...it's this one....nope maybe under here..
    The disinformation lemmings hard at work..
     
  10. Drusus

    Drusus New Member

    That video offers no proof of any consipiracy. Again...you have provided nothing of any substance to back any claim and you yourself have no connection with it and no inside information, you know no more than anyone else. If you want them to investigate more, thats fine...but you do so without any reason but your own doubts and other doubts others have raised, again, with little proof or intimate knowledge. I have honestly listened to people like you just to see if there was anything being said that one could grab onto as factual...a lot of possibles, a lot of it could happen...Just the fact that you think the US populace trusts their government makes me think you dont have a clear grasp.
     
  11. tomcorona

    tomcorona Anti republican truther

    What does that video suggest to you? Anything?
     
  12. tomcorona

    tomcorona Anti republican truther


    What would constitute a "grip"? One post in here suggested that the government's lying to cover their incompetence. That what you mean?
    So...concluding that the government was incompetent (and where would be the 'proof' of that which apologists always demand from the truthers?), and then basically excusing their own unproven supposition, for what reason? Fear? Ignorance? An agenda? It has to be one of those three. One assumes unproven suppositions, and then apologizes/excuses them in one felt swoop constitutes "trust" IMHO. They "trust" that their lies are excusable. I think I have a pretty good "grip" on reality, and most certainly the events of that day.
    Also...please tell me what you would consider as "proof", and maybe what it is specifically that you think noone can prove? Would would that be? Anything?
    Please tell me, if you can, what you would accept as "proof" and I will find it and post it. (since apparently many aren't capable of finding it themselves). Be specific...an interview w/a witness? Someone's name that maybe you would accept? I submit that you wouldn't accept anything anyway because you're mind is already made up for at least one of the reasons I described above.
     
  13. tomcorona

    tomcorona Anti republican truther


    Remember....ONCE THEY LIE..we have to through the WHOLE THING OUT, as this poster would suggest. Right?
    So whether we're talking about the government, or anybody else, the standard is the same...correct?
     
  14. tomcorona

    tomcorona Anti republican truther

    Won't post an answer cause there ISN'T anything you WOULD accept. How am I supposed to find anything to provide proof that meets your standards when you can't even THINK of what it would be. But you'll make all the leaps needed to to arrive at your own faulty beliefs.
     
  15. tomcorona

    tomcorona Anti republican truther

    Again, ignore rather than answer, or have to admit that your standards of proof really don't mean anything at all (other than it being a quick lemming type of response).
     
  16. tomcorona

    tomcorona Anti republican truther

    An honest proclamation...
     
  17. tomcorona

    tomcorona Anti republican truther

    So the "once they lie" isn't applicable to the Gov?? or would it be just selective enforcement?
     
  18. tomcorona

    tomcorona Anti republican truther

    and that was neutralized...how?
     
  19. tomcorona

    tomcorona Anti republican truther

    What does the video represent to you? I guess they folks that appeared in the film are liars too huh? No credibility there huh?
     
  20. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Clown Hater

    Tom,

    Can you just wait for an answer, my god man. I worked all day and played poker all night. My life doesn't revolve around this stupid debate with you, there is no money in it.

    And yes, that standard certainly applies to the government. Please be warned that I know where you are going with this and if you do, I will be forced once again to make you look foolish.

    Paul
     

Share This Page