Why is that dumb? The successful procreation of the species depends upon males and females mating. Homosexuality is in direct contradiction with genetics and evolution. However, if you would rather classify it as a genetic defect than a lifestyle choice, I have no problem with that. BTW, don't take what I just said personally. In my eyes Craig, the state of Louisiana gets a free pass when it comes to criticizing the federal government. First Katrina, now this debacle. At least they have the Saints to keep their morale up! Perhaps instead of trying to make a ridiculous political point, you could just sympathize with the people who live in that state.
I believe that is common knowledge I forgot, talk s-l-o-w-l-y to craiga this late in the day. Personal freedom is what I'm talking about. Why should one be forced into this healthcare scam if they don't want to be. Can you answer me that?
And saying that Louisiana have the Saints to keep up their morale is dumb also. And the fact is an oil rig explosion is NOT a natural disaster. And do you really think that homosexuality is a choice and not a predetermination?
After that statement, I don't think you have ever met anybody from New Orleans. The Saints are beloved in that city, by everybody. Natural Disaster, man made disaster, it really makes no difference to those suffering from the effects. I have never researched the causes of homosexuality so I really don't know. What I do know is that it is not normal. If it were, the survival of the species would be at risk. Therefore, it is my belief that it is either a genetic defect or a choice. Why are you so hell bent on the homosexuality issue?
How can one refute what you write? You are saying that EVERYBODY from New Orleans is a Saints fan. So it must be true. Not everything Louisiana centers on New Orleans. I dont give a crap about homosexuality. David said it was a choice. And he claims over and over and over to be well educated and have friends who are in the medical profession. So he must know that it isnt a choice. Or at least heard form his medical friends that it may well be predetermined. He made the statement. I asked him about it and he skirts(no pun intended) the issue.
Oh, look at that double talk. A minute ago, it was predetermined and you said it like it was 100% certainty. Now you use the phrase "may well be predetermined" because you really have no idea and are talking out of you butt like usual.
You recognize that speech pattern rather quickly. You have the credentials to comment on "talking out of you butt" or are you strictly speaking from experience?
Cut out the bickering Ladies, David again I will ask you as you mention it in this thread, were has President Obama said he wants to get rid of the US borders? I have to keep asking as you keep avoiding and yet repeating it? Are you simply telling a lie or do you have some proof? oh and the clip with the Mexican Prez sorry he never mentioned getting rid of borders in it
May well be predetermined with David's medical friends. Why are you so hostile? Why dont you look it up and see what the medical profession says about homosexuality. Its like four out of five say its predetermined. So I guess a few dont agree. But if it had to be ruled on, I guess the majority would win out. Are manners frowned upon in here now? You might find this amusung. I noticed with you if you make a statement and someone tries to correct you, you say,''Whats the difference?'. ''Natural disaster, mand-made, who cares?''. David does that too. It seems as long as you get a jab in, it doesnt matter if what you say in fact or not. So silly, really.
You know, you really need to re-read what it is that you are even arguing. Because I used the word "lifestyle" I'm somehow anti-gay? It doesn't matter to me if someone is born gay, becomes gay or denies they're gay. I don't have a problem with them...live & let live.
What a weak attempt at spin that post was. In your opinion, I am hostile, have no manners, and am silly for only wanting to get in a jab. Furthermore, you didn't correct me. I never said that an oil rig explosion and the resultant spill was a natural disaster. I simply stated that the State of Louisiana had to first endure Katrina, and now this debacle. You are the one who made the distinction about the type of disaster. I didn't make the distinction and don't care as evidenced by subsequent post. My comments were related to how the federal government handled the disasters. Whether the disaster was natural or man made is completely immaterial. So genius, are they not both disasters? Is this one less important because it was man made? Seems to me that you are the one more interested in making jabs than points. And if you are not, then could we kindly ask you to make a valid point before we all die.
Walmart...toilet repair department. Thought you already knew that. I don't make hydro-ceramic specialist until I service 300 dumpers.
