Could the fire burn down WTC?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by katsung47, Sep 8, 2012.

  1. katsung47

    katsung47 Well-Known Member

    [​IMG]

    picture compare with Madrid fire
     
  2. katsung47

    katsung47 Well-Known Member

    [​IMG]


    (10) Another reason that we know the fires were not as serious as claimed, is that there are photos of people in the impacted region after the planes hit the building (and before it collapsed). The above photos show at least two survivors of the impact and the initial jet-fuel fire.

    http://guardian.150m.com/wtc/small/not-so-hot.htm
     
  3. katsung47

    katsung47 Well-Known Member

  4. IQless1
    Blah

    IQless1 trump supporters are scum

    You speak Mandarin or Cantonese? Both? Just curious. No FBI involved. No conspiracy. Ignore the curtain that just moved.
     
  5. katsung47

    katsung47 Well-Known Member

  6. katsung47

    katsung47 Well-Known Member

    The original photo shows that the damage was a hole 2 ½ yards in diameter. Could the whole Boeing squeeze into it?



    [​IMG]


    THE EVIDENCE:

    One hole, 2 ½ yards in diameter

    Whatever hit the Pentagon on September 11, 2001 made a hole several meters wide in the front wall between the first and second floors. It emerged three blocks later, leaving behind a perfectly round hole of about 2 ½ yards in diameter.

    http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero14/missile/trou_en.htm
     
  7. katsung47

    katsung47 Well-Known Member

  8. katsung47

    katsung47 Well-Known Member

    Gen. Says Flt. 77 Did Not Hit Pentagon

     

Share This Page