Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Politics' started by JoeNation, Sep 21, 2021.
I can say exactly the same thing though.
It’s a question of integrity.
words don’t mean anything when your integrity is flawed
anyone who doesn't think the way you do doesn't have integrity. now you're flailing.
Without the Democrats, you wouldn't have the right to marry a same sex partner. You can still be fired in over 30 states just for being gay. Guess which states I am referring to? That is some incredible respect the Republicans have shown you. You side with your abusers. That is twisted.
Or simply Stockholm Syndrome.
My . . . struck a nerve, have I?
I happen to know you are supposed to be working full-time so many times that you post, while @StankyBoy is not.
You and he share little in the way of values, and I respect him a great deal for his longer range, bigger picture perspective. I’m not sure you can get there before you expire.
you're a moderator who takes sides. didn't see that one coming
Does JN’s posts here offend you also? Or, are you just fine with them?
I didn’t “take sides” FD, but you took advantage of your employer’s trust in their workers.
YOU are the very reason employers feel the need to surveil their workers.
YOU are the bad apple that ruins it for the rest.
YOU are a shining example of Liberal values and how they are undermining the greatness of this nation.
Total BS! Homosexuals have ALWAYS been able to marry.
Read the rules and figure it out.
And thanks for the reply TC.
wow, what a meltdown
But is it legally recognized?
I could marry a spider if I wanted to but would it be legally recognized?
"Same-sex marriage has been legally recognized in the U.S. state of Indiana since October 6, 2014. The state had previously restricted marriage to different-sex couples by statute in 1986. By legislation passed in 1997, it denied recognition to same-sex relationships established in other jurisdictions"
The issue isn't "marriage"...it's government benefits. The least you can do is to be honest. Why do Marxists always try to hide their meaning?
Take offense, if you want Clembo. Your “clean up” post was completely inappropriate. I was getting tired of what I was reading, and fired a return salvo. While you were definitely not excluded from my response, JN was the primary target of my FCJ comment because that was one of his favorite and regularly used comebacks at one time. You deserved the rebuke nonetheless.
This site is intended for political discourse, and not for sexual imagery, even if posted in words and left to the imagination. We are all supposed to be adults here . . . That doesn’t entitle us to post or imply pornography. On the contrary . . . it demands mature responses.
Therefore, I have gone back and edited my response.
The key phrase here is, "same sex". Stop trying to be cute. You're not that good at it.
Get off the Marxists thing would you Yak. Take JN's advise while you're at it.
Strange thing for stanky to "like"
Ok..."same sex partners" have ALWAYS been able to marry. Characterize that mental disability anyway you wish.
Folks can do as they please...as long as they stay within the extremely wide borders of the U.S. Constitution. Marxism, Sharia Law, etc are all social models that are incompatible with the U.S. Constitution. Get your happy azz back on the playing field and you'll never hear from me again.