What do you make of this little deception? `

Discussion in 'Politics' started by JoeNation, Nov 25, 2019.

  1. JoeNation

    JoeNation Patron Saint of Idiots

  2. SmalltownMN

    SmalltownMN Active Member

    Deception by whom?
  3. JohnHamilton

    JohnHamilton Well-Known Member

    Your “smoking gun” turned out to be a cap pistol. Sondland qualified his testimony by saying that it was his opinion or perception, which no more than what Schiff has been calling “facts” all along.
    LucyRay likes this.
  4. JoeNation

    JoeNation Patron Saint of Idiots

    Sondland qualified that he is not an attorney, but that he believed it was a quid pro quo, according to Luskin.
  5. Mopar Dude

    Mopar Dude Well-Known Member

    It's rather why I have been confused myself. I heard the statement he made and didn't understand why it was being carried as though it were a statement of fact.

Share This Page