Will Pelosi Ask The Pentagon To Limit Biden's Nuclear Access?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by CoinOKC, Nov 28, 2021.

  1. CoinOKC

    CoinOKC T R U M P - 2 0 2 4

    OK, let's talk about the elephant in the room. There's something mentally wrong with Biden. Anyone with eyesight can see this man is not firing on all cylinders.

    But, now I have to ask if Pelosi will ask the Pentagon to limit this unstable president's access to our nuclear codes. After all, she asked it of the Pentagon when Trump was president.


    In a letter to her Democratic House colleagues on Friday (January 8, 2021), Pelosi said that she had spoken with the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Mark Milley, about "available precautions for preventing an unstable president from initiating military hostilities or accessing the launch codes and ordering a nuclear strike."

    "The situation of this unhinged President," Pelosi wrote, "could not be more dangerous and we must do everything that we can to protect the American people from his unbalanced assault on our country and our democracy."


    I'm worried about Biden's faculties. He's obviously "unhinged and could not be more dangerous". Will Pelosi stand up for America and ask the Pentagon what can be done to limit Biden's nuclear access? Of course, there's nothing she can do about the president's ability to launch a nuclear strike, but being that Biden is unhinged, perhaps she could impeach him or attempt to get him removed via the 25th Amendment. Just sayin'.

  2. Mopar Dude

    Mopar Dude Well-Known Member

    In a word…. No….. They have the perfect puppet in place and she and her cronies are the puppeteers.
  3. CoinOKC

    CoinOKC T R U M P - 2 0 2 4

    Which, again, goes to show the hypocrisy of the Left.
    StankyBoy and Mopar Dude like this.
  4. ddddd

    ddddd Well-Known Member

    There was this early on:

    "Nearly three dozen House Democrats are urging President Joe Biden to relinquish his sole authority to order the launch of nuclear weapons, arguing that no single person should wield apocalyptic military power."

    but if you keep reading, they say it's not about Biden...

    ""The worry is not about Biden, but more about Trump or another future Trump-like president," said Stephen Young, who advocates on the dangers of nuclear weapons for the Union of Concerned Scientists. "

    Mopar Dude and CoinOKC like this.
  5. CoinOKC

    CoinOKC T R U M P - 2 0 2 4

    Yes, because Trump started so many nuclear wars.
    StankyBoy, Mopar Dude and ddddd like this.
  6. toughcoins

    toughcoins Rarely is the liberal viewpoint tainted by realism

    The President of the United states is Commander in Chief. If Biden in his dilapidated state wishes to involve others in calling the play with the football, that's his prerogative but, as with every other modern president, the sole responsibility for doing so is bestowed upon the new president immediately after inauguration. Without amending the Constitution, there's precious little hope of accomplishing what they seek.

    The House Democrats can urge all they want . . . liberals are all about urges anyway.
    ddddd likes this.
  7. StankyBoy

    StankyBoy Well-Known Member

    Trump was much more peaceful than any president in my lifetime. I mean, there’s only been 4 but still.
    CoinOKC likes this.

Share This Page