Scott Walker the Next Republican Governor to be Indicted

Are you saying they charged him as guilty? Well, actually, yes you did say that. Whatever that's supposed to mean. You must be a partner of the law firm of Dewey, Screwem and Howe.

 

But when the judges (plural, note) throw the case out, it would be very accurate that he has been proven innocent.

 

Actually, no. If a person is charged with a crime, a trial will reveal whether he is (a.) guilty or (b.) not guilty.

Whereas Walker has never been charged with a crime, it's impossible to say if he's guilty or not guilty. Since he was never charged and the case was thrown out before trial, it's simply a moot point to argue whether he was guilty or not guilty. But, in this country, we have a presumption of innocence. Therefore, we will have to presume that he is innocent.

 

Oh, but he has been charged;
MADISON, Wis., June 19 (UPI) --Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker and two top aides conspired to evade state election laws, state prosecutors charged in court documents unsealed Thursday.

Read more: http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2014...ign-finance-laws/2791403204636/#ixzz35DRjrqRQ

He has not been tried, but he was charged.

 

But, the word "charged" as used in this context simply means "allege" or "claim" by the prosecutors. It would have to be up to the appropriate legal entity (the District Attorney, the Attorney General, etc.) to actually bring any criminal complaint against Walker.

 

The email seems pretty damning and yes of course a trial will be necessary to prove either guilt or innocence. And as we all know, in this country it isn't whether you actually committed a crime or not, it's how much justice you can afford that matters. Because he is a republican, I'm just going to go with the odds here and assume guilt just like you guys assume everything Obama does is a crime and he is guilty. Not that you can admit such behavior but it is the fact none the less.

The point of this forum never has been truth, facts, or reality, it is.....

||
||
||
||
||
\/

 

I will not be going to trial because the judges have ruled it not prosecutable.

 

You've bored me with your un-American, National Socialist "guilty until proven innocent" rhetoric. If you hate American freedoms that much, why don't you go live in North Korea or some other country more aligned with your ideals?

 

I'll get right on that.

 

예. 당신은 공산주의 국가에있는 집에서 잘 될 것입니다.

 

So, you received all your talking points from some liberal, left-wing rag. No surprise there. Once again, you've been proven wrong about Walker. Here, let me repeat that in case you didn't hear the first fifty times I told you: You are WRONG!

Mainstream media forced to walk back Walker ‘criminal scheme’ narrative

June 27, 2014

After last week’s breathless headlines putting Gov. Scott Walker at the center of a nationwide “criminal scheme,” the mainstream and left-leaning media are being forced to step back from such sensational indictments.

The man doing the forcing is the special prosecutor who raised the specter of said conspiracy in a court document — part of 268 pages of previously sealed records dumped last week by order of a federal appeals court and embraced by John Doe prosecutors.

An attorney for Francis Schmitz, one of several prosecutors involved in the secret John Doe investigation into dozens of conservative groups, sent out a statement Thursday, clarifying that Walker was not a target of the investigation and at no time “has he been served with a subpoena.”

Attorney Randall Crocker’s statement comes exactly one week after the 7th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals’ unsealing of documents related to a civil rights lawsuit against the John Doe prosecutors. Within minutes the legacy media and left-leaning outlets were frothing about what Schmitz had described in a court document as an “expansive” investigation. Stories everywhere pushed a theme of Walker engaged in a “criminal scheme.”

Not true, Schmitz’s attorney said a week after the damage of widespread press coverage had been done.

“Contained in these documents is a reference to the request for production of documents that relates to an alleged criminal scheme. Gov. Walker’s name was included in this reference,” Crocker wrote in the statement carried in the Wisconsin State Journal.

Wait for it …

“While these documents outlined the prosecutor’s legal theory, they did not establish the existence of a crime; rather, they were arguments in support of further investigation to determine if criminal charges against any person or entity are warranted,” Crocker added.


http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...er-criminal-scheme-narrative/?intcmp=HPBucket

 

Honestly rlm your responses bore the living crap out of me anymore.

Democraps. How friggin' clever, predictable and childish can one get?

Not to mention beating the living snot of dead horses at the taxpayers expense.

 

Yep, that is what you are doing along with Mr. RB.

 

You just get the feeling that he is sitting in a wheelchair in a pair of soaked Depends with pureed food smeared on his face hating everyone different than himself.

 

Hey, Little Joe, the title of this thread has something to do with Scott Walker being indicted. Did that ever happen? While we're on the topic of indictment, what about your claim that Chris Christie was going to be indicted? We're still waiting. Are you just a knee-jerk reactionary or do you just not know how the law in this country works?

I'm through trying to explain it to you. Listen, I'll say this one more time: You are wrong about Scott Walker. Show us how he broke the law and when he was indicted for it. If you can't, then please shut your gaping, screeching, liberal pie-hole unless it's to utter the phrase, "I was wrong".

 

meh? ....time will tell.

If you have a real interest, here ya go.... http://scottwalkerwatch.com/

 

That's the dumbest thing you've ever said and you've said some very dumb things before.

"Meh? ... time will tell." LOL, that's a good one.

You also said that Walker broke the law. Please, tell us exactly how he did that. If so, has he been indicted?

I just loved it when you said that prosecutors "charged Walker as guilty" (whatever that's supposed to mean). I can't wait to hear your answer now. Come on, give us a good one.................

 

Meh!

 

Please show me where I've beaten a dead horse in this thread.