Most People In Survey Think Hillary Is A Liar

You bet! We used to believe and still believe that he and everyone is innocent until proven guilty. I realize that concept is to you 2 (or more?) who disregard the Constitution.

College? Your supposed environs keep expanding!

 

Oh how we notice!

What happened to Soros, Gates, Pelosi, Kerry, Steyer, Buffett, Bloomberg, etc.

 

You do the opposite to Hillary Clinton.

 

[QUOTE="..I'm also no Anita Hill..[/QUOTE]

Very clever! Ha ha! Good one!

 

They certainly don't on the Left. Hence, we got Obama in 2008/12.

 

...and a whole lot of people, actually. Obama, for one. Eric Holder, for another. Bubba, of course. Etc.

 

http://www.quinnipiac.edu/news-and-...y-poll/national/release-detail?ReleaseID=2274

 

Not really. I said she had classified document on her server not secured. That has been proven by both the State Department and the FBI. There is a law against having unsecured classified information that I have quoted for all to see. The conclusions are obvious.

On the other hand, you said that Zimmerman "chased-down" (never proven) and shot (obvious). Therefore he should be convicted (proven false) because big Zimmerman out-sized (proven false) the teenager, told the 911 operator he was black (but only when asked to describe the teenager), refused a legal order (proven false), and was not defending himself (proven false).

 

Decades of evidence contradicts that. You are currently accusing her of having a classified document on her server yet the thread of accusations originated with an accusation against the Obama administration for it's comments about the incident in Benghazi. That particular accusation involved a movie trailer that resulted in numerous deaths and injuries across the Middle East, Africa, Pakistan and Afghanistan. You, your party and other fools insists that the movie trailer had no impact on the events in Libya.

As for "not really", I point to the numerous times you've vilified Hillary Clinton, we could even go further back than Whitewater.

 

Actually, yeah it has. Zimmerman gave the specifics of it to the police shortly after the incident and much of that was used in his trial.

Deny it if you want to though.

 

Injustices occur.

 

I correctly assumed that Zimmerman shot Martin after Martin beat the snot out of him. I also said very early on that Zimmerman himself should not have been chasing Martin.

 

Would love to see that since I have only been here less than 9 years and you less than 5.

Sorry, but I am listening to the State Department and the FBI. You have no evidence to the contrary.

Again, I see the facts - the emails sent to her - saying they were not related.

Show me! "Both Zimmerman and Trayvon state in their respective phone calls, to dispatch and to Jeantel, that they have lost the other individual." Zimmerman never encountered Trayvon by chasing him. Period!

That is a definition of self defense.

 

Your hatred for Hillary Clinton existed prior to that. Whitewater was specifically mentioned.

That could only be true if you disregarded every accusation she has ever been subjected to, by you personally.

One reason for me bringing Trayvon Martin into the mix is that you completely ignored his right to be protected from people like George Zimmerman.

Again, you ignored the point, that you yourself have despised Hillary Clinton for decades and that your recent comments about her are the product of that hatred.

Your sense of reality is off....considerably. Again, Zimmerman pursued Martin but lost him in the apartment complex. Martin confronted Zimmerman for pursuing him. The confrontation resulted in a fatal wound to the chest. Zimmerman chased after Martin. This is fact yet you continue to deny it.

Which is why you refuse to admit to yourself that Zimmerman chased after Martin. Martin himself was entitled to defend himself. I agree that Martin could have resolved this in a more civilized manner. I give the kid some slack because he did nothing wrong except to be noticed by someone who would eventually shoot him. Zimmerman initiated a pursuit of a young black male in "his" neighborhood. Martin died as a result of that pursuit. Period, mother @#$%er.

 

You have ZERO proof - and cannot find anything to the contrary.

But the subject was Hillary's email. It has nothing to do with " disregarded every accusation she has ever been subjected to". Apparently you have nothing to contradict that she had classified email and thus broke the law.

Subject was Benghazi. Obviously you have nothing to contradict her email and thus proof she lied.

Chased him down implies caught him. That qujote was from http://viewfromll2.com/2013/07/05/t...scenarios-of-the-prosecution-and-the-defense/. Again, I cite documented facts while you have a prejudiced opinion.

Again, facts say Zimmerman did not catch Martin. Aside from the FACT that a jury of his peer acquitted Zimmerman, all you can produce is your prejudice opinion.

He was acquitted. End of your opinions as related to reality.

 

How did this thread turn into a discussion involving the violent Trayvon Martin and the not-guilty George Zimmerman? That's the last I'll say on the matter in this thread.

 

It is the last I am say also until he can produce facts to contradict my statements. i.e. the last I say.

 

moron joe can believe Hildebeest is honest, authentic, warm, funny, qualified or whatever else her campaign claims she is....he can even cut & paste blogs to try to convince us. The problem is that no one believes it. Voters across the country know exactly what Hillary is. The fact that dims are supporting an idiot like Sanders or recruiting a fool like Biden is the only proof needed.

 

Aren't you the same idiot that also bloviated that the Obama Administration was the most corrupt in political history? By what standard? Convictions? Indictments? Charges? Oh wait...

 

Incorrect.

Mumbling.

I will make this short. You are a liar.

Good day.