Is Trump Unstoppable?

WOW! You interpret me telling you to fuck yourselves as being frustrated? OK. I'm really just being dismissive to fools too stupid to bother with. You lost the argument when you refused to answer and you really lost when your pet tool jumped to your aid. Again, you're both too stupid to know that you've been beaten to a pulp. That makes me smile, not frustrated. Bless my heart.

 

This is funny because your party is batshit crazy.


Senator on GOP backing Trump: 'Party has gone bats*** crazy'

Associated Press
By DONNA CASSATA, Associated Press



"Lindsey Graham: GOP is "bats**t crazy"" will play after this ad - 00:08

WASHINGTON — Sen. Lindsey Graham is disgusted with the GOP's embrace of Donald Trump: "My party has gone bats*** crazy."

In no-holds-barred remarks at a celebratory dinner Thursday night, the South Carolina senator and unsuccessful presidential candidate said the GOP has lost all semblance of sanity and predicted the party will suffer irrevocable losses in November if it backs Trump.

Graham said the GOP has its best chance in years to win as Democrats are likely to nominate Hillary Clinton, who has been damaged by questions about her trustworthiness. But his party is about to blow it, he said.

"The most dishonest person in America is a woman, who's about to become president. How could that be? My party has gone bats*** crazy," Graham said.

The plain-spoken Graham has repeatedly engaged in name-calling with Trump. Earlier Thursday, Graham called the GOP front-runner a "nut job" and insisted his party would go down like the Titanic if it backed the billionaire businessman.

© AP Photo/Susan Walsh, File FILE - In this Jan. 21, 2016 file photo, Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C. speaks during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington. In no-holds-barred remarks Thursday, Feb. 25, 2016, the South Carolina senator…Hours later, at the Washington Press Club Foundation's annual congressional dinner, attended by more than 750 lawmakers, journalists and congressional aides, Graham made a scathing attack on the GOP and several of his former presidential rivals. The dinner traditionally is a joke-filled affair with lawmakers poking fun at each other.

Of Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, who has alienated Republicans and Democrats alike, Graham said, "A good Republican would defend Ted Cruz after tonight. That ain't happening. If you killed Ted Cruz on the floor of the Senate and the trial was in the Senate, nobody could convict you."

Reading from notes, Graham said, "I was asked the hardest question of my political life. Do you agree with Donald Trump that Ted Cruz is the biggest liar in politics? Too close to call."

"I know exactly when Ted's going to drop out of the race. March 12th. That's Canadian week at Myrtle Beach, when all of our Canadian friends get 10 percent off," he said.

Graham called 44-year-old Florida Sen. Marco Rubio "boy wonder" and suggested he was politically malleable.

"I'm not saying he would change his positions, but he would change his positions," said Graham, who worked with Rubio on a sweeping immigration bill on which the presidential candidate has backtracked.

In closing, Graham declared himself the Dr. Jack Kevorkian of the GOP presidential campaign, referring to the euthanasia activist who died in 2011. Graham's own presidential bid faltered, and he had to drop out. He endorsed Jeb Bush, who subsequently quit.

Graham then pulled out a white baseball cap emblazoned with Trump's "Make America Great Again" slogan and endorsed the New Yorker.

"I endorse Donald Trump and hope the Graham magic still exists," he said.

 

Useful idiot! Stooge! Dupe! Moron! Lindsay Graham? You can have her!

 

Let's see. I answered in post #2, clembo in post #3, coin in post #4, and then you insults and lies started in post #5. Somehow you think that has beaten us to a pulp?

 

King Moron, the pic you posted says "Trump supporters". Obviously, from your denial that they're Trump supporters, you don't believe they are. Thanks for clearing that up.

 

The most accurate way to explain why JokeNation posts these false hoods is simply because he is a brain washed commie robot. Delusional people are technically not liars.

 

Well it seems you can't really respond now can you Daniel Jones.

Yes, I do feel that Ted Cruz is delusional. Too delusional as I said in my original post.
I also feel that Marco Rubio is the only one that now stands a chance against Trump in the GOP and I highly doubt he will succeed.
That is my opinion and, last I checked, I'm still entitled to it.

You are entitled to yours as well.


In the long run what I feel doesn't mean squat in the GOP primaries because I won't vote for any of them.
YOU'RE vote might matter when it comes down to brass tacks but not mine.


That aside can you please explain (or at least make a feeble attempt) at this response. Three key words (and small ones at that) that really make any sense in a world of supposed adults?

You're working on accuse because I feel Ted Cruz is delusional.
Does that, somehow in your mind, make me a COMMIE HACK?

Seems kind of delusional to me.


If that's the case welcome another possibly.

Could CoinOKC be a COMMIE HACK?

I highly doubt it. Just seems we somewhat share the same opinion of Ted Cruz's chances in this scenario albeit not necessarily for the same reasons.



Could CoinOKC be a COMMIE HACK? No more than I am and no less if you get down to it.

 

Trump IS unstoppable. Certainly not by Rubio. Maybe Mitt Romney! Not!

 

The Right has run 2 billionaires in the last two elections. They claim that they are tired of bought and paid for politicians. So naturally they get behind the people that bought and paid for those politicians. You kind of get the feeling that nobody is driving that crazy bus. These are the kind if people that show their outrage over losing their jobs by buying stock in their former employers business with their unemployment checks.

 

Random Observations on Last Night's GOP Fisting Fest

At last night's Republican debate/hate-fisting fest, you could say, if you were so inclined, that Sen. Marco Rubio "won," if by "won," you mean, "Still had his pants on and his ass was relatively unspanked." Sure, why not? You could talk about the good jabs he got in on sentient stainless steel dildo Donald Trump, especially the upcoming civil case about "Trump University," the farcical con job perpetrated by Trump on his most desperate fans. You could nod in agreement when Rubio challenged Trump to explain a health care plan alternative to the Affordable Care Act. You could laugh along as Rubio accused Trump of his own mortal sin: repetition without awareness.

You could have a jolly time pretending that any of it mattered in the least. Because, see, in the world we are damned to exist in now, Rubio didn't lay a glove on Trump. Putting aside that it's truly hilarious that any Republican would criticize any other Republican for not having a credible health coverage proposal, and putting aside that Rubio gave a smug, dickish self-satisfied smile whenever he thought he got in a good line, like a home-schooled spelling bee champ who got the word right, Rubio accomplished virtually nothing beyond avoiding another week of headlines about how much Marco Rubio sucks at debating.

The content of the debate is meaningless since none of the candidates said anything that approached a workable, genuine "plan" on anything. Trump went on about his imaginary wall and immigrants, Ted Cruz batted at the phantoms of liberal hottentots storming the gates of his nice country, Rubio did his usual best to sound vaguely rational while talking about completely bugnuts shit, John Kasich responded to everything like he just got out of electroshock therapy (and had the haircut to prove it), and there is a rumor that Ben Carson was there. Let's not waste any time talking about how full of shit they all were other than to say, "Yeah, they were all full of shit."

Instead, look at this exchange:
"Trump: If people -- my plan is very simple. I will not -- we're going to have private -- we are going to have health care, but I will not allow people to die on the sidewalks and the streets of our country if I'm president. You may let it and you may be fine with it...

"Cruz: So does the government pay for everyone's health care?

"Trump: ... I'm not fine with it. We are going to take those people...

"Cruz: Yes or no. Just answer the question.

"Trump: Excuse me. We are going to take those people and those people are going to be serviced by doctors and hospitals. We're going to make great deals on it, but we're not going to let them die in the streets.

"Cruz: Who pays for it?"

It's not a stretch to say that Cruz is implying that he's fine with people dying "on the sidewalks and streets" as long as the nation doesn't have to pay for their health care. What passed for compassion at the Republican debate was stating that Americans should be able to stay alive. Greatest country in the history forever. That's the level of unrepentant fuckery at which we're playing here.

Trump really won because none of the candidates have even the slightest understanding about where Trump's support comes from. Rubio thought he could undermine Trump by showing how the supposed mogul's business dealings are shady at best and illegal at worst. Cruz tried to paint Trump as a Democrat in elephant drag, a fake conservative who would destroy conservative principles (which, apparently, involve immediately deporting children and letting poor people die while bombing other nations).

Both of their campaigns have fundamentally failed to grasp that Trump is in the lead simply because he's Trump. That's got little to do with Trump's experience or his politics beyond "He hates who I hate." It's just fuckin' cult of personality. People want to be with the dude who thinks he's a winner no matter how much of a loser he might be. You know how in high school there was a loudmouth dickhead football player who was verbally abusive and a buffoon but somehow had tons of friends and got all the tail? Yeah, that guy. That's Trump. Meanwhile, Rubio acts like an altar boy who's upset that he's the only one not molested by the priest. Cruz is the prick who wanted so badly to be the class clown but is just a cruel prankster whose asshole dad thinks he's funny.

So let's stop with the pretense that last night's debate did a goddamn thing. Republicans better accept their Trumpish overlord or get the fuck out.

The real story from last night is how fucking worthless Wolf Blitzer was as a moderator. He got steamrolled time and again, had no control over the candidates, pathetically attempted to keep things on track, barely asked follow-ups, and was a quivering, useless lump of flesh with white stubble by the end. On top of that, frightening Hugh Hewitt, who looks like a poorly-healed burn victim, attempted to get the candidates to agree to a "litmus test" of Supreme Court candidates on "religious liberty," which means something like "Don't make Christians follow the Constitution." How is that even a question at a supposedly "mainstream" debate?

Another disgraceful evening in the Republican primary season is over. Let's all have fruit salad and hang out with Polish workers and try to forget that the future of the nation might end up in the slime-encrusted hands of one of these ethical lepers.
- See more at: http://rudepundit.blogspot.com/#sthash.TaSO5jKp.dpuf

 

Yes, you and I are entitled to our opinions, which is all that you have in your assertion that Ted Cruz is delusional, not fact, and not even an intelligent thing to say, especially for one who prides himself on "intelligence". Now, despite your denial of being a commie hack, just look at the ideology of those who you support and compare that to known communists. This is more fact than opinion, son.

 

So what is their"ideology"? Have you looked at Cruz's ideology? You labeled Clembo a commie hack based on some preconception you've never articulated, nor do I believe that you even could articulate it if you tried. So please, climb down off of your high-horse or more accurately out of it's ass. You certainly don't speak from a position of wisdom. You idiots buy into the Communist/Socialist rhetoric so easily but none one of you can actually articulate exactly what that means. Hell, you don't even know the difference between Communism and Socialism.

You suffer from confirmation bias. Confirmation bias is a tendency to search for or interpret information in a way that confirms one's preconceptions, leading to statistical errors or in your case, asinine assumptions.

 

Yes, I know Ted Cruz is your hero, now I know why.... Perkins endorsed Cruz.

FRC President Tony Perkins Supported Former KKK Leader David Duke And Louisiana's White Supremacists



I've mentioned this many times before, but it's certainly worth mentioning again this week. From an SPLC article I've excerpted here before:In 1996, while managing the U.S. Senate campaign of Woody Jenkins against Mary Landrieu,

Perkins paid $82,500 to use the mailing list of former Klan chieftain David Duke. The campaign was fined $3,000 (reduced from $82,500) after Perkins and Jenkins filed false disclosure forms in a bid to hide their link to Duke. Five years later, on May 17, 2001, Perkins gave a speech to the Louisiana chapter of the Council of Conservative Citizens (CCC), a white supremacist group that has described black people as a “retrograde species of humanity.” Perkins claimed not to know the group’s ideology at the time, but it had been widely publicized in Louisiana and the nation, because in 1999 — two years before Perkins’ speech to the CCC — Republican House Speaker Trent Lott had been embroiled in a national scandal over his ties to the group. GOP chairman Jim Nicholson then urged Republicans to avoid the CCC because of its “racist views.” The Duke incident surfaced again in local press in 2002, when Perkins ran for the Republican nomination for the Senate, dooming his campaign to a fourth-place finish in the primaries.

From the Council Of Conservative Citizen's statement of principles:

We believe in the traditional family as the basic unit of human society and morality, and we oppose all efforts by the state and other powers to weaken the structure of the American family through toleration of sexual licentiousness, homosexuality and other perversions, mixture of the races, pornography in all forms, and subversion of the authority of parents.​

Not one cable news network or mainstream newspaper has mentioned Perkins' racist past since the FRC shooting.

UPDATE: Here is a PDF of the Federal Election Commission ruling that FRC president Tony Perkins violated campaign expenditure disclosure law when he tried to hide his payment to KKK Grand Wizard David Duke.

 

This is all news to me, but now that you brought it up, all I can really say about it is there are bad apples in every cart. Just look at all those spoild rotten apples in that Hillary cart! Ha, ha, ha!!!

 

Admittedly, both me and Clembo were being a little contumelious in our posts. Regardless, the difference between communist and socialist is a matter of degree, in that, communists will lock up, torture, and/or kill their opponents while socialists merely try intimidating them with demagoguery, lies, and phony compassion.

 

And your confirmation bias kicks in..... Ha ha ha ha....

 

Byrd? Fulbright?

 

DOJ Exonerates Clinton's Handling Of Email But Few Report It
By Karoli Kuns

It's a disgrace that the only "major" media outlet to report this was the right-wing Washington Times. After months of having Hillary Clinton's email non-scandal gracing every major media outlet in the country, not one single Beltway reporter caught this one until the Washington Times did. And even after they did, no one reported it until late Friday, when Buzzfeed and Chris Hayes managed to scrounge a report about it.

That's a disgrace.

In a little noticed brief, filed on Wednesday to a federal court, Department of Justice lawyers outlined a comprehensive defense of the contentious decision by Hillary Clinton to wipe the private email server she used as secretary of state: The attorneys assert that, regardless of whether she used a personal or government account, Clinton was within her legal right to handpick the emails that qualified as federal records — and to delete the ones she deemed personal.

“There is no question that former Secretary Clinton had authority to delete personal emails without agency supervision — she appropriately could have done so even if she were working on a government server,” write the Justice Department attorneys, representing the State Department in the brief.

The lawyers add that under policies issued by the State Department and by NARA, the National Archives and Records Administration, government employees “are permitted and expected to exercise judgment to determine what constitutes a federal record.”

Can someone please tell me why there's always extra air time for the likes of Donald Trump and Ted Cruz and breathless reports about why Hillary might go to jail, but when the official legal opinion of the United States Department of Justice comes out, there's radio silence?

(It's rhetorical. We all know the answer.)

This coverage has been an utter disgrace right from the beginning, and it's not just doing harm to her candidacy. It's doing harm to our democracy. Imagine what they'll do to Bernie Sanders or any other candidate they view as a serious threat to a Republican presidency.

http://crooksandliars.com/2015/09/doj-exonerates-clintons-handling-email-few