Yet Another Trump Administration Scandal...SESSIONS!

What's it been like a month? The sleaziest administration in history is on a break-neck pace to become the all time champions of scandal and corruption. Session should resign and go to jail over lying to congress. He is only the first of many that should and will suffer this fate. I told you this was going to be fun.

 

As you keep posting, just how many have been convicted?

 

Hahaha... no scandal. This is just more lies being concocted by the powerless, desperate Dems. Crap like this is expected from the liberals who have nothing else to offer.

 

Lol

 

Sessions isn't denying that he met with Russian a Envoy. He just lied to congress about meeting with a Russian Envoy. THAT IS a crime. The Justice Department just confirmed the meetings.

 

So instead of just posting poop pics, now you Photoshop poop pics? Sniveling Joe, you have really taken this election hard, haven't you.

 

We managed to live through Holder and Lynch, i am sure you will manage to survive Sessions in spite of yourself.

 

All you merit anymore....

 

Who do you think you're kidding?
That's actually a photo of all members of the DNC with an allegiance to the US of A.
​

.

 

There's nothing to this one, folks. It's very, very routine. This is just one more example of liberals trying to make something out of nothing.

...
(Sessions) defenders say (meetings with Russian ambassadors) between senators and diplomats were routine. And Sessions even got an inadvertent boost from Democratic Missouri Sen. Claire McCaskill, who in demanding the AG's resignation initially claimed she never called or met with Russia's ambassador -- only for tweets to surface indicating she had, at least twice.

Other former colleagues intentionally came to Sessions' defense, backing the former Alabama senator's claim he only met with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak in his official capacity as a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee.

“I’ve met with the Russian ambassador with a group, in my capacity, with a group of other senators,” Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., told CNN. “That’s in my official capacity. That’s nothing. That’s my job.”

Sen. Roy Blunt, R-Mo., said in a statement that he’d talked to “at least twenty ambassadors in the last six weeks.”

“It would have been very normal for Sessions, as a senator, to have talked to the Russian ambassador without discussing the election,” Blunt said.

Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, said on MSNBC that he’d met with “six ambassadors in the last five months.” Though he hadn’t met with Kislyak, Cruz said he would do so without reservations.
...

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...rom-senate-allies-and-dem-s-twitter-flub.html

 

No it is not. That would be completely devoid of color - lights out and sound proof.

 

Except that Sessions lied to congress which IS a felony.

 

You mean Sessions is a felony even though it was unintentional, but Holder's lies (intentional to hide Fast and Furious +) were not felonies? I will bet you have major problems explaining that.

Oh, BTW, perjury requires intent.

 

LOL!

 

DAMN RIGHT!!!!!!

That opens the door for a special prosecutor.

 

I hate to tell you this, but you're grabbing at imaginary straws. Yes, Sessions has recused himself (which he should do) in order to alleviate any perception of impropriety in the face of these ridiculous accusations by the Left. Now, please tell me when/where he met with any Russian ambassador to discuss the presidential campaign. I'll be waiting...

...
The attorney general held a press conference as he sought to calm the political firestorm over revelations he spoke twice with Russia’s ambassador last year despite telling senators during his confirmation hearing he had no “communications” with Moscow.

Sessions defended his answer as “honest and correct,” suggesting he was referring only to discussions about the campaign.

“I never had meetings with Russian operatives or Russian intermediaries about the Trump campaign,” he said.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...elated-probes-denies-misleading-congress.html

 

Sorry But Jeff Sessions Absolutely Did NOT Perjure Himself Under Oath When Asked About Russia

March 2, 2017

Some of the same liberal law professors and journalists who thought Hillary should be President after lying to Congress about hiding emails and who also praised Clapper’s “independence” after he repeatedly lied to Congress about NSA spying, now attack Attorney General Sessions under a bogus claim of “lying” to Congress. There is no basis to suggest Sessions committed any crime at all for doing his job as a Senator on the Armed Services Committee.

Sessions, as a Senator on the Armed Services Committee, met with over 20 ambassadors in 2016. One of them was the Russian ambassador. There is no evidence, at all, Sessions met with the ambassador to review Trump campaign strategy, or anything of the sort. The suggestion that our Senators should not be meeting with representatives of foreign governments is ludicrous, especially coming from people who championed the Clinton Foundation meeting with foreign governments frequently to fund their Clinton Foundation and personal enrichment.

The criminal law only prohibits lying to Congress under two statutes — 18 USC 1621 ands 18 USC 1001. Section 1621 requires a person “willfully and contrary” to a sworn oath “subscribe a material matter” which is both false and the person knows to be false. Section 1001 is basically the same, without certain tribunal prerequisites: it also requires the government prove a person willfully made a materially false statement. This requires three elements: first, a false statement; second, the false statement be “material”; and third, the false statement be made “knowingly” and “willfully.” A statement is not false if it can be interpreted in an innocent manner. A statement is not material if it is not particularly relevant to the subject of the inquiry. Willfully is a very high standard of proof: it requires the person know they are committing the crime, and do so anyway. None of the three exist as to Sessions.

There was strong evidence Hillary Clinton made false statements to Congress about a range of subjects concerning the emails, and evidence she knew they were false. She still was not prosecuted, and Professors like Laurence Tribe recommended her for the Presidency. There was strong evidence James Clapper lied to Congress about the NSA spying on Americans, and he was not prosecuted, but promoted by President Obama, without complaint from many of these same liberal lawyers, professors and journalists. Yet, these same “lawyers” and “journalists” now attack Sessions for what is manifestly not a criminal act, and for which they never demanded any inquiry of either Clinton or Clapper.

Their only claim against Sessions is that Sessions, while Senator, talked to the Russian ambassador a whopping 2 times in 2016. That’s called doing his job. Senator Franken, during the Attorney General confirmation proceedings, talked about “ties to Russia” and asked if Senator Session had discussed the Trump campaign “with Russian government officials.” Sessions answered he had not. Sessions has no “ties with Russia” and there is no evidence he discussed the Trump campaign with any Russian official. The attempt to conflate Sessions doing his job as a Senator — meeting with ambassadors — as meaning he must have talked about campaign tactics or the campaign at all is patently ludicrous.

Read more: http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/sor...e-himself-under-oath-when-asked-about-russia/