I find it remarkable that there's rarely actual defending of Trump here. Just a lot of "whatabout whatabout whatabout" Makes me think you all know deep down what he is, even if you can't admit it.
How many times have you seen me write that he was far from my favorite candidate, yet I still felt he dwarfed the running democrats in terms of qualifications for the job? The skull is meant to prevent damage to the brain . . . Not to prevent entry of new information.
That doesn't matter anymore. He won. Keep him in check, it's your responsibility too. I think you'll find I've gone off on Obama, Biden, et al. too. It no longer matters whether or not he would be better than others hypothetically
I wouldn’t defend George Patton either. He was not a good man. But he was sure as heck the right man for the job at hand….. And on the subject of national security, I am bringing up a boy that is coming of age. It sure is comforting to know he is coming of age in a world with far less military conflicts than there were a very short time ago.
I gotcha. And fact is, I would too. But his mouth and temper kept him in hot water back in his day and that was rather the parallel I was drawing.
I think it’s hilarious how Joe Briben and his worthless Sec of State Blinken are trying to take credit for the Mideast Peace deal. Hell, it was those two who got us in the mess to begin with! They won’t even give credit where credit is due! I WOULD say, “Look at the balls on those two”, but I don’t think there’s a pair between them.
Of course it matters. Why, you might ask? Because the basis for your preferences has been disclosed. Because your superficial evaluation of his qualifications, based on what he says and not on what he does has proven itself to be erroneous. Results take a back seat to your prejudices . . . You are shallow, and incapable of being truly objective.
Oh no, what he does is plenty chaotic and bad too. Inflation getting worse, foreign relations at all time lows, extrajuducial murder of Venezuelans, rollback of lgbt rights, complete assault on science, masked and armed men patrolling cities abducting people, just to name a few.
Do you ever find it difficult to claim you're on the high ground whilst burying your head so far in the sand?
It isn’t moral high ground. It is what is right as defined by natural law for eons. Neither Google or 21st century education changes that.
Whilst..... Ah, one of the King's Church Of England Minions deems the opinion of a Citizen of the Federal Republic of the United States of America as equal to an Ostrich. The head in sand quip is the product of Myth and skewered translation of the Book Of Proverbs. Every member of the British Domesticated Ostrich Association knows this. They should. The Association members raise Ostriches to eat them. (yes, that is a real organization-I know weird stuff). Summary: A fellow employs the King's English to belittle the position of a U..S. Citizen that prefers the governance of a Federal Republic by a duly elected PRESIDENT (as opposed to a privileged heredity based do-nothing KING), and the fellow utters this opinion as a supposed U.S. Citizen that is supposedly living in south Korea and supposedly is involved in the inner actions of the cranial area and obviously hates Ostriches. I remind my fellow Board members that King Arthur is a myth, and Ostriches burying their head in the sand is a myth, and Monarchs in England can't govern the Palace Cat Community, let alone a Federal Republic, and that fellows that use word whilst as a method to convey superiority of fact, is....not the person being presented as a genuine article, is suspect as a fabrication of the Church Of England ideology Of Division and is probably an active uniformed member of the PLA or the Spetsnaz Disinformation Dissemination Bureau... or MI6 (who are still mad as hell about 1776). This has been another Charley Talk. YW.
Morphing the English language, as has been the art of liberals, it's my turn . . . Those are Emotives . . . every last one of them.
Open with the camera app on your phone and scan the QR code below. @GeneWright, you're in for a treat!
You're gonna have to describe it to me. Bluesky has a super strict block implemented, so I couldn't even see who posted what you linked if I wanted to.
