Good-bye and Good Riddens

Which one of mine?

 

Im not mistaken at all In 1977 i was living in Scotland , i was there , were you ?

Ill get you a link to debunk that pic , one less monster for you to worry about.

 

one fake photo does NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT disprove the existence of the creature.

 

Wait a minute..are you conceding its fake already ? But... but.. but.. you said it was the real one.
Heres the link anyway

http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/Hoaxipedia/Loch_Ness_Monster_Hoaxes/#The_Loch_Ness_Muppet

 

"One of the clearest photos of the Loch Ness monster was taken by Anthony 'Doc' Shiels in May of 1977. The picture is so clear, however, it immediately makes experts skeptical and has been referred to in some circles as "the Loch Ness Muppet." Shiels himself, a self-styled physic, has said that while he definitely takes photos of lake monsters, he doesn't believe in them." (public domain) see, you are wrong. It's a PROBABLE fake, but not definite.

 

That idiotic site, it's run by a cynic. Shiels signed an affidavit attesting to the authenticity of the creature.

 

Why did you edit the copy/paste ? Let me put it up in full for you.

The Loch Ness Muppet

May 21, 1977: Anthony ‘Doc’ Shiels claimed that he took this picture while camping beside Urquhart Castle. Its startling clarity (it’s probably the clearest picture of Nessie ever taken) has made it popular with the public. But it’s hard to find any expert willing to take it seriously, simply because the creature depicted in it looks so obviously fake. (And it’s odd that there are no ripples in the water around the neck.) Skeptics refer to Shiels’s monster as “The Loch Ness Muppet.“ The fact that Shiels was a showman, “wizard,“ and psychic entertainer who was developing a side business as a professional monster hunter didn’t help his credibility. Shiels himself commented that while he definitely took photos of lake monsters, he didn’t believe in them.

 

That just shows his mental issues.

 

Showing whos issues ?

Now then , you say this fellow signed an official document confirming the pic is genuine.You'll no doubt have a link to that document?

 

I read it in a book.

 

I see ...in a book , one of those books with big glossy pictures of genuine monsters.
If you want the real deal go to the source , Scotland my lad , lets see what the Scots are saying about Nessie

http://www.weird-websites.com/weird_news/Loch-Ness-Monster-nessie-scotland-pictures-photos.htm

 

and this is Bigfoot:

 

Ahh yes i can see the likeness , now what about Santas elves , why dont they exist?

 

that photograph is from a reputable source.

 

Im sure it is , i wonder why then if one could get as close to bigfoot ..why not fill him full of lead and claim a huge bounty from the media , a photo is only ever going to be scoffed at.

Did you know the Loch Ness Monster is responsible for starting most of todays conflicts ? Dont believe me ? I have photos from a reputable source which i wont name..obviously

 

Well since your so eager for a source I just noticed this photo when looking through old issues of The National Enquirer.

~Isaiah

 

Since when was the National Enquirer a reputable source ?

 

since the first issue.

 

Here's yet another credible photo of the loch ness monster circa 1994

 

The first issues were mainly concerned with ufos,bigfoot,double decker buses on the moon , Queen of Englands an alien type of journalism were they not?

Lately i see they have a few lawsuits on claims of Mrs McCain having an affair , Mrs Palin having an affair , so its no surprise they uncovered Edwards , they accused everybody of the same thing.
Shake the tree enough somethings going to fall.