Howdy Doody~A Communist puppet?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by clembo, Mar 1, 2009.

  1. clembo

    clembo Well-Known Member

    Think about it folks.

    HOWDY DOODY.

    Most definitely a puppet.
    Red hair and freckles.
    Red kerchief around his pinko little communist worshipping whip of a wooden neck.

    Everything about this abomination was COMMUNIST!

    [​IMG]

    While parents were oblivious to the fact this little scumbag slipped right under the McCarthy radar. Kids are smart and if drilled at an early enough age with subliminal propoganda they come to see the ways of a lousy pinko like HOWDY DOODY.

    Think this a joke? Here's a rare shot of "HOWDY" at a Russian military parade.

    [​IMG]

    With these obviously true statements it is the DUTY (as opposed to DOODY) of every red blooded American to remove ANY references of HOWDY DOODY from any form of anything that may be considered free speech. By surpressing free speech we can save this nation and ultimately the world!
     
  2. craig a

    craig a New Member

    HMMmmm.
     
  3. vess1

    vess1 "Birds of a feather...."

    At one time the American people despised communism and everything was a plot and everybody was a spy.
    In fact, I just read that when the Franklin half dollar came out in 1948, people got suspicious because of the designers initials on Franklin's shoulder. Although this was common practice on coins in the past, the initials were 'JRS' for John R. Sinnock.

    People thought it was a conspiracy and that the initials stood for Joseph Stalin!

    The news caused such an uproar that the mint had to come out with a press release, revealing the name of their designer in order to calm people's fears!

    My how far we are from those days. Now people are so ignorant they could come out with a Franklin half dollar now and a large portion of the public wouldn't even know who it was. Let alone be looking for subliminal messages.

    Now they beg for communism as a solution to their problems despite it's proven failures in the past. Funny what the people support now and how things are turning out.


    "It is enough that the people know there was an election. The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything."


    "When we hang the capitalists they will sell us the rope we use."

    "If the opposition disarms, well and good. If it refuses to disarm, we shall disarm it ourselves."

    "America is like a healthy body and its resistance is threefold: its patriotism, its morality, and its spiritual life. If we can undermine these three areas, America will collapse from within."

    " If ever the U.S. government begins gradual investment in private enterprise, the citizens will accept communism without even knowing it."

    - Josef Stalin


     
  4. craig a

    craig a New Member

    Who is begging for cummunism? And Stalin was a Marxist not a Communist
     
  5. scottishmoney

    scottishmoney ¿Quien sabes?

    Actually what really happened was that it was the Roosevelt dime, that was released in 1946, look at the bottom of FDR's bust, and you will notice the JS for Joseph Sinnock. This pre-dated the Franklin half by a couple of years.

    Similarly the commie scare people were all up in arms in 1964 when the Kennedy half rolled out, they thought that Gilroy Roberts initials were a small hammer and sickle device on the coin.
     
  6. De Orc

    De Orc Well-Known Member

    Lets see he started out with the Bolshevik working against the Mensheviks :D
    Now the Bolshevik were a faction of the Marxist Russian Social Democratic Labour Party who split fron the aforementioned Mensheviks and by 1917 had transmogrified into Communist Party of the Soviet Union of which Joe Stalin was a leading member
    Joe was general secretary of the Communist Party by 1922, Chairman of the Council of People's Commissars of the USSR by 1941, Chairman of the Council of Ministers of the USSR from 1946 till his death and he wasnt a commie LOL
     
  7. scottishmoney

    scottishmoney ¿Quien sabes?

    Josef Dzhugashvili was not a commie huh? I am sure he is spitting in hell at the thought of that statement.
     
  8. craig a

    craig a New Member

    No he was a marxist. A marxist-leninist to be more exact. A train of thought that wasnt really communist. Communism at its purest is like nirvana. But it will never work here anyway, so dont worry. Americans are too greedy
     
  9. scottishmoney

    scottishmoney ¿Quien sabes?

    You blokes can label Stalin to whatever "ist" or "ism" you want. Nothing can take away from the fact that he was a murderous tyrant that murdered more of his countrymen than Hitler did. The only tyrant with a worse record of murderous rampage may have been Mao, but he succeeded in erasing a lot of that from history.
     
  10. De Orc

    De Orc Well-Known Member

    Quite agree with your verdict there SM, I might be inclined to add Pol Pot to the list as a possible contender as well.
    So Stalin was a Marxist Leninist and not a Commie :eek:, specialy as he was head of the Communist Party in Russia? Makes one wonder how a Non Communist got to that position dont it?
    But Perhaps Craig is unaware that Marxism-Leninism is a communist ideological stream that emerged as the mainstream tendency among the Communist parties in the 1920s as it was adopted as the ideological foundation of the Communist International during Stalin's era and was declared the official doctrine of the state by the Communist Party Ie it was Communism
    Most Communist States followed or stated they followed a form of Marxist Leninist idiology at one time or another. A lot of people who use the term are in all honesty not that familiar with communist ideology, same goes for the term Stalinism, Moaism, Trotskyism, Jucheism etc Yet they all stem from the same basic ideas those of Marx and Engles who by the way co authored the Communist Manifesto in 1848
     
  11. craig a

    craig a New Member

    Yea, I'm aware. But that only makes Stalin something other than a true communist. Just like alot of Republicans down south belong to the John Birch society. And are influenced by that idea. Or a democrat with socialist leanings. and what about past American Presidents who allowed the slaughter of so many American Indians? How come you didnt include them. A murderous tyrant does not a commie make.
     
  12. De Orc

    De Orc Well-Known Member

    Craig perhaps you would care to enlighten me as to the difference? Now as for former American Presidents which one authorised the slaughter of Millions of American Indians?
    Stalin Orderd the deaths of millions of Russians
    Moa Orderd the deaths of Millions of Chinese
    Pot Orderd the deaths of millions of Cambodians
     
  13. scottishmoney

    scottishmoney ¿Quien sabes?

    Not one American president ever authorised the slaughter of American Indians, well unless you include Lincoln's little debacle where he authorised the execution of 39 Sioux after the 1862 uprising. He could have had all 303 killed on December 26th 1862, but he was a bit more discretionary that day apparently.

    OTOH, Andrew Jackson authorised the ethnic cleansing of the American southeast, Georgia, Alabama, North and South Carolina back in the 1830's and then wantonly ignored a Supreme Court opinion under John Marshall that it was unconstitutional. The resultant action was the Trail of Tears.
     
  14. scottishmoney

    scottishmoney ¿Quien sabes?

    I will agree with you on the addition of Pol Pot, but whilst he killed a significant majority of the population, the overall numbers were still less than the 40-60 Million that Stalin and Mao both aspired to having sent to the netherworlds.
     
  15. David

    David Proud Enemy of Hillary

    Stalinism...Marxism...Maoism all have the same genesis. They were all devious schemes designed to gain power & control. These sinister leaders just wanted to come up with an idealogy that the people would fall for. Gee, sound familiar?
     
  16. craig a

    craig a New Member

    I never wrote authorized. I wrote allowed. But I think TR might have admitted that it was US policy. But I wrote slaughter, and you wrote ethnic cleansing. Quite different, I guess.
     
  17. scottishmoney

    scottishmoney ¿Quien sabes?

    Slaughter, ethnic cleansing - they all accomplish the same task, different terms, same result - death for a group of powerless individuals. You can term it however you or I want, it all is the same thing in the finality.
     
  18. craig a

    craig a New Member

    I wasnt arguing with you. I thought you were the one who wrote that Jackson ordered the ethnic cleasning of indians. I wrote slaughter and then you wrote no President ever ordered the slaughter of, and then you wrote except Andrew....remember? I wrote 'quite different, I guess' in a more sarcastic way, which wasnt meant to offend. My mistake.
     

Share This Page