So says the EU President: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,510445,00.html http://edition.cnn.com/2009/BUSINESS/03/25/EU.topolanek.us.economy/
Yeah, and the Presidency of the EU is the most unpopular they have had in years. This turkey has made lots of enemies in Europe.
On second thought maybe that buttwipe would like to try out a little Czechoslovak style communism again.
Interesting read, especially this part. "A day after his government collapsed because of a parliamentary vote of no-confidence, Topolanek took the EU presidency on a collision course with Washington over how to deal with the global economic recession. Most European leaders favor tighter financial regulation, while the U.S. has been pushing for larger economic stimulus plans." Sounds like a good guy to take advice from doesn't he. Tighter financial regulation? Too Socialist of course in a free market society filled with thieves. Obama's damned if he do and damned if he don't. Worldwide it seems.
Instead of trying to find someone to blame, I wish more people would take responsibility and would try to do what they can to fix things.
They seem to get it, don't they? Perhaps they have learned their lesson pursuing the socialist/communist/Marxist ways??
They have the benefit of being objective, I suppose. Too many here are blinded by the prospects of Obama's freebies.
Well, Since you blew right over this one David hows about I bring it up again. Tighter financial regulation being espoused from the people that "have the benefit of being objective". Does that objectivity fit into our "free market" or does it border on socialism, marxism, facism? Sounds like more government regulation to me.
The "objectivity" claim was in reference to the earlier comment about European leaders preferring Bush over Obama. Do try to keep up.
Yer so smart David! Can you give me a list of those European leaders that have stated they preferred Bush over Obama? You can even use his whipping boy Tony Blair. Oh and BTW back to the ORIGINAL question. More regulation on financial institutions is the answer? Do try to answer or evade the queston again.
I'll try to go slow so that you can understand...I never said European leaders preferred Bush over Obama. I merely commented on the statement that was made by another poster. Get it now? So you'll quit having a hissy, more regulation? No. Continue throwing more money at financial institutions hoping the problems will go away? No. Government taking over every aspect of out lives? No. A false prophet leading our country straight to hell? No. What else? No lobbyists in the White House? Right. Pillars of the community in his cabinet? Can say "tax dodgers"?Transparency in government? When? Eliminate pork? Uh-huh. Can you explain "The Obama Plan" to me?
