Do you believe in the moon landing?

I believe there was a British guy who once said, "They need only to keep the small secrets a secret. The big ones are kept by the publics own incredulity (disbelief)."

 

Mass Murderers, actually.

But the reason I stated that is because I asked myself the questions.

Would I be a party to faking a moon landing. I would have to say that yes, I probably would be ok with that.

But, for the 911 question...no way in hell would I be a party. I think it would take a certain person to be able to do that...and I think that person would have to qualify as a mass murderer.

 

Take an hour and read the article, it is an interesting read and is well written. Once you read it you will probably get a clearer picture on this.

 

Danr I allready have a clear picture, you fail to see what I have been asking though, I am not saying either way if it happend or not.
Stu I believe that someone earlier on mentioned that they had killed people to keep this a secret so again we are back to scale LOL how many is it moraly ok to kill to hide a goverment cover up? 1 or a thousand?

It was Danr who said and I quote

There was a bit about some untimely deaths of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_1 of 3 astronauts who may have been talkers. And the guy who died in an "accident" soon after he tried to alert congress of the problems at NASA. Anyway the article overloaded the servers

And of course why go to all the trouble of saying you have been to the moon in the 1st place? what was the advantage of it? It sure did not take peoples minds of Vietnam except for the few days during the 1st landing So what exactly was the gain?

With the 9/11 attacks I could come up with a reason for some agency orchestrating it, well a few to be honest but I can not think of a single viable reason for faking the moon landings

 

I for one never said that the 911 report was on the up and up so am not sure where you are going with that. As for motivation for faking the moon landing the article has a lot on that.

 

Danr were did I say that you did say that???? Please take a moment to actualy read what I am saying and then comment
I quoted directly from your text about the death of people involved in the moon landings, now did you see a mention of 9/11 attributed to yourself??

 

I an pretty dubious of that happening. I haven;t seen anything that would lead me to question it anyway...unlike a lot of other things about the moon landing.

Democracy good. Communism bad.

 

Idicates? Mebtioning his name is not and indication. And even so, its not proof positive. So all this really is is speculation. And who would Kissinger trust in the Nixon administration?

 

Earlier you made mention of 911 as a comparison. It is tough to relate to what your saying since it is disconnected from the article.

 

All we have is speculation on all sides of this.

 

What Danr you mean a bit like you refusing to answer my simple question about the Nobel peace prize and going off on a tangent? Is that what you mean? LOL

Ps I still never mentiond you having said anything about 9/11 though did I?

 

post 21
post 26
post 39
post 44
post46

..in fact you have posted more about 911 than the moon landing. It is getting to be a bit much, if you are posting on this thread at least you could read the article.

 

And who says I have not read it?? now show me were I have said that you mentioned 9/11 thats what you accused me of Danr

Also try reading what I actualy wrote I asked a simple question and responded to replies, so what is your problem?

Post 21 asked a simple question

#24 responded
#26 responded
#29 responded
#33 responded
#35
#39 responded
#44 responded
#46 responded
#51 responded

And am now responding, I have not made a single claim in amy of my posts Danr so what is your problem??

You on the other hand have made a claim that you can not validate and I quote from post # 27

the big difference is that we will know for certain on the moon thing because it will be verifiable with soon to come tech, that is not really the case with 9-11.

How exactly do you know that we will know for certain if the technology is not available right now?

 

It may be available, but I'd like to keep it on topic (moon landing not 911)

 

Remind me to pull you every time you now stray of topic on any other post

 

Wow...there are folks that can still think, analyze, and not afraid to speak. I'm somewhat encouraged. Lemmings...Thurston...beware.

 

Speculation doesnt make it so. Ive heard speculation that Ronald Reagan gave Errol Flynn occasional hand jobs. Is it true?

 

did yo read the article. It seems to me that the guy who says that we went to the moon with 1960's tech is the one out on a speculative limb.

 

Congratulations Gilligan. 40 pages of your lies finally paid off with one member of this forum joining the truther dark side, further weakening the country.

 

Yeah we don't wanna do that do we? That's the elite's job! Thanks skipper.