How Obamacare Undercuts Existing Health Insurance and Obama You might want to read this and see what was the real path for one of the most important part of your future. Pep
OK. I'll have to read the rest of the article when I finish rinsing the throw up out of my mouth. What a bunch of nonsense! Do the Koch brothers know what they are getting for their investment of millions of dollars in Right wing drivel like this? Here are the main points of the article that supposedly address how "Obamacare undercuts existing health insurance". Americans find themselves in this situation because of three things. (1) First, the PPACA itself requires changes in existing coverage. (Yes you idiot, that was the point of changing the law to require insurance companies to cover more people. How does that "undercut" my insurance? It makes it better.) (2) Second, the regulations that are triggered by the PPACA severely limit what is considered to be existing coverage. (Severely limits what is considered existing coverage? Explain this! How does it do this and what do you mean by severely?) (3) And Americans’ anxiety and uncertainty are fueled by the confusing “guidance” that accompanies the regulations (So now my insurance is being undercut because of "Americans' anxiety and uncertainty"???? What they hell is this idiot saying) Could this guy make more non-points? I couldn't get through the entire article because the logic twists and turns so badly it fails to have any cohesion at all. Maybe somebody else can make sense of this acrobatic nonsense.
A job in sight MOEN ; Maybe you could convince them to let you redact the article ,and write a new one. Some never get it until their wallet in finally empty.
Neither you nor you comrade bothered to address any points in the article as I did. You simply hold it up as if you understand it while one can almost hear you saying, See! See! Don't tell me that I don't get something when you haven't even proven that you understand what this Hoff guy has written. You don't understand is my guess but you do feel smug enough to try and lecture me about the financial consequences I'll face if I don't heed the warning of this author's article that you clearly don't understand. Do you even know anything about the Heritage Foundation?
I seriously doubt either of you read the article and I know neither of you understand the little you may have read.
Does either one of you plan to ever address the content of the article that one of YOU posted? I seem to be the only with that ability here.
For MOEN MAHER Twenty Seven States Attorney`s General have sued the Federal Government over Obama Care. You can read that on Heritage also , while you submit your resume.
A. That's not true, there is no such thng as Obama care. B. You don't even have the ability to comment intelligently on an article you posted. C. If the Right wingers at the Heritage Foundation are against something, I am for it.
