Who Here Thinks Michele Bachmann's Husband can Ungay People?

And I thought she was a Minnesota loon. Now I know where she gets it from.

Michele Bachmann's Husband: Gays are "Barbarians"
The husband of presidential candidate Michele Bachmann thinks gays are "barbarians" who "need to be educated" in order to stop being gay.
The website ThinkProgress.org unearthed an audio clip of Dr. Marcus Bachmann explaining his position on homosexuality last year.
The site writes of Dr. Bachmann:
Dr. Marcus Bachmann, who has described himself as his wife’s “strategist,” runs a Christian-based counseling center in Minnesota that has been rumored to offer reparative treatment for those looking to “ungay” themselves.
The GOP candidate hasn't said anything specifically about these comments, but Bachmann did say earlier this week that she thinks marriage should be between a man and a woman, and supports a constitutional amendment defining marriage as such.

Here are the comments Dr. Bachmann made on the Point of View Radio Talk Show in May 2010:[video]http://youtu.be/D8oyA5JV7kA[/video]

 

Maybe he can un-gay that gay biker gang that is terrorizing tomc

 

OMG! Just what is it that terrifies you about Bachmann? I will bet she even knows the ages of all her kids.

 

What terrifies me? What doesn't?

View attachment 201

 

As opposed to?

 

Here we go again. What a baby. Never mind the absurdity of the thread. It's like you just defend anything moen objects to. No matter the subject. You can't just comment on the stupidity of such a claim. Or that the guy calls gays barbarians instead of keeping his mouth shut. Oh I guess since you don't object to such BS, you must agree with it, but just too frigging chicken to speak for yourself.

.

 

That's a very nice picture. Thank you for sharing it.

 

If we are actually asking who here thinks people can be un-gayed....the only person that would come to my mind right off the bat would be tomc. So I am hoping he gives his take on un-gaying.

 

Happy to oblige. People can't be "un-gayed". The wires were crossed at birth and that's just the way it is. I believe Bachmann believes she can. She probably just smokes pot though and can't see clearly, and, she's a republican. Reality has long abandoned her when she decided to become republican.

 

How can you say such things about her, you guys have so much in common.

But thanks for the straight answer without a dodge. That's a rarity here.

 

Thanks for the comparison. Politics aside...she's a whack job. Oh....point taken. Thanks again.

 

Wait a second. You said the wires were crossed at birth in this thread. But in another you claimed it was a lifestyle(like being a nudist or a gym rat.) If thats the way it is, how are they cramming their behavior down your throat? Dont be like the other guys in this forum. For the love of God man!

 

I find no inconsistency in my comments. It is a lifestyle engaged in by people whose wires were crossed at birth. You apparently define "lifestyle" as the inverse of something non optional. I define lifestyle as simply a description of the way one lives. Lifestyle further describes the manner in which they live, chosen or not. You can be born with your wires crossed and still maintain a certain "lifestyle", optional or otherwise. One doesn't diminish or negate the existence of the other. Where's the contradiction? Apparently, only in your interpretation of what I posted.

 

Not my interpertation. Yours. Do you expect or demand that gays live a non gay lifestyle. And what would that be. What option would you prefer them to live?

 

In the privacy of their own environment, I say "live" away. Knock yourself out and all that. Perhaps it would be of use to designate one or the other at some point though. Like male or female. Then perhaps the option of where to live, community wise, could be better assessed and resolved in the interests of all. What one does in their personal lives doesn't require my approval or disapproval. We're all free to do as we choose, sexuality wise, in the comforts of our own homes. It is something else to impose that preference onto others that disagree with it. When in Rome....

 

What the are you talking about? Its ok to be GAY, but only in your house?

 

I'm saying it's ok to do whatever you want to do behind closed doors as far as sexuality. In public, conforming to society takes priority.
Ever hear of MAMBLA? (or whatever the initials). They think it's ok to be a "little boy lover". That ok with you? Maybe you would like to see a fifty year old guy smooching all over an eight year old boy in public, at the table next to you next time you eat out? Maybe a lap dance would be ok in your view? Ridiculous? I think not. You're basically accepting the same thing. You're allowing the minority of society to dictate to the majority of society. You want to be flamboyant and flaunt your gayness? Do it at home. You want to love little boys? (hey...we're talking strictly being recognized and legal to do so...right?), do that somewhere else too. The human anatomy enables humans to reproduce via a man and a woman. Exit chutes on males with other males, are supposed to only be exit holes, and since men can't impregnate other men (naturally), then I think it's safe to say that marriage was instituted with the idea of man and woman in mind, and I'm also quite sure the 'MAN ON MAN' scenario wasn't even considered. Marriage is a man and a woman. Want to join gays in holy matrimony? Call it gay marriage then. I'd be cool with that. Make all the Hallmark cards say 'Congratulations on your gay marriage'. I'm cool with that too. I'm not cool with equating traditional marriage with gay marriage, any more than I'd be cool with man marries small boy and calling that traditional marriage.

 

Tom NEVER knows what he's talking about!

 

I know all I need to know. I can't help it if your comprehension level is sub par.

 

That about sums it up. You "know all you need to know" and are unwilling to learn anything new. That's why you rode the little yellow bus to school, Tom.