Andrew Breitbart Dead of AIDS at 83

Sorry, I just wanted to misrepresent his death in a fitting tribute to his work in life.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/andrew-breitbart-publisher-author-dead/story?id=15824337

 

Why did you choose AIDS to misrepresent as the cause of this man's death?

 

'

 

Have some respect, man.

 

Both he and America are in a better place.

 

Do you really need to ask a question like that? Just remember who the poster is the one who wanted to "burn down the capitol building"because he disagreed with the governor.

 

Just curious, but has any conservative here wished harm to the liberals? Yet everyone of the regular liberals has do so to the conservatives. I wonder .........?

 

The title of this thread is an outright lie. Moen even admits its a misrepresentation. Unless Moen has credible sources stating the cause of death as AIDS, I believe the title of this thread is in violation of this site's Terms of Service.

 

His sleazy life's work just makes that so hard. We reap what we sew. No tears here.

 

Many liberals I've encountered have very little respect for life either pre-birth or post-birth. Obviously, that appears to be the case here, too.

 

Well, no, you don't have to cry for the man. Everyone knows you despised him. But, don't be so petty as to misrepresent the cause of his death. That's just... scummy.

 

I have a video that has been mainpulated and altered to make it look like he died at 83 of AIDS. Is that good enough for you. I know that he would have appreciated it.

 

And extreme apropos.

 

But befitting of the poster ..........

 

How exactly do you wish harm on a dead guy? I think he is a little past that point right now. Shirley Sherrod on the other hand is still dealing with the damage he caused her.

 

Please post that video.

 

How can you say Moen is lying abut the cause of Breitbart's reaching room temperature when Moen clearly states at the outset that it's a misrepresentation designed to characterize Moen's view of the late propagandist's career? What exactly is he lying about in this case? The only way I can see that it would be a lie is if he had omitted the disclaimer, which he clearly didn't.

 

By doing just what you have done. Oh, and then there are Walker and Cheney that I know of.

 

A lie is a lie is a lie. The reasoning for doing so does not make it the truth. If it is not a lie, please show me where Breitbart became 83 let alone had AIDS.

 

I see. So even when you clearly state that what you are saying is not true, you are still obliged to defend it as if it as if you had asserted that it was true.