I am sure you will find lots of things in the near future that you will believe are anything but boring. I suspect I will have lots of references to this clip.
Sheesh! These guys need more ammo to work with, so I think I'll throw 'em a bone: In 2000, an idiotic, coke-snorting drunkard made Al Gore appear to be made of granola. Sure wish we went with granola there. In 2004, that same idiotic, coke-snorting drunkard ...who had recently invaded a country for no good reason, the worst decision I've ever witnessed a President make by the way... made John Kerry appear to be made of cardboard, though in this case, he may actually be made out of cardboard. I've never seen someone so damn dull. That said, I would have gladly put up with his dullness for 4 years.
So what is your point, You want more exciting socialist like Hitler. Or more exciting Communists like Castro. What is your point?
Bush Jr. snorted cocaine. That's a fact. How does that imply "I don't have a problem with presidents snorting cocaine"? Where did I say I did? Where did I say I didn't? Why would that even be the focus of the issue, why make it that? I'll tell you why: Because you have nothing else to go on. That's why I pointed out Gore and Kerry, in how they are just as bad or worse than Romney bland-wise, to give you something you could actually use, but instead you want to talk about cocaine usage lol You can lead a horse to water... lol
Didn't BO say he tried coke & maybe even participated in the selling of it while in college? You can't disparage one for drug usage without disparaging the other.
Yep!! However, only about 50% of the population thing Junior used cocaine. I wonder which 50% that might be!
Once again, I didn't say it was a good thing, and I didn't say it was a bad thing. If Obama snorted coke then it would be fair to say he's "coke-snorting". Did I "disparage" Jr? Yes, I did. But are you suggesting snorting-coke isn't worthy of being disparged? Mind you, I'm agreeing that if Obama snorted coke the term also applies to him. For the record though: I don't like Jr., especially his Presidency. It is my opinion that that "good-ol' boy" has caused more harm to America than good. His insistance to invade Iraq was an example of the worst of America's behaviors, how too much power in the wrong hands can lead to very bad things. And don't get me started on his other two halves (yes, I know, pun intended) Cheney and Rumsfeld. Where Jr. was simply idiotic, those two were absolutely diabolical.
Wrap your head around this: Then it's a safe bet to say half the people are absolutely correct and half are idiots. Therefore, it's also a safe bet to say that the half that are idiots believe the other half is wrong... but they'd be mistaken 'cause they're idiots. Want more? Those that are not idiots understood what I said, while those who are idiots misinterpretted it to support their argument. More? Why are you still reading this? If you haven't figured it out yet you're an idiot. If you have figured it out, keep it to yourself.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_W._Bush_substance_abuse_controversy ...again... Why not? It's a simple answer, "yes" or "no", an answer Obama wasn't afraid to give. Doesn't that mean Obama is more honest with himself and the American people? Doesn't that mean Jr. has a tendency to hide the truth from himself and the American people?
Why would I? I like Obama! At least he isn't an idiot like Jr.! But maybe I'll start "tagging" Reagan like that now... just because the old fool deserves the disrespect... ...Ronald Reagan, the coke-snortin' fool!!! I like it, it has a certain ring to it.
So your evidence is Wikipedia, anonymous sources & a lack of denial on Bush's part? I've taken enough law classes to know that wouldn't even hold up on the Peoples Court.
Dunno, it just seems if both guys are guilty of the same behavior (in your eyes) it would be fair to apply the tag equally? That is, unless you suffer from Obama Infatuation Syndrome and give BO a pass for doing something you disparage Bush for doing. Is that the kind of person you are?