It Has Begun

Absolutely divorced from reality, but I guess that doesn't really matter

 

I’m so amused that our resident socialist favors presidents more for what they say than what they do.

. . . And his failure to realize that, at the time he accepted funds for his services, Homan was not assured of an administration seat in the next presidency.

. . . And that he does not believe enemies of Trump are enemies of America. Of course . . . Like the rest of his kind he’s so focused on Trump in particular that he fails to see the widespread destruction in the wake of his favored movements.

 

Why is this divorced from leftist violence?

 

"Authorizing full force" on Americans in America is a first, and kind of a big deal

 

Our resident socialist fails to recognize that full force has been authorized before, and that this is not a first. He also fails to acknowledge that those he advocates for are criminals, defying the laws of the United States of America.

 

Ah, precedence makes it right, is that what I'm to understand? What was that precedent again? Kent State?

 

"Full force, if necessary" is implicit in invocation of the Insurrection Act . . . the necessity being determined by the extent to which the crowd fails to control itself.

As to precedents for use of the Insurrection Act, the socialist's sensationalist mention of Kent State does not apply, as that was not a presidential order. Invocations of the Insurrection Act go far beyond a single instance, including but not limited to the following:

• Whiskey Rebellion (1794): President George Washington called up militias to suppress a tax rebellion.

• Labor disputes (19th century): Several presidents, including Rutherford Hayes and Grover Cleveland, deployed troops during strikes, usually siding with employers.

• Little Rock, Arkansas (1957): President Dwight D. Eisenhower used the Act to send federal troops to enforce the desegregation of schools.

• Alabama and Mississippi (1962–1965): Presidents John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson deployed troops to enforce civil rights laws.

• Detroit, Michigan (1967): President Lyndon B. Johnson federalized the National Guard to quell riots.

• Washington, D.C. (1968): President Johnson again deployed federal troops following the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr.

• Los Angeles, California (1992): President George H.W. Bush invoked the Act at the request of the governor to quell riots following the Rodney King verdict.

• Portland, Oregon (2025): The current president, Donald Trump, threatened to use "full force, if necessary" against protestors in Portland but did not define what that meant. Oregon's governor and Portland's mayor denounced the move, arguing there was no insurrection. Legal experts questioned the legality and constitutionality of any action taken beyond what is permitted under the Insurrection Act.

​

If those in the crowd want to get unruly, as seems to get them the attention they desire, it will get them attention they do not want as well.

Nothing's free . . . You've got to take the bad with the good.

 

Be serious. Have you seen the "crowd" in question?

 

Yup . . . If you think you personally would throw rocks, bricks or bottles at a building, attempt to set the building ablaze, or attempt to interfere with ICE agents arresting suspects without being held to account for any of those actions, you are a moron.

 

They need the military... for like, 15 people? Is ICE that incompetent? Actually, don't answer that.

 

Stop feigning ignorance . . . ICE is not empowered to deal with anyone other than illegal immigrants. Of course, you'd like nothing better than for them to overstep their bounds and open the door to another frivolous liberal lawsuit.

 

I thought anyone with a brain would figure out the difference between the country under Biden and under Trump. I thought anyone interested in becoming informed could finally see the truth about the purpose of Rent-A-Mob protesters, brain washed young children, and enemies of MY COUNTRY'S morals, traditions, history, and language (Pre Muslim NoBAMA). But no. @GeneWright continues to prove over-and-over that HE IS ONE OF THEM.

 

They're already doing that every day.

This is literally the group that he's sending the troops in for with "full force"



It's quite clearly just a pretext to send troops in and escalate. He's hoping to raise the temperature by forcing a reaction he can be "justified" in brutally responding to.

 

Choosing to live and work overseas, he clearly isn't content with America as-is. Good to have him elsewhere.

You are a sensationalist BS'ser. Full Force is only to be resorted to, if necessary.

It is right to pre-authorize such a response because of the violence resorted to by Antifa, BLM and other liberal-espoused fringe groups in the past. Will it necessarily be used? No, but you sure want everyone to believe it will . . .

Quit your crap, liberals! You won't tolerate conservatism, and you will tolerate this behavior? How uncivilized!

 

Personally I don’t consider violent criminals to be Americans. They are animals. Just Friday I was taking my boy to the coast and stopped at a roadside burger stand and walked in the bathroom with him as I always do because it is necessary in today’s environment. And sure enough a tweaked out creep was in the bathroom speaking ninety miles a minute unintelligibly and held out his hand. I think my stern glare got through to him because he turned and walked out….. But imagine I had allowed my twelve year old to go in that restroom alone! Bravo to our POTUS in his efforts to get these creeps out of civilized societies midst.

 

I don't see any ICE agents in the image you posted. I should think your Chinese handlers would have instructed you better.

 

From Trump's talk to the governor of Oregon. Just let this sink in:

"I spoke to the governor, she was very nice," Trump said. "But I said, 'Well wait a minute, am I watching things on television that are different from what's happening? My people tell me different.' They are literally attacking and there are fires all over the place...it looks like terrible."

Who's whispering in his ear to do this? Clearly he's not being told the truth of the situation. In a weird way it's making me sad for him like Biden near the end.

 

This sort of diversion only works if you had been forthright about Biden when he “killed Medicare” and the like….. I don’t know what conversation this was pulled from but I have watched the man speak enough to know that he is dealing with a full deck.

 

It must be a Reddit regurgitation . . .

 

He's not getting good info though clearly. He says as much here.