It Has Begun

Multiple news outlets that reviewed the diary entries report the same key passage:

• On January 26, 2020, Fauci wrote that the first known COVID‑19 infection “was not connected to the (wet) market” and that the market was “not the source, it was the amplifier.”
  

This means he believed the market helped spread the virus but was not where it originally jumped to humans.

 

Have you read the passage from the diary? Fauci said the wet market was not the source. Are you disputing what he wrote?

Or are you going to plead the Fifth?

 

It matters not how devilishly evil a man is. If he flies the liberal flag, the wagons will circle around him. I defy you to ever find a lib say anything remotely critical of a fellow lib…….. Cultish behavior much?

 

I believe I once heard Nancy Pelosi say that Hillary was a like a dried-up dead fish in bed. Pretty sure I heard that. Or not.

 

Yes, first known

In January of 2020

God forbid he didn't know everything about it a month after it started. What did anyone know in January 2020? To this day we actually still don't know (and never will) who the true patient zero was.

 

No, he was pretty damned sure of himself and the science when he noted in his daily typewritten notes that the first infection occurred in early December 2019 and was not connected to the market, writing: "It now appears using epi data and genomic data that the first infection was in early December [2019] and was not connected to the (wet) market" and "Now we know the market was not the source, it was the amplifier."

He uses the words "now we know..." Not "maybe know". Not "possibly know". Not "perhaps know". He says "now we know". The words are simple, yet quite profound in their meaning. Fauci himself said the he was "the science". Certainly he did his scientific research before making such a statement, right? Maybe you would like to say that he didn't study it long enough. If that's the case, he is not really "the science" after all, right?

Please don't tell me you're going to dispute his words in some sort of "it depends on the what the meaning of the word 'is' is..." verbal dodge.

Perhaps its past time you came to the realization that the wet market theory was an entire load of horse**** that politicians (and Fauci) fed to people like you in order to further a political agenda.

Do you still believe that wet market lie? Wake up, dude! Don't be such a marooooooooon!

 

He was speculating in his journal, a month after the first infection. Are you nuts?

 

Wow, you certainly drank the Kool-Aid, didn’t you? What could possibly make you think he was being speculative? “Speculative” doesn’t sound very scientific to me. It sounds like he pretty well nailed it down from scientific evaluation. Well, unless he wasn’t following the science, of course… but, you would never admit THAT is even a possibility, would you?

 

Based on the way you're talking, I'm not even sure you know what "science" is

 

The man was far to self consumed with his own fame to be objective enough to practice any real science….. And you thought Trump wrote the book on narcissism.