Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: >Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: >>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: >>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: [...] >>>>What I like most of all about your statement is that you indicate that >>>>any paging-style flames are crap whilst leaving your own paging-style >>>>lame attributed to yourself. You don't get much dumber than that. >>> >>><undoubtedly boring drivel> >> >>I can see why > >Then why write? To humiliate you. The last two reply cycles have seen you snip and run, which is very reminiscent of your performance all those months ago. Job well done, again. -- Timmay! "You've followed me thread to thread, ng to ng (including those you claim you don't read) for the last year, spanktoy." Paranoid Burton imagines stalkers in <259v3uc2um3vbs74s9glrn2kgh22b4mfkj@4ax.com>
DIMMY THorne Being boring is humiliating: was: #flonk IRC chat On Mon, 05 May 2008 14:38:51 +0100, in the land of alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: >Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: >>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: >>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: >>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: >[...] >>>>>What I like most of all about your statement is that you indicate that >>>>>any paging-style flames are crap whilst leaving your own paging-style >>>>>lame attributed to yourself. You don't get much dumber than that. >>>> >>>><undoubtedly boring drivel> >>> >>>I can see why >> >>Then why write? > >To humiliate you. Nothing like a Dimmy Thorne delusion of victory. Do tell Dimmy, in one sentence or less, you boring stump, how you being lame, boring and delusional could be humiliating to anyone other than you. -- A Number 1, Grade A, Prime USDA 'Ratz Accept No Substitute
Does The Spankard Want a Second Bite At The Cherry? Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: >Timmay! ><timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: > >>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: >>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: >>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: >>>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: >>[...] >>>>>>What I like most of all about your statement is that you indicate that >>>>>>any paging-style flames are crap whilst leaving your own paging-style >>>>>>lame attributed to yourself. You don't get much dumber than that. >>>>> >>>>><undoubtedly boring drivel> >>>> >>>>I can see why >>> >>>Then why write? >> >>To humiliate you. > >Nothing like a Dimmy Thorne delusion of victory. Here's a replay for you. Lets see if you have the cajones to pick it up this time. Xref: news alt.flame:1128253 alt.usenet.kooks:1720811 alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk:1088207 alt.fucknozzles:88183 Path: news.alt.net From: Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk,alt.fucknozzles Subject: Re: Timmay is literally Burnore's bitch. Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 00:33:21 +0100 Organization: Altopia Corp. - Usenet Access - www.altopia.com Lines: 517 Message-ID: <v9l5g3hb5daq885rnil9hpe9ej2cq22qtm@4ax.com> References: <v9mlf3p778p3b7ee3r2d63fg01t8g4ov16@4ax.com> <hc2mf3dvshvtsi4klan7qo63m9vajeq0nu@4ax.com> <atlqf3phjin83kq2am6lcrnsmdq0b1fpl5@4ax.com> <28nqf39dcbv21utg1mq1t90toe7jphkldi@4ax.com> <bm2rf3dik2gp0t5j0vpfr1kgeau1t5k3dk@4ax.com> <gohrf35ijgagssd6tl7s3irvnigt0lbtpv@4ax.com> <hijvf3lj8u7odba1j30j4egm3fs129if4p@4ax.com> <vpkvf3trkmb53dv8v7o3aucdpokavdnt1i@4ax.com> <ljs2g31j07cnil6j6r3r80o2pv35bqv3ng@4ax.com> <8dt2g3dnip6nsuf0ar0ng6ah7t2un9pe2g@4ax.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118 Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: >Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: >>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: >>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: >>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: >>>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: >>>>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: >>>>>>[...] >>>>>>>>Still only one stupid kook in sight. This has to be a first. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Wow, my credibility just took a hit. >>>>>> >>>>>>You never had any in the first place. >>>>> >>>>>Not like you could think of a line with out me feeding you with sarcasm. >>>> >>>>If you wanna wear a big sign that screams 'kick me', its best not to >>>>whine about being kicked, unless you enjoy whining? <--------------------------- Short yellow bus riders read here >>> >>>Where's the whining, moron? Specifically point out the term or phrase >>>you believe to be a whine. Just want to be able to pinpoint where in >>>your education the teachers went wrong. My current theory is they >>>actually felt you were educable. >> >>There has been a mysterious pattern to my posts for the past decade. > >Stupidity, lameness and complete lack of humor. You asked for directions to your whining, you whining witless wonder. You were given directions for your whining. Now you're whining about being given directions to your whining. Can't you do anything but whine? Its tediously fucking boring. Do you realise how dull it is to plod through your posts, kicking your lazy, unimaginative arse all over alt.flame? Its so one-sided it isn't funny. >>Someone makes a comment, I follow it with another comment. Generally >>the two comments have a theme and can be thought of as part of the >>same 'conversation'. I think I've given you too much of a clue. Do you >>require more help pinpointing it? If so, please board the short yellow >>bus and wipe the drool from your chin when you board. > >Translation: Puke up any ole delusional gibberish and call it a (f)lame. All aboard the short yellow bus. Next stop, basic english comprehension for unimaginitive cretins, where you'll be getting off. >>>>>You are pathetic. It is like when everyone gets bored with these >>>>>monotonic lames you claim to be flames and walks away shaking their >>>>>head, you then prance and preen claiming your victory once more. >>>> >>>>It is hardly difficult to outwit someone posting from AUK. >>> >>>I am, wow, this sure looks like aav3f. But this is your fantasy, do continue. >> >>It might be crossposted there, but you subscribe to and read AUK. > >Really? How can you be sure? Oh, that's right, you follow people >around usenet. Sharon said the same thing and she got spanked over it. Every time she plucks up the courage to post to alt.flame, she finds me there to punt her back into oblivion. Being the generous person I am I'm going to allow you to drop it and never mention it again. This is a one time offer. So what's it to be? Do I follow people around Usenet or are you a paranoid pillock who wants to spend some Usenet time being my bitch? >>You'd be reading this from AUK if I cut aav3f. Of course you could >>still deny that you read AUK, but we both know that would be futile. > >But you didn't did you. Funny you make a lot of delusional claims but >you never can quite back them up. I've got no need to back anything up because you've not stated anything that needed refuting. Now, if you were to state that you didn't read AUK, which you've been extremely hesitant to say, then I might have to wade in and prove you to be a liar. Roll the dice and make your choice. >>>>They usually display markedly lower than average deductive reasoning, >>> >>>I can see where you could get that impression. >> >>That's not a very nice thing to say about your fellow AUK'ers. Do they >>know you hold them in such a low esteem? Hmmmm. No response, obviously correct. <guffaw> >>>The problem is that you write it, people point and laugh at you, you >>>then post more delusional screed. Not like it requires AC Doyle to >>>deduce you are a half-wit. >> >>The people doing the pointing and laughing are the very same people >>that give you an impression of having a lower than average ability in >>deductive reasoning. > >Ah, the context snip with the follow-up based upon the changed >context. How cute, useless bute cute. I am sure self styled flamers >enjoy being characterized as cute. > >Which explains why deductive reasoning is not required for your posts, >half-wit. There was no context snip, you utterly confused spastic. Here I make a remark about AUK'ers: >"They usually display markedly lower than average deductive reasoning," You snip my sentence and reply with: >"I can see where you could get that impression." There is nothing unambiguous about your reply. Its not cut. Its not taken out of context. It cannot be interpreted any other way. If you meant to say something different, you did a fucking poor job of it. If you can't express yourself properly then unplug your keyboard and get the fuck out of here. You clearly don't belong. >>Am I supposed to be upset that a bunch of people >>we both agree to have markedly low intelligence called me a few names >>and don't think highly of me? I'll just grab that box of tissues... > >Well, you have been quite *regular* in your spewing to usenet, ever >since you were named "Burnore's Bitch". So yeah, evidence does support >that conclusion. There is no evidence of anything except your craziness, kook. You're reaching the bottom of the barrel and have even taken to claiming I'm following people around Usenet. Don't you realise how completely laughable your statement is? You're completely kooking out. >>>>subnormally low intelligence, virtually no creativity and they can't >>>>quite grasp the point that they are inferior creatures to the rest of >>>>the population. Victory is assured before I post. >>> >>>Nothing like demonstrating that I am right. >>>Did you do that whole "staying alive" bit? >> >>Forgive me for not knowing what the fuck you're babbling about when >>you make an obscure reference to some 70s film. > >Not like it is hard to get one by you, eh, Dimmy. > >Hint: You claimed *victory", right on schedule. Which given your >preening egoist nature would require a *victory dance*. Travolta would >seem right up your alley. Victory *is* assured. The human flith emanating from AUK isn't capable of mounting a challenge for longer than a couple of reply cycles. >>>>>It is amazing the convolutions of logic that the hard of thinking must >>>>>go through to create a world where they are anything but what reality >>>>>says they are. Yes, Dimmy, that would be you. Delusions of adequacy >>>>>dance in that teacup sized brain. >>>> >>>>"From: a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com >>>>Subject: My wife complains about my small cock ALL THE TIME!" >>>> >>>>Please don't send me any further email. Thank you. >>> >>>"I know, I'll make up something and everyone will believe Ratz is >>>emailing me" >>> >>>No kook ever tried that one before. >> >>I can see why you'd think that. > >Yes, you are that stupid. PeeWee Herman wants his repertoire back. >> You do display markedly lower than >>average deductive reasoning and subnormally low intelligence. > >*snicker* I thought it was funny too. Its pretty sad you're laughing at it while proving it in almost every sentence. >>My comment has precipated a rather irrational comment from you to such a >>jovial gag. I guess I touched a nerve. > >If you are delusional, then you could make that assumption. But again, >you seem to lost something in your translation of English to Dimmy. I didn't actually the aim the gag that high, but it seems to have missed you by some distance. I'm coming to the conclusion that if I had to aim to hit you, it wouldn't be going skywards. >>>I obviously was being far too kind when I used pathetic. > >No response, obviously correct. <guffaw> >>>>>>>Dayam, what shall I do, deary me, called a kook, by a multi-award winner. >>>>>> >>>>>>Hopefully you'll get the message that constantly making yourself a >>>>>>laughing stock with these tepid displays of your mediocre (f)laming >>>>>>talent and endeavour to dive in front of a bus, allowing spam to >>>>>>improve the signal to noise ratio in AF. >>>>> >>>>>What flaming, Dimmy? >>>> >>>>Exactly. >>> >>>Dimmy, I had to feed you the line, again. Just so I could point out you >>>could not tell a flame if it was a ten pound wart attached to your nose. >> >>Could you whine a little louder about setting yourself up for an easy >>shot? There's someone in the next solar system who hasn't heard you. > >So how is the wart these days? Do you notice it any more? Your mom is fine. She send her regards and says she'll change your diaper when she gets back from the two week holiday. Hopefully you won't have attracted that many flies and suffocated on them by then. >>>>>Sarcasm and pointing out your lack of skills in any arena could hardly >>>>>be called flaming. Toss in that a moron like you imagines anyone is >>>>>subbing alt.lame just makes it that much more pathetic. >>>> >>>>You got something to say about alt.flame? You don't have the balls. >>> >>>So you can't read either or just begging for help? >> >>I knew you'd weasel out of making any more comments about 'alt.lame'. > >"Toss in that a moron like you imagines anyone is subbing alt.lame >just makes it that much more pathetic. " Its the SAME fucking comment, you crainially-challenged clown. I said any MORE comments. You're so utterly lacking in any creative ability that you can't write anything new. Click your heels together three times, Dorothy. You're off to Oz to ask the wizard for an imagination. >>You just don't have the spine. You're so easy to manipulate. Do you >>see how easy it is to control a weak-minded fool like you? > >That I called alt.flame, alt.lame and declared it dead was not enough? > >No one came to your rescue, even with that pathetic mewl for help. > >Now beg for more help, Dimmy. Since you're in the mood to continue to do my bidding, how about you saddle on over to the fridge and get me a beer? >>>>>I suppose winning all your kook awards was somewhat disturbing, for >>>>>such a weak minded sot as yourself, but I am sure the train went all >>>>>the way off the tracks when you realized how many people consider you >>>>>an obsessive stalking froot loop and made you Gary's personal punch bag. >>>> >>>>I think its pretty funny. >>> >>>So do *we*. You froth and claim victory, you win awards, *we* laugh. >> >>The people handing out the 'awards' are the very same people that give >>you an impression of having a lower than average ability in deductive >>reasoning. Am I supposed to be upset that a bunch of people we both >>agree to have markedly low intelligence called me a kook and don't >>think highly of me? I'll just grab a second box of tissues... > >Sad. Lets see if you can make it through the next post without mentioning 'frothing', 'laming' or 'delusional', you uncreative little twerp. >>>>You have to consider the situation. >>> >>>You obsess constantly about Gary, that would be the situation. It has >>>now been officially recognized. Ergo the much higher visibility from you. >> >>I do no such thing you silly little man. I read a couple of newsgroups >>and if the kiddie-diddling imbecile happens to pop up in those groups, >>I bait the idiot and watch half a dozen loons from his flea circus try >>to defend him. I know its not very sporting or difficult, but hey, I >>find it fun. > >See, you obsess about Burnore. You can't even make it through a post >with out some reference to Gary. We went for ten posts without mentioning Burnore in this thread, so your statement is incorrect. If you'd said "I can't make it through five posts without mentioning Burnore." that would be factually correct. You do realise you're the one who has constantly brought up his name in this thread, don't you? >>>>A bunch of neanderthals who've yet to walk upright >>> >>>So I can add Paleoanthropology to the list of which you are wholly >>>ignorant. If you are going to lame people, Dimmy, at least try to have >>>a basic understanding of the words you are using. >> >>I seem to have touched a nerve there. I suppose paleoanthropology is >>useful to you so you can identify your family and friends. > >"I touched a nerve there" >You probably actually believe that you did. That your lame was based >upon complete ignorance, well that is quite okay with you. Ignorance >is your watchword. It was late, I was tired, scratch one point up to you. I'm quite confident the multitude of points I'm beating you on are more than enough to see you off. >>[...] > >*SNORT* >And so begins the run and hide of Dimmy the coward. Up til now all was >good, then you got your tit in the wringer with a load of ignorant >twaddle and suddenly Dimmy needs to trim and make the bad words go >away. I can always count on that from you, Dimmy. What next spelling >lames? I'll leave those to you. "Have you picked up a dictionary, ever?" <evnne1ls4voub9bq0b0o7ei2e14ddo41cf@4ax.com> "Do try to keep up Mr. Illiteracy." <evnne1ls4voub9bq0b0o7ei2e14ddo41cf@4ax.com> "Literacy is not something you can put on a resume." <evnne1ls4voub9bq0b0o7ei2e14ddo41cf@4ax.com> Don't let the door hit you on the way out. >>>> Burnore can't wander into any newsgroup >>>>without someone slinging the 'child molester' tag at him. >>> >>>Usually due to some obsessive fuckwit following him around. I'll bet >>>you have that whole google alerts thing set up just for Gary. >> >><rolls eyes> >> >>Having googled my profile you know I read just two newsgroups. > >Well, Mr. Ego is lose today. "Literacy is not something you can put on a resume." <evnne1ls4voub9bq0b0o7ei2e14ddo41cf@4ax.com> <guffaw> >No, Dimmy, I didn't but this, again, is your delusion, do continue: You should. You'll find the delusion is all yours. You'll find that it was you who brought Burnore into the flurry of posts between us. Lets see what the dictionary says about delusion: 'Psychiatry. a fixed false belief that is resistant to reason or confrontation with actual fact: a paranoid delusion.' If we couple this with the rampant paranoia that thinks I'm following people around Usenet (you can pony up some proof any time now) then we're beginning to see some downright kooky behaviour from you. >>How you can deduce from that obsessive behaviour I don't know. > >The fact you inject Burnore in everything. Fact: You brought Burnore into this thread, not me. >>I think you're firmly in the bracket of having a lower than average >>ability in deductive reasoning and markedly low intelligence. Some >>might even say your deduction is downright kooky. > >Ah, Dimmy, so in love love with his own words, he just repeats, >repeats and then repeats. Some things need to be repeated because you have a lower than average ability in deductive reasoning and markedly low intelligence. The longer this thread goes on the clearer it becomes. >>>>The sycophantic knuckle-draggers who bow down to him for their free Usenet >>>>posting accounts can't help but respond and wade into flame wars >>>>because of Burnore's indiscretion with his then step-daughter. >>> >>>Would I be one of those or are you just frothing in general about the >>>quantity of people on usenet, regardless of nsp, that think you a lube job? >> >>I think you can only read a post in two ways. The person is either >>lifeless, dull and without enthusiasm. > >Of course you can only see two ways, Dimmy. You have the imagination >of a sea slug. 'I think you can only read a post in two ways.' 'Of course you can only see two ways, Dimmy' There you have it. There couldn't be a more blatant Hermanism. You were saying something about imagination, magpie mind? >>If they don't fall into that category then they're a 'frothing loon'. >>Your deductive reasoning shows far more about your cognitive abilities >>than you realise. >> > >That you are an award winning frothing loon will be ignored for a >moment. > >Contrary to what your ego tries to tell you: > >You are a delusional half-wit that thinks spewing mindless drivelling >fantasies is flaming. That you then use pathetic lames like "I hit a >nerve", repeat yourself ad infinitum, snip and run and then display >the unlimited ignorance that only a truly moronic individual could >display is why you are seen as a kook. > >Clear enough, Dimmy. In this post I've shone a bright light on your delusions. Your first paranoid delusion is that you're convinced I'm following you/people around Usenet. The second screamingly funny delusion is that you've mentioned multiple times that I brought Burnore into this thread, when you are clearly at odds with fact. I chuckled when you mentioned 'truly moronic' and 'kook'. I've not seen so many own goals in a single post for quite some time. >>>>These knuckle-draggers have been easy pickings for quite some time and I've >>>>hammered plenty of them into the ground like tent pegs. >>> >>>And the delusions of adequacy return. >> >>"From: a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com >>Subject: My wife complains about my small cock ALL THE TIME!" >> >>I told you to stop sending me email. >> >>[Cue: "Waaaaaaahhhhhh!!! I'm not sending you email. Waaaaaaahhhhhh!!!] > >Like no other kook has ever tried that. "Ah, Dimmy, so in love love with his own words, he just repeats, repeats and then repeats." <guffaw> >Cue standard Dimmy Delusion: >"I hit a nerve" Ahh, the old delusion line again. "Ah, Dimmy, so in love love with his own words, he just repeats, repeats and then repeats." Did you have to practice to score own goals like this or did it come naturally? >>>You do remember Bill Cleere and I discussing his spending quality time >>>with his grand son and you jumping in and whining about Burnore? >> >>No, I'm sure it left a big impression on you and you're going to tell >>me all about it. You dull twat. > >That was pretty ugly for you, I can see why you blanked it. I really don't remember it. Perhaps you could give me a little refresher given that you are so proud of your exploits? >>[...] "Yer a kook, yada, yada, yada." >> >>Colour me unimpressed. > >More like unimpressive: >:>A bunch of neanderthals who've yet to walk upright >: >:So I can add Paleoanthropology to the list of which you are wholly >:ignorant. If you are going to lame people, Dimmy, at least try to have >:a basic understanding of the words you are using. >: >: >:>and who are much more at >:>home in the trees scoffing bananas tell me I'm a kook because I enjoy >:>baiting the Burnore clan. >: >:<Mr. helpful mode> >immy, the Neanderthals were not tree living, they were omnivorous and >:they walked upright much as homo sapiens. >: >immy, would you like to try that with an earlier member of the genus >:homo? It then would have possibly worked. But you would have been >:better off with a monkey or chimp reference. Displaying your >:ignorance, Dimmy, does seem to cause your lames to lose any possible >:impact. >:</Mr. Helpful mode> > >Now that was funny stuff, I get to educate you on basic flaming and >basic antropology, you get the whole hoist on the petard effect and I >get to laugh at you for snipping and running. You won a small point. I'm impressed. Lets see how you handle this post. Remember to answer everything and no snipping and running. Shall I write the spank claim now? -- Timmay! Kook of the Month May 1999 Golden Killfile Sept 1999 Looney Maroon Dec 1998 Looney Maroon Feb 1999 Palmjob Paddle Nov 1999 Palmjob Paddle Oct 2000 George Pickett Sept 2000 George Pickett Oct 2000 Busted Urinal Award George Armstrong Custer "Kicked @$$" Award Tar & Feathers Award Kook Kard Deck, Three of Spades
Re: Does The Spankard Want a Second Bite At The Cherry? On Mon, 05 May 2008 18:14:26 +0100, in the land of alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: >>Timmay! What Dimmy? Does your utter failure bring you joy and happiness? BTW: Is this how you prove you have a life outside of usenet? -- A Number 1, Grade A, Prime USDA 'Ratz Accept No Substitute
Re: Does The Spankard Want a Second Bite At The Cherry? On Mon, 05 May 2008 18:14:26 +0100, Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> wrote: >Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: > >>Timmay! >><timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: >> >>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: >>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: >>>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: >>>>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: >>>[...] >>>>>>>What I like most of all about your statement is that you indicate that >>>>>>>any paging-style flames are crap whilst leaving your own paging-style >>>>>>>lame attributed to yourself. You don't get much dumber than that. >>>>>> >>>>>><undoubtedly boring drivel> >>>>> >>>>>I can see why >>>> >>>>Then why write? >>> >>>To humiliate you. >> >>Nothing like a Dimmy Thorne delusion of victory. > >Here's a replay for you. Lets see if you have the cajones to pick it >up this time. Althogh it was hilarious seeing you get spanked by Aratzio the first time, you are far too boring for me to want to read it all again plus your added whining. Jade > >Xref: news alt.flame:1128253 alt.usenet.kooks:1720811 >alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk:1088207 alt.fucknozzles:88183 >Path: news.alt.net >From: Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> >Newsgroups: >alt.flame,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk,alt.fucknozzles >Subject: Re: Timmay is literally Burnore's bitch. >Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 00:33:21 +0100 >Organization: Altopia Corp. - Usenet Access - www.altopia.com >Lines: 517 >Message-ID: <v9l5g3hb5daq885rnil9hpe9ej2cq22qtm@4ax.com> >References: <v9mlf3p778p3b7ee3r2d63fg01t8g4ov16@4ax.com> ><hc2mf3dvshvtsi4klan7qo63m9vajeq0nu@4ax.com> ><atlqf3phjin83kq2am6lcrnsmdq0b1fpl5@4ax.com> ><28nqf39dcbv21utg1mq1t90toe7jphkldi@4ax.com> ><bm2rf3dik2gp0t5j0vpfr1kgeau1t5k3dk@4ax.com> ><gohrf35ijgagssd6tl7s3irvnigt0lbtpv@4ax.com> ><hijvf3lj8u7odba1j30j4egm3fs129if4p@4ax.com> ><vpkvf3trkmb53dv8v7o3aucdpokavdnt1i@4ax.com> ><ljs2g31j07cnil6j6r3r80o2pv35bqv3ng@4ax.com> ><8dt2g3dnip6nsuf0ar0ng6ah7t2un9pe2g@4ax.com> >Mime-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118 > >Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: >>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: >>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: >>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: >>>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: >>>>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: >>>>>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: >>>>>>>[...] >>>>>>>>>Still only one stupid kook in sight. This has to be a first. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Wow, my credibility just took a hit. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>You never had any in the first place. >>>>>> >>>>>>Not like you could think of a line with out me feeding you with sarcasm. >>>>> >>>>>If you wanna wear a big sign that screams 'kick me', its best not to >>>>>whine about being kicked, unless you enjoy whining? <--------------------------- Short yellow bus riders read here >>>> >>>>Where's the whining, moron? Specifically point out the term or phrase >>>>you believe to be a whine. Just want to be able to pinpoint where in >>>>your education the teachers went wrong. My current theory is they >>>>actually felt you were educable. >>> >>>There has been a mysterious pattern to my posts for the past decade. >> >>Stupidity, lameness and complete lack of humor. > >You asked for directions to your whining, you whining witless wonder. >You were given directions for your whining. Now you're whining about >being given directions to your whining. Can't you do anything but >whine? Its tediously fucking boring. Do you realise how dull it is to >plod through your posts, kicking your lazy, unimaginative arse all >over alt.flame? Its so one-sided it isn't funny. > >>>Someone makes a comment, I follow it with another comment. Generally >>>the two comments have a theme and can be thought of as part of the >>>same 'conversation'. I think I've given you too much of a clue. Do you >>>require more help pinpointing it? If so, please board the short yellow >>>bus and wipe the drool from your chin when you board. >> >>Translation: Puke up any ole delusional gibberish and call it a (f)lame. > >All aboard the short yellow bus. Next stop, basic english >comprehension for unimaginitive cretins, where you'll be getting off. > >>>>>>You are pathetic. It is like when everyone gets bored with these >>>>>>monotonic lames you claim to be flames and walks away shaking their >>>>>>head, you then prance and preen claiming your victory once more. >>>>> >>>>>It is hardly difficult to outwit someone posting from AUK. >>>> >>>>I am, wow, this sure looks like aav3f. But this is your fantasy, do continue. >>> >>>It might be crossposted there, but you subscribe to and read AUK. >> >>Really? How can you be sure? Oh, that's right, you follow people >>around usenet. > >Sharon said the same thing and she got spanked over it. Every time she >plucks up the courage to post to alt.flame, she finds me there to punt >her back into oblivion. Being the generous person I am I'm going to >allow you to drop it and never mention it again. This is a one time >offer. So what's it to be? Do I follow people around Usenet or are you >a paranoid pillock who wants to spend some Usenet time being my bitch? > >>>You'd be reading this from AUK if I cut aav3f. Of course you could >>>still deny that you read AUK, but we both know that would be futile. >> >>But you didn't did you. Funny you make a lot of delusional claims but >>you never can quite back them up. > >I've got no need to back anything up because you've not stated >anything that needed refuting. Now, if you were to state that you >didn't read AUK, which you've been extremely hesitant to say, then I >might have to wade in and prove you to be a liar. Roll the dice and >make your choice. > >>>>>They usually display markedly lower than average deductive reasoning, >>>> >>>>I can see where you could get that impression. >>> >>>That's not a very nice thing to say about your fellow AUK'ers. Do they >>>know you hold them in such a low esteem? > >Hmmmm. No response, obviously correct. > ><guffaw> > >>>>The problem is that you write it, people point and laugh at you, you >>>>then post more delusional screed. Not like it requires AC Doyle to >>>>deduce you are a half-wit. >>> >>>The people doing the pointing and laughing are the very same people >>>that give you an impression of having a lower than average ability in >>>deductive reasoning. >> >>Ah, the context snip with the follow-up based upon the changed >>context. How cute, useless bute cute. I am sure self styled flamers >>enjoy being characterized as cute. >> >>Which explains why deductive reasoning is not required for your posts, >>half-wit. > >There was no context snip, you utterly confused spastic. > >Here I make a remark about AUK'ers: > >>"They usually display markedly lower than average deductive reasoning," > >You snip my sentence and reply with: > >>"I can see where you could get that impression." > >There is nothing unambiguous about your reply. Its not cut. Its not >taken out of context. It cannot be interpreted any other way. If you >meant to say something different, you did a fucking poor job of it. If >you can't express yourself properly then unplug your keyboard and get >the fuck out of here. You clearly don't belong. > >>>Am I supposed to be upset that a bunch of people >>>we both agree to have markedly low intelligence called me a few names >>>and don't think highly of me? I'll just grab that box of tissues... >> >>Well, you have been quite *regular* in your spewing to usenet, ever >>since you were named "Burnore's Bitch". So yeah, evidence does support >>that conclusion. > >There is no evidence of anything except your craziness, kook. You're >reaching the bottom of the barrel and have even taken to claiming I'm >following people around Usenet. Don't you realise how completely >laughable your statement is? You're completely kooking out. > >>>>>subnormally low intelligence, virtually no creativity and they can't >>>>>quite grasp the point that they are inferior creatures to the rest of >>>>>the population. Victory is assured before I post. >>>> >>>>Nothing like demonstrating that I am right. >>>>Did you do that whole "staying alive" bit? >>> >>>Forgive me for not knowing what the fuck you're babbling about when >>>you make an obscure reference to some 70s film. >> >>Not like it is hard to get one by you, eh, Dimmy. >> >>Hint: You claimed *victory", right on schedule. Which given your >>preening egoist nature would require a *victory dance*. Travolta would >>seem right up your alley. > >Victory *is* assured. The human flith emanating from AUK isn't capable >of mounting a challenge for longer than a couple of reply cycles. > >>>>>>It is amazing the convolutions of logic that the hard of thinking must >>>>>>go through to create a world where they are anything but what reality >>>>>>says they are. Yes, Dimmy, that would be you. Delusions of adequacy >>>>>>dance in that teacup sized brain. >>>>> >>>>>"From: a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com >>>>>Subject: My wife complains about my small cock ALL THE TIME!" >>>>> >>>>>Please don't send me any further email. Thank you. >>>> >>>>"I know, I'll make up something and everyone will believe Ratz is >>>>emailing me" >>>> >>>>No kook ever tried that one before. >>> >>>I can see why you'd think that. >> >>Yes, you are that stupid. > >PeeWee Herman wants his repertoire back. > >>> You do display markedly lower than >>>average deductive reasoning and subnormally low intelligence. >> >>*snicker* > >I thought it was funny too. Its pretty sad you're laughing at it while >proving it in almost every sentence. > >>>My comment has precipated a rather irrational comment from you to such a >>>jovial gag. I guess I touched a nerve. >> >>If you are delusional, then you could make that assumption. But again, >>you seem to lost something in your translation of English to Dimmy. > >I didn't actually the aim the gag that high, but it seems to have >missed you by some distance. I'm coming to the conclusion that if I >had to aim to hit you, it wouldn't be going skywards. > >>>>I obviously was being far too kind when I used pathetic. >> >>No response, obviously correct. > ><guffaw> > >>>>>>>>Dayam, what shall I do, deary me, called a kook, by a multi-award winner. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Hopefully you'll get the message that constantly making yourself a >>>>>>>laughing stock with these tepid displays of your mediocre (f)laming >>>>>>>talent and endeavour to dive in front of a bus, allowing spam to >>>>>>>improve the signal to noise ratio in AF. >>>>>> >>>>>>What flaming, Dimmy? >>>>> >>>>>Exactly. >>>> >>>>Dimmy, I had to feed you the line, again. Just so I could point out you >>>>could not tell a flame if it was a ten pound wart attached to your nose. >>> >>>Could you whine a little louder about setting yourself up for an easy >>>shot? There's someone in the next solar system who hasn't heard you. >> >>So how is the wart these days? Do you notice it any more? > >Your mom is fine. She send her regards and says she'll change your >diaper when she gets back from the two week holiday. Hopefully you >won't have attracted that many flies and suffocated on them by then. > >>>>>>Sarcasm and pointing out your lack of skills in any arena could hardly >>>>>>be called flaming. Toss in that a moron like you imagines anyone is >>>>>>subbing alt.lame just makes it that much more pathetic. >>>>> >>>>>You got something to say about alt.flame? You don't have the balls. >>>> >>>>So you can't read either or just begging for help? >>> >>>I knew you'd weasel out of making any more comments about 'alt.lame'. >> >>"Toss in that a moron like you imagines anyone is subbing alt.lame >>just makes it that much more pathetic. " > >Its the SAME fucking comment, you crainially-challenged clown. I said >any MORE comments. You're so utterly lacking in any creative ability >that you can't write anything new. Click your heels together three >times, Dorothy. You're off to Oz to ask the wizard for an imagination. > >>>You just don't have the spine. You're so easy to manipulate. Do you >>>see how easy it is to control a weak-minded fool like you? >> >>That I called alt.flame, alt.lame and declared it dead was not enough? >> >>No one came to your rescue, even with that pathetic mewl for help. >> >>Now beg for more help, Dimmy. > >Since you're in the mood to continue to do my bidding, how about you >saddle on over to the fridge and get me a beer? > >>>>>>I suppose winning all your kook awards was somewhat disturbing, for >>>>>>such a weak minded sot as yourself, but I am sure the train went all >>>>>>the way off the tracks when you realized how many people consider you >>>>>>an obsessive stalking froot loop and made you Gary's personal punch bag. >>>>> >>>>>I think its pretty funny. >>>> >>>>So do *we*. You froth and claim victory, you win awards, *we* laugh. >>> >>>The people handing out the 'awards' are the very same people that give >>>you an impression of having a lower than average ability in deductive >>>reasoning. Am I supposed to be upset that a bunch of people we both >>>agree to have markedly low intelligence called me a kook and don't >>>think highly of me? I'll just grab a second box of tissues... >> >>Sad. > >Lets see if you can make it through the next post without mentioning >'frothing', 'laming' or 'delusional', you uncreative little twerp. > >>>>>You have to consider the situation. >>>> >>>>You obsess constantly about Gary, that would be the situation. It has >>>>now been officially recognized. Ergo the much higher visibility from you. >>> >>>I do no such thing you silly little man. I read a couple of newsgroups >>>and if the kiddie-diddling imbecile happens to pop up in those groups, >>>I bait the idiot and watch half a dozen loons from his flea circus try >>>to defend him. I know its not very sporting or difficult, but hey, I >>>find it fun. >> >>See, you obsess about Burnore. You can't even make it through a post >>with out some reference to Gary. > >We went for ten posts without mentioning Burnore in this thread, so >your statement is incorrect. If you'd said "I can't make it through >five posts without mentioning Burnore." that would be factually >correct. You do realise you're the one who has constantly brought up >his name in this thread, don't you? > >>>>>A bunch of neanderthals who've yet to walk upright >>>> >>>>So I can add Paleoanthropology to the list of which you are wholly >>>>ignorant. If you are going to lame people, Dimmy, at least try to have >>>>a basic understanding of the words you are using. >>> >>>I seem to have touched a nerve there. I suppose paleoanthropology is >>>useful to you so you can identify your family and friends. >> >>"I touched a nerve there" >>You probably actually believe that you did. That your lame was based >>upon complete ignorance, well that is quite okay with you. Ignorance >>is your watchword. > >It was late, I was tired, scratch one point up to you. I'm quite >confident the multitude of points I'm beating you on are more than >enough to see you off. > >>>[...] >> >>*SNORT* >>And so begins the run and hide of Dimmy the coward. Up til now all was >>good, then you got your tit in the wringer with a load of ignorant >>twaddle and suddenly Dimmy needs to trim and make the bad words go >>away. I can always count on that from you, Dimmy. What next spelling >>lames? > >I'll leave those to you. > >"Have you picked up a dictionary, ever?" ><evnne1ls4voub9bq0b0o7ei2e14ddo41cf@4ax.com> > >"Do try to keep up Mr. Illiteracy." ><evnne1ls4voub9bq0b0o7ei2e14ddo41cf@4ax.com> > >"Literacy is not something you can put on a resume." ><evnne1ls4voub9bq0b0o7ei2e14ddo41cf@4ax.com> > >Don't let the door hit you on the way out. > >>>>> Burnore can't wander into any newsgroup >>>>>without someone slinging the 'child molester' tag at him. >>>> >>>>Usually due to some obsessive fuckwit following him around. I'll bet >>>>you have that whole google alerts thing set up just for Gary. >>> >>><rolls eyes> >>> >>>Having googled my profile you know I read just two newsgroups. >> >>Well, Mr. Ego is lose today. > >"Literacy is not something you can put on a resume." ><evnne1ls4voub9bq0b0o7ei2e14ddo41cf@4ax.com> > ><guffaw> > >>No, Dimmy, I didn't but this, again, is your delusion, do continue: > >You should. You'll find the delusion is all yours. You'll find that it >was you who brought Burnore into the flurry of posts between us. > >Lets see what the dictionary says about delusion: > >'Psychiatry. a fixed false belief that is resistant to reason or >confrontation with actual fact: a paranoid delusion.' > >If we couple this with the rampant paranoia that thinks I'm following >people around Usenet (you can pony up some proof any time now) then >we're beginning to see some downright kooky behaviour from you. > >>>How you can deduce from that obsessive behaviour I don't know. >> >>The fact you inject Burnore in everything. > >Fact: You brought Burnore into this thread, not me. > >>>I think you're firmly in the bracket of having a lower than average >>>ability in deductive reasoning and markedly low intelligence. Some >>>might even say your deduction is downright kooky. >> >>Ah, Dimmy, so in love love with his own words, he just repeats, >>repeats and then repeats. > >Some things need to be repeated because you have a lower than average >ability in deductive reasoning and markedly low intelligence. The >longer this thread goes on the clearer it becomes. > >>>>>The sycophantic knuckle-draggers who bow down to him for their free Usenet >>>>>posting accounts can't help but respond and wade into flame wars >>>>>because of Burnore's indiscretion with his then step-daughter. >>>> >>>>Would I be one of those or are you just frothing in general about the >>>>quantity of people on usenet, regardless of nsp, that think you a lube job? >>> >>>I think you can only read a post in two ways. The person is either >>>lifeless, dull and without enthusiasm. >> >>Of course you can only see two ways, Dimmy. You have the imagination >>of a sea slug. > >'I think you can only read a post in two ways.' > >'Of course you can only see two ways, Dimmy' > >There you have it. There couldn't be a more blatant Hermanism. You >were saying something about imagination, magpie mind? > >>>If they don't fall into that category then they're a 'frothing loon'. >>>Your deductive reasoning shows far more about your cognitive abilities >>>than you realise. >>> >> >>That you are an award winning frothing loon will be ignored for a >>moment. >> >>Contrary to what your ego tries to tell you: >> >>You are a delusional half-wit that thinks spewing mindless drivelling >>fantasies is flaming. That you then use pathetic lames like "I hit a >>nerve", repeat yourself ad infinitum, snip and run and then display >>the unlimited ignorance that only a truly moronic individual could >>display is why you are seen as a kook. >> >>Clear enough, Dimmy. > >In this post I've shone a bright light on your delusions. Your first >paranoid delusion is that you're convinced I'm following you/people >around Usenet. The second screamingly funny delusion is that you've >mentioned multiple times that I brought Burnore into this thread, when >you are clearly at odds with fact. I chuckled when you mentioned >'truly moronic' and 'kook'. I've not seen so many own goals in a >single post for quite some time. > >>>>>These knuckle-draggers have been easy pickings for quite some time and I've >>>>>hammered plenty of them into the ground like tent pegs. >>>> >>>>And the delusions of adequacy return. >>> >>>"From: a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com >>>Subject: My wife complains about my small cock ALL THE TIME!" >>> >>>I told you to stop sending me email. >>> >>>[Cue: "Waaaaaaahhhhhh!!! I'm not sending you email. Waaaaaaahhhhhh!!!] >> >>Like no other kook has ever tried that. > >"Ah, Dimmy, so in love love with his own words, he just repeats, >repeats and then repeats." > ><guffaw> > >>Cue standard Dimmy Delusion: >>"I hit a nerve" > >Ahh, the old delusion line again. > >"Ah, Dimmy, so in love love with his own words, he just repeats, >repeats and then repeats." > >Did you have to practice to score own goals like this or did it come >naturally? > >>>>You do remember Bill Cleere and I discussing his spending quality time >>>>with his grand son and you jumping in and whining about Burnore? >>> >>>No, I'm sure it left a big impression on you and you're going to tell >>>me all about it. You dull twat. >> >>That was pretty ugly for you, I can see why you blanked it. > >I really don't remember it. Perhaps you could give me a little >refresher given that you are so proud of your exploits? > >>>[...] "Yer a kook, yada, yada, yada." >>> >>>Colour me unimpressed. >> >>More like unimpressive: >>:>A bunch of neanderthals who've yet to walk upright >>: >>:So I can add Paleoanthropology to the list of which you are wholly >>:ignorant. If you are going to lame people, Dimmy, at least try to have >>:a basic understanding of the words you are using. >>: >>: >>:>and who are much more at >>:>home in the trees scoffing bananas tell me I'm a kook because I enjoy >>:>baiting the Burnore clan. >>: >>:<Mr. helpful mode> >>immy, the Neanderthals were not tree living, they were omnivorous and >>:they walked upright much as homo sapiens. >>: >>immy, would you like to try that with an earlier member of the genus >>:homo? It then would have possibly worked. But you would have been >>:better off with a monkey or chimp reference. Displaying your >>:ignorance, Dimmy, does seem to cause your lames to lose any possible >>:impact. >>:</Mr. Helpful mode> >> >>Now that was funny stuff, I get to educate you on basic flaming and >>basic antropology, you get the whole hoist on the petard effect and I >>get to laugh at you for snipping and running. > >You won a small point. I'm impressed. Lets see how you handle this >post. Remember to answer everything and no snipping and running. > >Shall I write the spank claim now?
Re: Does The Spankard Want a Second Bite At The Cherry? Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: >Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: > >>>Timmay! > >What Dimmy? Does your utter failure bring you joy and happiness? > >BTW: Is this how you prove you have a life outside of usenet? This proves I spanked you. If you want to pick it up the thread and address the mistakes you've made then go ahead. If you want to avoid it again then go ahead. It doesn't make any difference either way because you'll still be spanked. <v9l5g3hb5daq885rnil9hpe9ej2cq22qtm@4ax.com> -- Timmay! "You've followed me thread to thread, ng to ng (including those you claim you don't read) for the last year, spanktoy." Paranoid Burton imagines stalkers in <259v3uc2um3vbs74s9glrn2kgh22b4mfkj@4ax.com>
Re: Does The Spankard Want a Second Bite At The Cherry? On Mon, 05 May 2008 14:55:52 -0400, in the land of alt.config, Daedalus <jade@newtko0ouks.biz> got double secret probation for writing: >Althogh it was hilarious seeing you get spanked by Aratzio the first >time, you are far too boring for me to want to read it all again plus >your added whining. > >Jade He claims it is some sort of epic Dimmy spank, could you be a pal, drink like 20 cups of coffee and snort an 8-ball of speed then and see if you can make it to the end? -- A Number 1, Grade A, Prime USDA 'Ratz Accept No Substitute
Re: Does The Spankard Want a Second Bite At The Cherry? On Mon, 05 May 2008 20:15:41 +0100, in the land of alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: >Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: >>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: >> >>>>Timmay! >> >>What Dimmy? Does your utter failure bring you joy and happiness? >> >>BTW: Is this how you prove you have a life outside of usenet? > >This proves I spanked you. You must feel like that tree in the forest, no one there to hear you fall down. -- A Number 1, Grade A, Prime USDA 'Ratz Accept No Substitute
Re: Does The Spankard Want a Second Bite At The Cherry? Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: >Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: >>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: >>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: >>> >>>>>Timmay! >>> >>>What Dimmy? Does your utter failure bring you joy and happiness? >>> >>>BTW: Is this how you prove you have a life outside of usenet? >> >>This proves I spanked you. > >You must feel like that tree in the forest, no one there to hear you >fall down. Plenty of people are reading this newsgroup. I don't really need my buddies from another newsgroup to jump in for moral support. I'm quite happy to slap you around for my own personal enjoyment. None of this changes the fact that you're a spankard. -- Timmay! "You've followed me thread to thread, ng to ng (including those you claim you don't read) for the last year, spanktoy." Paranoid Burton imagines stalkers in <259v3uc2um3vbs74s9glrn2kgh22b4mfkj@4ax.com>
Re: Does The Spankard Want a Second Bite At The Cherry? On Mon, 05 May 2008 20:50:28 +0100, in the land of alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: >Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: >>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: >>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: >>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: >>>> >>>>>>Timmay! >>>> >>>>What Dimmy? Does your utter failure bring you joy and happiness? >>>> >>>>BTW: Is this how you prove you have a life outside of usenet? >>> >>>This proves I spanked you. >> >>You must feel like that tree in the forest, no one there to hear you >>fall down. > >Plenty of people are reading this newsgroup. And in all this time, one sock puppet came forward to support you and that was done out of pity. You pretty much define the word *failure*. > I don't really need my >buddies from another newsgroup to jump in for moral support. Poor Dimmy, alone and friendless in a cold and uncompromising world. He must therefore stand up for himself, no matter that he is complete and utter failure. Dimmy will be there for Dimmy, no matter how many times Dimmy fucks up >I'm quite happy to slap you around for my own personal enjoyment. All wrapped in the glowing warmth of his own delusions, Dimmy marches forth against the world once more. > >None of this changes the fact that you're a spankard. Poor Dimmy, maybe Marcia will take pity upon you, *again*, sock up and help you feel like less of a complete and utter failure. Not that it makes you any less of a complete and utter failure. -- A Number 1, Grade A, Prime USDA 'Ratz Accept No Substitute
Re: Does The Spankard Want a Second Bite At The Cherry? Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: >Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: >>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: >>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: >>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: >>>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: >>>>> >>>>>>>Timmay! >>>>> >>>>>What Dimmy? Does your utter failure bring you joy and happiness? >>>>> >>>>>BTW: Is this how you prove you have a life outside of usenet? >>>> >>>>This proves I spanked you. >>> >>>You must feel like that tree in the forest, no one there to hear you >>>fall down. >> >>Plenty of people are reading this newsgroup. > >And in all this time, one sock puppet came forward to support you and >that was done out of pity. You pretty much define the word *failure*. You pretty much define the word *spankard* my pink-bottomed fiend. If all you've got to cling to after the kickings I given you in alt.flame is some moron pretending to be another moron, then you haven't got a great deal of anything, have you? >>I don't really need my buddies from another newsgroup to jump in for >>moral support. > >Poor Dimmy, alone and friendless in a cold and uncompromising world. >He must therefore stand up for himself, no matter that he is complete >and utter failure. "I really need my buddies from another newsgroup to jump in for moral support." <laugh> >Dimmy will be there for Dimmy, no matter how many times Dimmy fucks up > >>I'm quite happy to slap you around for my own personal enjoyment. > >All wrapped in the glowing warmth of his own delusions, Dimmy marches >forth against the world once more. You use that word delusion a lot as a defensive shield. It might work except for the glaring fact that you've been getting a pasting today. Hark... "I think I understand your logic. When people say something bigoted you call them on it, but when you're being a bigot you're just 'having a laugh' and its perfectly acceptable behaviour, right?" Not a single word in reply. Hit the nail on the head, didn't I, bigot? >>None of this changes the fact that you're a spankard. > >Poor Dimmy, maybe Marcia will take pity upon you, *again*, sock up and >help you feel like less of a complete and utter failure. Not that it >makes you any less of a complete and utter failure. I get the distinct impression that you're going to snip like crazy and try and mention Marcia as much as possible. I understand why you're going to do it. You're weak, you can't compete in alt.flame and you've already been slapped around the head so much you'll do pretty much anything to extricate yourself from it. -- Timmay! "You've followed me thread to thread, ng to ng (including those you claim you don't read) for the last year, spanktoy." Paranoid Burton imagines stalkers in <259v3uc2um3vbs74s9glrn2kgh22b4mfkj@4ax.com>
Re: Does The Spankard Want a Second Bite At The Cherry? On Mon, 05 May 2008 18:14:26 +0100, Timmay! wrote: > Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: > >>Timmay! >><timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: >> >>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: >>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: >>>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: >>>>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: >>>[...] >>>>>>>What I like most of all about your statement is that you indicate that >>>>>>>any paging-style flames are crap whilst leaving your own paging-style >>>>>>>lame attributed to yourself. You don't get much dumber than that. >>>>>> >>>>>><undoubtedly boring drivel> >>>>> >>>>>I can see why >>>> >>>>Then why write? >>> >>>To humiliate you. >> >>Nothing like a Dimmy Thorne delusion of victory. > > Here's a replay for you. Lets see if you have the cajones to pick it > up this time. For fuck's sake talk about being patently obsessed! [snip] -- #1 Offishul Ruiner of Usenet, March 2007 #1 Usenet Asshole, March 2007 #10 Most hated Usenetizen of all time Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, June 2004 COOSN-266-06-25794
Re: Does The Spankard Want a Second Bite At The Cherry? On Mon, 05 May 2008 20:15:41 +0100, Timmay! wrote: > Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: >>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: >> >>>>Timmay! >> >>What Dimmy? Does your utter failure bring you joy and happiness? >> >>BTW: Is this how you prove you have a life outside of usenet? > > This proves I spanked you Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahah -- #1 Offishul Ruiner of Usenet, March 2007 #1 Usenet Asshole, March 2007 #10 Most hated Usenetizen of all time Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, June 2004 COOSN-266-06-25794
Dimmy Tries To Spit Out The Hook was: Does The Spankard Want a Second Bite At The Cherry? On Mon, 05 May 2008 21:56:44 +0100, in the land of alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: >Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: >>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: >>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: >>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: >>>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: >>>>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: >>>>>> >>>>>>>>Timmay! >>>>>> >>>>>>What Dimmy? Does your utter failure bring you joy and happiness? >>>>>> >>>>>>BTW: Is this how you prove you have a life outside of usenet? >>>>> >>>>>This proves I spanked you. >>>> >>>>You must feel like that tree in the forest, no one there to hear you >>>>fall down. >>> >>>Plenty of people are reading this newsgroup. >> >>And in all this time, one sock puppet came forward to support you and >>that was done out of pity. You pretty much define the word *failure*. > <Dimmy trying to spit out a 7 month old hook> >You pretty much define the word *spankard* my pink-bottomed fiend. If >all you've got to cling to after the kickings I given you in alt.flame >is some moron pretending to be another moron, then you haven't got a >great deal of anything, have you? Santa'a Little Helper is now "some moron" because Dimmy was trolled. Funny, she was "independent" and your proof of spank just a couple posts ago. Nice back pedal, Dimmy. That hook all rusted and encrusted with drool is a good look for you. <undoubtedly more backpedal and claims of I WIN!!!!> -- A Number 1, Grade A, Prime USDA 'Ratz Accept No Substitute
Re: Dimmy Tries To Spit Out The Hook was: Does The Spankard Want aSecond Bite At The Cherry? On Mon, 05 May 2008 19:33:32 -0700 Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: > On Mon, 05 May 2008 21:56:44 +0100, in the land of > alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Timmay! > <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: > > >Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: > >>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: > >>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: > >>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: > >>>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>>Timmay! > >>>>>> > >>>>>>What Dimmy? Does your utter failure bring you joy and happiness? > >>>>>> > >>>>>>BTW: Is this how you prove you have a life outside of usenet? > >>>>> > >>>>>This proves I spanked you. > >>>> > >>>>You must feel like that tree in the forest, no one there to hear you > >>>>fall down. > >>> > >>>Plenty of people are reading this newsgroup. > >> > >>And in all this time, one sock puppet came forward to support you and > >>that was done out of pity. You pretty much define the word *failure*. > > > > <Dimmy trying to spit out a 7 month old hook> > > >You pretty much define the word *spankard* my pink-bottomed fiend. If > >all you've got to cling to after the kickings I given you in alt.flame > >is some moron pretending to be another moron, then you haven't got a > >great deal of anything, have you? > > > Santa'a Little Helper is now "some moron" because Dimmy was trolled. > Funny, she was "independent" and your proof of spank just a couple > posts ago. > > Nice back pedal, Dimmy. That hook all rusted and encrusted with drool > is a good look for you. > > <undoubtedly more backpedal and claims of I WIN!!!!> > So this is who "Timmay" aka Tim Thorne is? Hmmm...he seems kinda angry. is it a general agnst or a schadenfreud gestalt thingy? -- http://thinkprogress.org/2008/05/05...fghanistan-war-vets-may-exceed-combat-deaths/
Re: Dimmy Tries To Spit Out The Hook was: Does The Spankard Want a Second Bite At The Cherry? On Tue, 6 May 2008 07:52:31 -0700, in the land of alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Wolf 253 <snuhwolf@netscape.net> got double secret probation for writing: >On Mon, 05 May 2008 19:33:32 -0700 >Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, 05 May 2008 21:56:44 +0100, in the land of >> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Timmay! >> <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: >> >> >Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: >> >>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: >> >>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: >> >>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: >> >>>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: >> >>>>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>Timmay! >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>>What Dimmy? Does your utter failure bring you joy and happiness? >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>>BTW: Is this how you prove you have a life outside of usenet? >> >>>>> >> >>>>>This proves I spanked you. >> >>>> >> >>>>You must feel like that tree in the forest, no one there to hear you >> >>>>fall down. >> >>> >> >>>Plenty of people are reading this newsgroup. >> >> >> >>And in all this time, one sock puppet came forward to support you and >> >>that was done out of pity. You pretty much define the word *failure*. >> > >> >> <Dimmy trying to spit out a 7 month old hook> >> >> >You pretty much define the word *spankard* my pink-bottomed fiend. If >> >all you've got to cling to after the kickings I given you in alt.flame >> >is some moron pretending to be another moron, then you haven't got a >> >great deal of anything, have you? >> >> >> Santa'a Little Helper is now "some moron" because Dimmy was trolled. >> Funny, she was "independent" and your proof of spank just a couple >> posts ago. >> >> Nice back pedal, Dimmy. That hook all rusted and encrusted with drool >> is a good look for you. >> >> <undoubtedly more backpedal and claims of I WIN!!!!> >> >So this is who "Timmay" aka Tim Thorne is? >Hmmm...he seems kinda angry. >is it a general agnst or a schadenfreud gestalt thingy? > More locked in a vicious cycle of self abuse kind of angry. -- A Number 1, Grade A, Prime USDA 'Ratz Accept No Substitute
Re: Does The Spankard Want a Second Bite At The Cherry? Timmay! wrote: > Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: >>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: >>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: >>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: >>>> >>>>>>Timmay! >>>> >>>>What Dimmy? Does your utter failure bring you joy and happiness? >>>> >>>>BTW: Is this how you prove you have a life outside of usenet? >>> >>>This proves I spanked you. >> >>You must feel like that tree in the forest, no one there to hear you >>fall down. > > Plenty of people are reading this newsgroup. I don't really need my > buddies from another newsgroup to jump in for moral support. I'm quite > happy to slap you around for my own personal enjoyment. > > None of this changes the fact that you're a spankard. Got ilk? -- ah
Re: Dimmy Tries To Spit Out The Hook was: Does The Spankard Want aSecond Bite At The Cherry? On Tue, 06 May 2008 08:41:07 -0700 Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: > On Tue, 6 May 2008 07:52:31 -0700, in the land of > alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Wolf 253 <snuhwolf@netscape.net> > got double secret probation for writing: > > >On Mon, 05 May 2008 19:33:32 -0700 > >Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: > > > >> On Mon, 05 May 2008 21:56:44 +0100, in the land of > >> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Timmay! > >> <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: > >> > >> >Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: > >> >>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: > >> >>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: > >> >>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: > >> >>>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: > >> >>>>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>Timmay! > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>>What Dimmy? Does your utter failure bring you joy and happiness? > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>>BTW: Is this how you prove you have a life outside of usenet? > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>>This proves I spanked you. > >> >>>> > >> >>>>You must feel like that tree in the forest, no one there to hear you > >> >>>>fall down. > >> >>> > >> >>>Plenty of people are reading this newsgroup. > >> >> > >> >>And in all this time, one sock puppet came forward to support you and > >> >>that was done out of pity. You pretty much define the word *failure*. > >> > > >> > >> <Dimmy trying to spit out a 7 month old hook> > >> > >> >You pretty much define the word *spankard* my pink-bottomed fiend. If > >> >all you've got to cling to after the kickings I given you in alt.flame > >> >is some moron pretending to be another moron, then you haven't got a > >> >great deal of anything, have you? > >> > >> > >> Santa'a Little Helper is now "some moron" because Dimmy was trolled. > >> Funny, she was "independent" and your proof of spank just a couple > >> posts ago. > >> > >> Nice back pedal, Dimmy. That hook all rusted and encrusted with drool > >> is a good look for you. > >> > >> <undoubtedly more backpedal and claims of I WIN!!!!> > >> > >So this is who "Timmay" aka Tim Thorne is? > >Hmmm...he seems kinda angry. > >is it a general agnst or a schadenfreud gestalt thingy? > > > > More locked in a vicious cycle of self abuse kind of angry. > I bet he's a "cutter". -- http://thinkprogress.org/2008/05/06...way-from-indiana-polls-for-lacking-photo-ids/
Re: Dimmy Tries To Spit Out The Hook was: Does The Spankard Want a Second Bite At The Cherry? On Wed, 7 May 2008 07:54:27 -0700, Wolf 253 <snuhwolf@netscape.net> wrote: >On Tue, 06 May 2008 08:41:07 -0700 >Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, 6 May 2008 07:52:31 -0700, in the land of >> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Wolf 253 <snuhwolf@netscape.net> >> got double secret probation for writing: >> >> >On Mon, 05 May 2008 19:33:32 -0700 >> >Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> On Mon, 05 May 2008 21:56:44 +0100, in the land of >> >> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Timmay! >> >> <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: >> >> >> >> >Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: >> >> >>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: >> >> >>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: >> >> >>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: >> >> >>>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: >> >> >>>>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>Timmay! >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>What Dimmy? Does your utter failure bring you joy and happiness? >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>BTW: Is this how you prove you have a life outside of usenet? >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>>This proves I spanked you. >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>>You must feel like that tree in the forest, no one there to hear you >> >> >>>>fall down. >> >> >>> >> >> >>>Plenty of people are reading this newsgroup. >> >> >> >> >> >>And in all this time, one sock puppet came forward to support you and >> >> >>that was done out of pity. You pretty much define the word *failure*. >> >> > >> >> >> >> <Dimmy trying to spit out a 7 month old hook> >> >> >> >> >You pretty much define the word *spankard* my pink-bottomed fiend. If >> >> >all you've got to cling to after the kickings I given you in alt.flame >> >> >is some moron pretending to be another moron, then you haven't got a >> >> >great deal of anything, have you? >> >> >> >> >> >> Santa'a Little Helper is now "some moron" because Dimmy was trolled. >> >> Funny, she was "independent" and your proof of spank just a couple >> >> posts ago. >> >> >> >> Nice back pedal, Dimmy. That hook all rusted and encrusted with drool >> >> is a good look for you. >> >> >> >> <undoubtedly more backpedal and claims of I WIN!!!!> >> >> >> >So this is who "Timmay" aka Tim Thorne is? >> >Hmmm...he seems kinda angry. >> >is it a general agnst or a schadenfreud gestalt thingy? >> > >> >> More locked in a vicious cycle of self abuse kind of angry. >> >I bet he's a "cutter". > Glue sniffer. Jade
Re: Dimmy Tries To Spit Out The Hook was: Does The Spankard Want a Second Bite At The Cherry? On Wed, 07 May 2008 15:26:10 -0400, in the land of alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Daedalus <jade@newtko0ouks.biz> got double secret probation for writing: >On Wed, 7 May 2008 07:54:27 -0700, Wolf 253 <snuhwolf@netscape.net> >wrote: > >>On Tue, 06 May 2008 08:41:07 -0700 >>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 6 May 2008 07:52:31 -0700, in the land of >>> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Wolf 253 <snuhwolf@netscape.net> >>> got double secret probation for writing: >>> >>> >On Mon, 05 May 2008 19:33:32 -0700 >>> >Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: >>> > >>> >> On Mon, 05 May 2008 21:56:44 +0100, in the land of >>> >> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Timmay! >>> >> <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: >>> >> >>> >> >Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: >>> >> >>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: >>> >> >>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: >>> >> >>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: >>> >> >>>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: >>> >> >>>>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing: >>> >> >>>>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>>Timmay! >>> >> >>>>>> >>> >> >>>>>>What Dimmy? Does your utter failure bring you joy and happiness? >>> >> >>>>>> >>> >> >>>>>>BTW: Is this how you prove you have a life outside of usenet? >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >>>>>This proves I spanked you. >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >>>>You must feel like that tree in the forest, no one there to hear you >>> >> >>>>fall down. >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>Plenty of people are reading this newsgroup. >>> >> >> >>> >> >>And in all this time, one sock puppet came forward to support you and >>> >> >>that was done out of pity. You pretty much define the word *failure*. >>> >> > >>> >> >>> >> <Dimmy trying to spit out a 7 month old hook> >>> >> >>> >> >You pretty much define the word *spankard* my pink-bottomed fiend. If >>> >> >all you've got to cling to after the kickings I given you in alt.flame >>> >> >is some moron pretending to be another moron, then you haven't got a >>> >> >great deal of anything, have you? >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Santa'a Little Helper is now "some moron" because Dimmy was trolled. >>> >> Funny, she was "independent" and your proof of spank just a couple >>> >> posts ago. >>> >> >>> >> Nice back pedal, Dimmy. That hook all rusted and encrusted with drool >>> >> is a good look for you. >>> >> >>> >> <undoubtedly more backpedal and claims of I WIN!!!!> >>> >> >>> >So this is who "Timmay" aka Tim Thorne is? >>> >Hmmm...he seems kinda angry. >>> >is it a general agnst or a schadenfreud gestalt thingy? >>> > >>> >>> More locked in a vicious cycle of self abuse kind of angry. >>> >>I bet he's a "cutter". >> > > >Glue sniffer. > Lint eater. -- A Number 1, Grade A, Prime USDA 'Ratz Accept No Substitute
