Re: 03/04/05 Puns

Discussion in 'Chatter' started by Tim Bruening, Dec 26, 2007.

  1. Tim Bruening

    Tim Bruening Guest

    230 days since January 24.
     
  2. Tim Bruening

    Tim Bruening Guest

    235 days since January 19.
     
  3. Tim Bruening

    Tim Bruening Guest

    25 days to October 5.
     
  4. Tim Bruening

    Tim Bruening Guest

    25 days since August 16.
     
  5. Tim Bruening

    Tim Bruening Guest

    250 days since January 4.
     
  6. Tim Bruening

    Tim Bruening Guest

    15 days to September 25.
     
  7. Tim Bruening

    Tim Bruening Guest

    300 days since November 15.
     
  8. Tim Bruening

    Tim Bruening Guest

    45 days since July 27.
     
  9. Tim Bruening

    Tim Bruening Guest

    50 days to October 30.
     
  10. Tim Bruening

    Tim Bruening Guest

    75 days to November 24.
     
  11. Tim Bruening

    Tim Bruening Guest

    85 days since June 17.
     
  12. Tim Bruening

    Tim Bruening Guest

    95 days since 06/07/08.
     
  13. Tim Bruening

    Tim Bruening Guest

    90 days since June 12.
     
  14. Tim Bruening

    Tim Bruening Guest

    Anne Kristin wrote:

    > On 9 Sep, 09:09, Tim Bruening <tsbru...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote:
    > > 1009 years since 9/9/999.

    >
    > Well done to manage to send this mail 09.09.2009 09:09AM :) I wounder
    > how you manage to calculate all these dates. Its amazing anyway


    According to my records, I sent my message at 12:09 AM on September 9.
    Where did you get 9:09?
     
  15. Bob Badour

    Bob Badour Guest

    Tim Bruening wrote:

    > Anne Kristin wrote:
    >
    >>On 9 Sep, 09:09, Tim Bruening <tsbru...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote:
    >>
    >>>1009 years since 9/9/999.

    >>
    >>Well done to manage to send this mail 09.09.2009 09:09AM :) I wounder
    >>how you manage to calculate all these dates. Its amazing anyway

    >
    > According to my records, I sent my message at 12:09 AM on September 9.
    > Where did you get 9:09?


    It shows on my computer as 4:09am because I am 4 timezones ahead of you.
    I assume Anne is 5 more timezones ahead of me and 9 timezones ahead of you.
     
  16. Tim Bruening

    Tim Bruening Guest

    David Simpson wrote:

    > On 10 Feb 2004 22:14:11 -0600, "Milton J. Smuthworthy, I"
    > <tonworthyCLOTHES@SexMagnet.com> typed furiously:
    >
    > >
    > >So then, David Simpson turns to the guy and says:
    > >>
    > >>>>>New South Wales is good. Milt could suspend himself there.
    > >>>Can I fly there on that virgin airline?
    > >>No, it's already been raped. Quant, as in Mary, did the dirty.
    > >>>>Noooooo! We'll let you keep him in the manner to which he would like
    > >>>>to become accustomed.
    > >>>I could get accustomed to flying around with virgins. I might even get
    > >>>my wollon gonged.
    > >>>
    > >>That would be a pain in the butt as they pricked it with the pin.

    > >
    > >Well that's it for my Oz material. Would you mind moving to New Jersey?
    > >

    > Yes. I would mind.


    Minding: Brain bell.
     
  17. Tim Bruening

    Tim Bruening Guest

    nemo wrote:

    > "Tim Bruening" <tsbrueni@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message
    > news:424E4AE4.DD5C31C8@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us...
    > >
    > >
    > > "J. A. Mc." wrote:
    > >
    > > > On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 02:55:43 GMT, Keith E. <i.m.knot@aol.com>

    found
    > these
    > > > unused words floating about:
    > > >
    > > > >Tue, 27 Apr 2004 00:20:34 -0700 was a day just like any other,
    > > > >until Tim Bruening <tsbrueni@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote:
    > > > >>
    > > > >>
    > > > >>"Keith E." wrote:
    > > > >>
    > > > >>> Sat, 24 Apr 2004 21:53:59 GMT was a day just like any other,
    > > > >>> until maelmill@eunet.at (Elisabeth M?ller) wrote:
    > > > >>> >On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 17:27:05 GMT, Keith E. <i.m.knot@aol.com>


    > wrote:
    > > > >>> >>
    > > > >>> >>WORSHIP ME!!!
    > > > >>> >
    > > > >>> >How?
    > > > >>>
    > > > >>> With erotic dances and offerings of beer and chili. Lots of

    beer
    > > > >>> and chili.
    > > > >>
    > > > >>Holy Gas!
    > > > >
    > > > >You'd be surprised by the number of gas holes around here.
    > > >
    > > > Wish they Argon ...

    > >
    > > Helium: Curative gas.

    >
    > Krypton: Secret gas.
    >
    > Krapton: Dinosaur droppings!


    Radon: Mafia gas.
     
  18. nemo

    nemo Guest

    "Tim Bruening" <tsbrueni@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message
    news:48C8B76D.5F4A2BB5@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us...
    >
    >
    > nemo wrote:
    >
    > > "Tim Bruening" <tsbrueni@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message
    > > news:424E4AE4.DD5C31C8@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us...
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > "J. A. Mc." wrote:
    > > >
    > > > > On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 02:55:43 GMT, Keith E. <i.m.knot@aol.com>

    > found
    > > these
    > > > > unused words floating about:
    > > > >
    > > > > >Tue, 27 Apr 2004 00:20:34 -0700 was a day just like any other,
    > > > > >until Tim Bruening <tsbrueni@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote:
    > > > > >>
    > > > > >>
    > > > > >>"Keith E." wrote:
    > > > > >>
    > > > > >>> Sat, 24 Apr 2004 21:53:59 GMT was a day just like any other,
    > > > > >>> until maelmill@eunet.at (Elisabeth M?ller) wrote:
    > > > > >>> >On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 17:27:05 GMT, Keith E. <i.m.knot@aol.com>

    >
    > > wrote:
    > > > > >>> >>
    > > > > >>> >>WORSHIP ME!!!
    > > > > >>> >
    > > > > >>> >How?
    > > > > >>>
    > > > > >>> With erotic dances and offerings of beer and chili. Lots of

    > beer
    > > > > >>> and chili.
    > > > > >>
    > > > > >>Holy Gas!
    > > > > >
    > > > > >You'd be surprised by the number of gas holes around here.
    > > > >
    > > > > Wish they Argon ...
    > > >
    > > > Helium: Curative gas.

    > >
    > > Krypton: Secret gas.
    > >
    > > Krapton: Dinosaur droppings!

    >
    > Radon: Mafia gas.


    Was that beak horse some gay cops staged a radon his hindquarters?
     
  19. nemo

    nemo Guest

    "Tim Bruening" <tsbrueni@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message
    news:48C8B664.6D0A63B2@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us...
    >
    > David Simpson wrote:
    >
    > > On 10 Feb 2004 22:14:11 -0600, "Milton J. Smuthworthy, I"
    > > <tonworthyCLOTHES@SexMagnet.com> typed furiously:
    > >
    > > >
    > > >So then, David Simpson turns to the guy and says:
    > > >>
    > > >>>>>New South Wales is good. Milt could suspend himself there.
    > > >>>Can I fly there on that virgin airline?
    > > >>No, it's already been raped. Quant, as in Mary, did the dirty.
    > > >>>>Noooooo! We'll let you keep him in the manner to which he would like
    > > >>>>to become accustomed.
    > > >>>I could get accustomed to flying around with virgins. I might even

    get
    > > >>>my wollon gonged.
    > > >>>
    > > >>That would be a pain in the butt as they pricked it with the pin.
    > > >
    > > >Well that's it for my Oz material. Would you mind moving to New Jersey?
    > > >

    > > Yes. I would mind.

    >
    > Minding: Brain bell.


    But who's minding the minders??

    Quid custoady 'at custardy o rum!!

    ?1 messy headgear worn by fat froggy things covered in a cornflower dessert
    flavoured with a spirit distilled from molasses.

    And if molasses is a plural, what does one molass look like!

    Aha! I know! The rear end of a small burrowing animal whose skins used to be
    used by a plumber to wipe the molten lead (or mole-eleven if he had an extra
    one) joints in the pipes into shape. (They took the skins off the moles
    first!)

    (I had a go at that once. It ain't arf difficult!)
     
  20. Bob Badour <bbadour@pei.sympatico.ca> found these unused words:

    >Tim Bruening wrote:
    >
    >> Anne Kristin wrote:
    >>
    >>>On 9 Sep, 09:09, Tim Bruening <tsbru...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote:
    >>>
    >>>>1009 years since 9/9/999.
    >>>
    >>>Well done to manage to send this mail 09.09.2009 09:09AM :) I wounder
    >>>how you manage to calculate all these dates. Its amazing anyway

    >>
    >> According to my records, I sent my message at 12:09 AM on September 9.
    >> Where did you get 9:09?

    >
    >It shows on my computer as 4:09am because I am 4 timezones ahead of you.
    >I assume Anne is 5 more timezones ahead of me and 9 timezones ahead of you.


    Assume: Ass, you and 'me' [being Timmette].

    Badour the drawing boards kiddies!
     

Share This Page