Welcome to Saudi Britain

Yeah.. I can say that too Anna.. grateful to be white.. but proud? Come on.. find something else to be proud of.. like not hating someone because of skin pigment, then trying to deny you hate them, but want to preserve them by killing them in a race war..

 

I guess you mean right wing entities like Michelle Malkin from NBC news, because it's so right wing...

Michelle Malkin Inside the University of Delaware brainwashing debacle

 

First off, to deny it's the established norm to denounce people proud of being part of the white race and support someone proud of being part of another race, is denial. It's the established norm in the US, just as the established expectation that if you are a white Christian male you are expected to take crap from everyone and if you say it isn't right you are insensative.

 

People aint too bright if they believe that.. sounds like guilt talk to me.. waaaaaaaa.. I'm a victim for being white.. everyone can be proud of their skin pigment but us..

And why would that be? Cause we've might = righted the world based on skin pigment for centuries? Perhaps most whites know that skin pigment is no source of pride.

Insensitive or not..I don't give a crap how much melanin someone has in their skin..

aint nothin' to be proud of, Rusty. ~ Clark W. Griswold


I'd say the same to any bigot no matter what color they are on the outside.




Lets take pride in having an inny belly button vs. an outie... and kill them to prove it...

Death to outies!

I am now forming an Inny nationalist movement to preserve and admire.. Someone kill an outie so I can get started on my lifes mission..

 

This is where you show your limited knowledge on the subject. Do some research in forensic Athropology, there is much more to the differences in race beyond skin color and melanin content, otherwise it would be impossible for us to determine race by degraded remains and not at all by skeletal remains alone.

As for the whole, white guilt thing, just because you harbor "white guilt" doesn't mean it's right, in modern society to let it guide you, nor does it mean we all live by it, nor should they, just as the definicion of racist as the U of D says, which includes you, is the only definition.

 

I don't harbor white guilt.. I never killed anyone cause of their skin pigment.. Problem is, we are still might = righting people based on skin pigment.. and as you know..

Whatever is ok for you to do to another human being, is ok for every other human being to do to you.


The only part of a human being that makes a difference to me is the brain and how it's used.

I guess I'm a racist against bigots who think skin pigment and bone structure make a man .. yay me.

 

And so should the blacks, Asians, Hispanics, etc........ They ALL have something to be ashamed of and proud of. Black enslaved blacks. Asian committed genocide on other Asians. The list goes on and on all the way to the two cave man clans.

 

So it's ok for you to make a broad generalization about a group of people, but not for someone else.

Sounds a bit hypocritical to me.

I gave the general opinion of society on white, christian males not being able to be offended, but your general opinon of us being a might = right people, is ok.

Your broad description of whites and our society as a whole is just as much of a bigoted sterotype as any skinhead. Skinheads are just willing to "own" the truth, you aren't.

Hypocrit.

One of the main differences between me and you is you live in the world of make believe and how things should be and I deal in the real world with everyday folk, of all sorts of backgrounds and ethnicities on a daily basis, under crisis situations, under times of joy, under times of thankfulness, under times of anger, under times of outrage, under times of distress, times of complete trauma, times of total violation to their lives and bodies, I've had to tell loved ones their family members are dead, these people are strangers but have had to deal with their pain at that time and confort them, I have traveled to many parts of the world, dealt with people in those places, people striving for true freedom not the false cries of many in the US, and base my views on this interaction, I make my opinions.

Please, don't even try to tell me you know of what real people are more than me.

 

And race cannot always be determined from a skeleton.. despite your worldly knowledge on forensic anthropology.

Matter of fact, I did a presentation on facial forensic reconstruction at the end of my cadaver dissection class last year... on the differences between negroids, mongolians, and caucasians.. not an exact science, nor court worthy.. but can help ID missing persons. Bad insult.. try again..

 

Errrr.. we are might = right people as a group, Not as individuals.

Hahahaha.. ok.. you know "real people" more than me..


Please, don't even try to tell me you know what hypocrites are more than me..

 

I don't remember saying anything about facial forensics. I guess you want to limit the topic to something you think you can speak of. Hypocrit.

 

More blanket generalizations, just because you say it doesn't make it so.

 

Well.. what kind of forensics were you taking about and how do you think they determine race from a skeleton? If there's intact skin at all, they don't need to take an educated guess at race..

And I'm a hypocrite how?

 

Are you drunk?

Or in denial?

Or perhaps your a bit sore at me for another reason?

 

How can the quote...

be determined as anything more than a blanket generalization? It's the same as a bigot saying that all Jews are money hungry.

It's a blanket generalization of a population.

Hypocrit.

No sore feelings. Amazing how when I point the mirror at you I have to be doing it from a point of hate or alterior motive, but when you do it, it's enlightening.

Hypocrit.

 

The skull is a major part of the puzzle but as with all credible science, it's a totality of the evidence that determines the result, not just the skull. More cherry picking?

Yes you are.

 

Not all whites subscribe to might = right, or condone it.. Better?

Nor does the might = right theory a monopoly to white people.. Every race on Earth has it's might = right freaks..

Better?

 

Can you get a bit more specific and share your worldy knowledge on forensic anthropology?

Not that credible a science.. Not admissible in court..

And I'm a hypocrite how again? How can that be? I don't condemn anyone for anything..

Did I condemn someone for making generalizations?

Please explain

 

Blacks have been enslaved, bought and sold by whites via might = right.

Whites have never been enslaved, bought and sold by blacks via might = right.

Got a problem with those statements?

 

And another thing.. are you trying to prove FA correct by forensic anthropology for him? What's your point?

Can't he argue his own arguments?

Bone structure and skin pigment are the foundation of your argument?


Am I a hypocrite for judging, labeling, and looking down on someone for hating people for bone structure and skin pigment whilst I myself hate someone for bone structure and skin pigment?

I don't hate people who hate people based on bone structure and skin pigment, so how am I a hypocrite here?

Please explain