Nothing concerning me at the Jungle was ever held in the open.. Manipulators are the only ones that like closed doors.. For example... a complaint was made against me.. sure, I was a smartass and the admins can see the post and decide.. but did the complainant include the killer comments from themselves naming me in this post before I ever replied to it in their case file? I highly doubt it.. Here's where it becomes.. "squeaky wheel gets the grease".. I aint no squeaky wheel and don't plan on becoming one..
Re: New Rule On Conduct Completely untrue. Off the top of my head I can think of a post I made for you, and how to better get along with people there (because the pm'ing wasn't working. I thought maybe an open shot for people to explain to you the things they were telling me would help you- it didn't.) All that did was upset you, you started chasing people around then, making snide comments whenever they disagreed with you on other topics, and eventually led to your banning. Doing that in the open did nothing to help the situation. Heck, Feckless even made the vote to bring you back a public vote. You were most certainly handled publicly, and when that failed to work, it went private. All handling things publicly did was give you more ammo as to who was not happy with you.
Re: New Rule On Conduct Did you notice that the one who made the original "killer" comment on this thread was doing so as an example of how it was bad to do such a thing?
Re: New Rule On Conduct Yes, it was quite slick, and naming me with the statement "because he killed his child" was quite appropriate.. Did I say something to TJ worse than that as "a personal attack"?
So the killer quote was appropiate, mine weren't? I don't see where TJ got a demerit.. I hadn't even replied to this thread at that point..
Re: New Rule On Conduct I can't respond to this, as I wasn't the one who made the decision, but I would say that, it went back to the staff members assessment of the intent.
Re: New Rule On Conduct Why do you have to see it? I had this same convo with an opponent of yours the other day wez- Just because you don't see everything doesn't mean it isn't happening. It may or may not be, but the truth of it isn't dependent on your viewing of it.
Re: New Rule On Conduct Hahahahaha.. and the intent of calling wez a killer because he killed his child was? I think you can take a wild guess...
Re: New Rule On Conduct I have to see it because it's on my profile on the side.. that's why. Can't you see it? Now TJ calling me a killer is justified and validated for him while he's immune to my shots.. cool. What's new?
Re: New Rule On Conduct Nope, I cannot see that on your info. Not the infraction part anyway. edit: whoa, we got split... lol
Re: New Rule On Conduct Do I present a valid point, chief? Do I present a valid point eddo? Anyone? Too good a point perhaps? I know the last thing you guys would ever want is me whining to you.. trust me. Right, eddo? Permission to call eddo a dumbass, sir? Hahahahahahahaha
Re: New Rule On Conduct I dunno. I do think "intent" is a very hard thing to prove online, and that is going to be a hard concept for many of us to get behind. Like when you called TJ a liberal. I know your style, so I knew right away that it was a slam. Others, that don't know you as well, thought it was just a typo. I don't think TJ meant it as an attack when he referred to you being called a "killer," but it did make his point that even in context, it shouldn't be allowed. Did you catch that I can't see your infraction level? So maybe then you can't see other's infraction levels?
Re: New Rule On Conduct Sure seems easy to prove when it's me... and you're objective.. not biased in any way.. even though you have a yearly pass on the TJ express.. Hahahahahaha Yeah, I caught that eddo... no prob. My goal is to be in the idiot box within the week.. By merely telling the truth.. quite annoyingly mind you..
Re: New Rule On Conduct I'm not quite as cool as you.. What about that point? Poor answer... not accepted.