Are you informed? What I want to read in this thread from any member.

NO

I heard Hunter was allowed to keep a meager percentage of that monstrous sum paid to Jobie, disguised as Hunter’s compensation.

 

He already was interviewed in 2020 by both the FBI and the Ron Johnson led Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs. I believe both under oath. Guess what, he didn't verify his story about the "big guy" to either of these groups, or I guarantee it would have been everywhere. Why would he say one thing in public and another under oath?

 

Source? Again, why the complete avoidance of the firearm felony? You’re a self avowed advocate of firearm restrictions. Are you a hypocrite? Will you not agree to enforce the present laws?

 

Daily caller, a clearly right wing source.

FBI interview + intention to testify before the Senate committee

Met with Ron Johnson to talk information privately, scheduled to testify before the committee

NYTimes, which you may not appreciate, but the link to the committee report is midway through the article so I thought it was a useful way to redirect to the primary source.

No evidence of wrongdoing on Joe Biden's part

It's weird you keep bringing it up. It's entirely unrelated to Joe, so I don't care in the context of this thread.

 

My apologies Gene,

I forgot you are out of the country. I don't expect you to know as much as we do anymore. I'll go easy on you from now on but the only other uninformed regular poster lives in the USA. Shame on him!

 

Okay but when will you be showing me the testimony by Hunter's business associates?

 

You posted 2020 news. The “ rightwing news sources” you posted confirm that everything Tony Bobulinski submitted is true. The NYT post stopped me at the third paragraph with a a paywall but I did see the leftist 2020 narrative of Russian propaganda. You referenced the NTY’S , the disgraced news organization, same as the Washington Post, They both received national awards for Disinformation and yet YOU only admitted recently that they were wrong.
The subject of this post is “Are you informed “. In the spirit of being informed, why do you Tell us why Hunter can’t be prosecuted for a firearm felony?

 

Yes, which notably did not include anything implicating Joe Biden. Unless, are you suggesting Ron Johnson and co of the committee merely forgot to include that in their report?

Get a better internet browser, or alternatively https://12ft.io/

You're confusing "subject" with "title"

I'm still really not interested in following whatever tangent you see fit. Start a new thread if you like.

 

Sorry, I don't have access to Hunter's laptop. The people who do have been reporting on what Hunter said in his own words for over a month!

So please crawl back down into the foggy black hole of ignorance so you can continue to entertain us.

 

Isn't it somewhat ironic that we see all this damning information on the Biden's and the general consensus among the left is to the effect of, "well, lets just wait and see what the investigation finds".... Yet when a conservative has a wild accusation leveled the skies seem to open up with all the loud catcalling?

 

Profiler asked: "Gene, Tell us why Hunter can’t be prosecuted for a firearm felony?

I CRY FOUL! THIS IS NOT A FAIR QUESTION to ask most people, especially Gene and his ilk. Without looking it up (not in a progressive rag) I GUARANTEE that he has no idea of the circumstances around Hunter, his girlfriend who took the gun, the guy who found the gun in the trash, or what the cops did not do about it. You cannot have a valid discussion with an ignorant poster.

 

Unlike the Shifty Shif show the democrats are airing on TV (where comedy shows belong), our Justice System provides anyone giving testimony to be CROSS EXAMINED under oath.

Oh, that's not going on? I guess I'm as ignorant as others here are!

 

On his son, who is not president. What have you seen damning against Joe? Literally all they've got is an allusion to "the big guy" with no record of money leading up Joe, and nobody willing to say under oath "the big guy" even is Joe. I don't care what Hunter does, it's not like Joe is giving him jobs in the white house

 

Frankly Gene.... I couldn't give a hoot about his son myself. What I do give a hoot about is the gross hypocrisy that exists. Trump and his children spent four years dodging all manner of front page headlines baseless crap thrown their direction and you know that to be the case. And here we have blatant overtly salacious stuff that is written at the hand of a Biden that is just ho-hum to the sheeples..... I will point out the overt hypocrisy until it is acknowledged and corrected.

 

Gene,

When "they" are done blackmailing him and his crime family (hopefully while we are both alive and still have a country), your ignorance will be on display. For all we know, you just might be a Chinese woman stealing secrets in your field of research from a US company while posting disinformation to bring down MY COUNTRY! Your posts and failure to answer direct questions indicate that might be the case.

 

You're correct, to a point. There was a lot of things Trump did, there was a lot he didn't do. I think his bombastic personality and willingness to engage with every scandal made him an exciting target for the media.

Where I disagree with you, is that it's fair game to equate scandals of Hunter with scandals of Trump's adult children. The key difference being, Joe didn't make Hunter a worker in his administration, give him top secret clearance, or have him negotiating deals on behalf of the United States government with foreign countries.

I see validity in checking the Hunter Biden stuff to make sure nothing improper happened with Joe (which is exactly what the Senate committee on Homeland security found by the way), but beyond that I don't care what Hunter does as a private citizen.