BO wants to raise our taxes $1 trillion???

Discussion in 'Politics' started by David, Jul 11, 2011.

  1. rlm's cents
    Hot

    rlm's cents Well-Known Member

    So you think all of the poor people are going to hire the unemployed? That plan is almost as good as BO's.
     
  2. craig a

    craig a New Member

    I didnt say that the poor were going to hire anyone. But I dont see billionaires hiring anyone either. And yes its an unsure economy, so why would billionaires take a risk on hiring. But costs less to pay more taxes for a short time than it is to hire people for a long time. They are after all getting tax breaks and subsidies in order to add to the work force. That isnt panning out. We are all in it ya know. Where does this 50% of middle class dont pay income tax come from? And if an unemployed guy takes time to volunteer as a crossing guard or help out in a library because thats all he can do, then it isnt unreasonable to ask billionaires for a little bit more. Just an example, lets not focus on the crossing guard thing.
     
  3. rlm's cents
    Hot

    rlm's cents Well-Known Member

    They won't hire - so long as the government keeps threatening to increase their taxes and costs. Get the government fingers out of the way and see what happens

    "But costs less to pay more taxes for a short time than it is to hire people for a long time." You are kidding, aren't you? BO's "recovery" bill cost $250,000 per job. That should have created 4 or 5 new jobs in the private sector.

    "Where does this 50% of middle class dont pay income tax come from?" The federal government. High-Earning Households Pay Growing Share of Taxes - WSJ.com
     
  4. craig a

    craig a New Member

    250,000 in the long run? Thats not much over 15 years. And I said the tax increase would be short term. But they werent hiring when there was no threat. And it hasnt happened, it that going to be the excuse forever? And thanks for the link.
     
  5. rlm's cents
    Hot

    rlm's cents Well-Known Member

    No! $250,000 in 6 to 18 months. Say for 1 year.
     
  6. David

    David Proud Enemy of Hillary

    I don't mention it much but in case some of you have forgotten, I consult with businesses for a living. Dr PHD can call it antecdotal all he wants but businesses are leery to move in our current environment. One can't argue that, in some segments, profits are up. Profits are up & cash is building up. But these businesses truly want to spend, expand & hire. They are simply waiting to see what is going to happen.
     
  7. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Clown Hater

    Moen can shove this up his anecdotal butt. When Steve Wynn (D), who has created more jobs in the casino industry than probably anyone else in the world, says the current administration is hindering economic expansion, everyone no matter political affiliation should listen. He isn't Donald Trump looking for a headline to satisfy his unimaginable narcissism. He is one of richest most successful men in the world. Clowns like Moen should stop spouting off about things they know nothing about and listen to the people like Steve Wynn, who actually does know.

    Hey Moen,

    Scoreboard!

    Wynn is worth over a billion. What is your net worth? Why should anyone listen to you, CLOWN?
     
  8. craig a

    craig a New Member

    Well this presidency has about 18 months to go. Are they going to wait that long? Or are they going to wait a year after the next election? Or two years? Are they simply waiting due to your consultation? Or in dispite it?
     
  9. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Clown Hater

    At this point, I believe that some companies are purposefully refusing to spend their capital in order to perpetuate a stagnant economy and ensure a Republican President in 2012. A very dangerous strategy IMO, and the reason why I support increasing taxes on the rich.
     
  10. David

    David Proud Enemy of Hillary

    Joke about it all you want but it is my experience "they" are just waiting until they know what their tax liabilities are going to be & what Obamacare is going to cost before jumping in.
    Say you were considering building a new house, would you go forward with the project if you were uncertain what it would cost or what your income was going to be?
     
  11. De Orc

    De Orc Well-Known Member

  12. craig a

    craig a New Member

    It wasnt a joke. What are you consulting them to do? We arent talking about the corner deli. As you said, profits are up and they are sitting on money. If I were to get a huge tax break to build that house and planned on building it anyway, I would.
     
  13. David

    David Proud Enemy of Hillary

    But, as things sit today, you have no idea if you have a tax break or large increase coming, right? With a little clarity businesses are able to make those decisions. Thanks for helping make my point!
     
  14. craig a

    craig a New Member

    I guess we'll never know how you consult these leaders of industry. So your point is that if big business loses that huge tax break, they will no longer hire? Yet the profit will still come? albeit less than with the tax break. Good for the business. Bad for the country. And isnt that the point really? To keep this country going. To keep it prosperous for all? To make it united again. Dont you think its time we eschew the ''mine, mine , me, me'' philosophy of yesterday behind? At least for now.
     
  15. David

    David Proud Enemy of Hillary

    So, you would charge forward with big plans without knowing for certain how your liabilities and obligations may be effected by impending governmental changes? Are you sure about that? Can you imagine a scenario where this reckless behavior could be bad for those currently employed?
     
  16. craig a

    craig a New Member

    ''With a little clarity businesses are able to make those decisions.''-David. They've been waiting for six years. The free ride is over for everyone.
     
  17. David

    David Proud Enemy of Hillary

    The free ride may be over but until one knows what the new fare is going to be they will probably defer getting on that bus.
     
  18. Stujoe

    Stujoe Well-Known Member

    Say you were considering building a new casino, would you go forward with the project if you don't have customers with enough disposable income to fill the casinos you have? Or would you downsize your workforce and sit on your cash? That is a lot closer to what is going on in our economy.
     
  19. craig a

    craig a New Member

    WTF are you talking about? ''And while the seats may be occupied by fat people who are too weighed down to reach the stop cord of opportunity, the bus keeps rolling towards its final stop of doom.''. And you have the audacity to call other statements stupid? Your use of metaphors is atrocious.
     
  20. tomcorona

    tomcorona Anti republican truther



    please..the rich mans tax cuts get extended, and they creat no jobs. The threat of them paying more causes them to not create jobs. The cause is greed, further caused by the right wing corporate elitists. This whole mess started under Bush, as he passed out cash to his kronies.
     

Share This Page