Breaking news on the Mark Levin Radio Show

Discussion in 'Politics' started by What U ignore, May 21, 2024.

  1. What U ignore

    What U ignore Thread KILLER

    Sooner or later the ignorant :confused: Liberal members MIGHT hear about this.

    The FBI was authorized to use deadly force when Trump's home was raided.

    BTW :confused:Liberals, can you at least admit that Trump was bugged by the FBI before the election. You have had about a decade to learn about the VERY OLD NEWS. Have any of you dummies decided that Biden is a crook? More old news.
    __________________________________________________________________________
    Posting with Liberals is so nothing.
     
  2. Mopar Dude

    Mopar Dude Well-Known Member

    No way. I listen to Levin in the morning on his podcast. That just cannot be right.
     
  3. What U ignore

    What U ignore Thread KILLER

    The woman who broke the story was on his show tonight. She got the scoop. A medic was in the raid and a local hospital was chosen. They knew Trump was not there but they were authorized to put down any Secret Service resistance.
     
  4. CoinOKC
    Fiendish

    CoinOKC T R U M P

    Oh, it's ABSOLUTELY true. And it's ABSOLUTELY disgusting.

    It's so sad to see how much the liberals have dragged this country into the gutter. Sickening.

    -Edited- all you -edited- liberals. You're destroying this great country!

    President Trump said today that joe briben is a threat to democracy. I'll add to that and say that briben is also a threat to our Republic.
     
  5. Profiler
    Inspired

    Profiler Well-Known Member

    Brought top secret cover sheets, staged photos, AND authorized deadly force…. @GeneWright, haven’t you and I had a discussion about this raid before???
     
  6. GeneWright

    GeneWright Well-Known Member

    I was hoping you'd be here as a voice of reason as to how boilerplate the statement is and what a non-story this is. Alas.

    This preprinted statement is that they are quoting, and it's been on everything they've done since 2000. I'm no fan of the police state either, but let's not pretend this was exceptional 20240522_110147.jpg
     
  7. What U ignore

    What U ignore Thread KILLER

    I love it when Liberal apologists' try to appear informed. Perhaps the word "exceptional" is not familiar to you. LET'S PRETEND YOU GO LOOK THE WORD UP IN THE DICTIONARY. Then let's pretend you are a worthwhile member willing to share opinions so our time is not being wasted with fly-by excuses. NOW, Please tell all of us what is not EXCEPTIONAL about the raid on a past POTUS home.

    NEWSFLASH: I just posted a 30 second bite (deadly force) of a thirty minute interview of a real journalist researching the raid! As usual, make excuses. I'm beginning to think you are a "plant" to spread disinformation. Let's see all the other pages they used for the raid, the research into hospitals, the conversations between Biden's handlers and the crooked Justice Dept. Why don't you answer direct questions Mr. Deflector?

    Can you tell us why conservatives get raided in the middle of the night or early morning and the enemies of America do not? Rather than raid Biden's homes and offices, his lawyers were warned to turn over the classified documents he stole without authorization. And the old traitor is to brain dead and feeble to be prosecuted.

    Gene, you and your ilk are either blind to the truth, see it yet cannot admit what you see, or worst of all, you are in on it and love what you have succeeded in doing to this country.
     
  8. Mopar Dude

    Mopar Dude Well-Known Member

    Well.... Seems the report has merit. In an effort to play devils advocate and try to view this thing fairly.... Having no experience with a federal raid or implementation of search warrants...... Is the use of deadly force possibly inherent in these sorts of actions? If I were being served a warrant for not paying child support for instance... Would the use of deadly force be authorized?
     
  9. GeneWright

    GeneWright Well-Known Member

    The use of deadly force is authorized at a traffic stop. It's always "authorized" should the need arise. The FBI spelling it out is actually a restriction on their ability to use deadly force.

    Some of the finer details vary state by state, but the police can always take your life if they feel threatened.
     
  10. Mopar Dude

    Mopar Dude Well-Known Member

    Perhaps… But a deeper dive into this shows that the use of deadly force was specifically preordained in this raid. Absolutely shameful.
     
  11. Profiler
    Inspired

    Profiler Well-Known Member

    Doesn’t the raid on Mar a Lago, the first time ever raid on an ex president, not warrant specific language?
    Obviously not. Staged evidence photos, the immediately release of those photos to the media, and recent reports that evidence is not in order is not standard SOP. Why in the world would anyone believe their excuse that they are just following standard procedures now?
    I understand you have no personal experience with investigations especially those involving confidential documents.
     
    CoinOKC likes this.
  12. GeneWright

    GeneWright Well-Known Member

    Only if you believe the president is above the law and deserves a double standard
     
  13. GeneWright

    GeneWright Well-Known Member

    Yes but specifically preordained in a boilerplate manner. It's just something written on every form y'all are freaking out about.

    I want it gone too, I want way less deadly force acceptability. We clearly have a problem with law enforcement exercising deadly force. I just want it for everyone, not just "special" people
     
  14. Profiler
    Inspired

    Profiler Well-Known Member

    What is your standard? State the standard of raids on previous Presidents. Hell, show us the standards for a sitting president. [edit]:

    I’m sorry, if the sitting president is an “ elderly old man with a poor memory” is that an excuse?
     
  15. Profiler
    Inspired

    Profiler Well-Known Member

    So you are absolutely cool with no bail. Illegals killing innocent civilians and being just…. OH WELL…. You are obviously anti law enforcement. You are definitely anti military based on your previous posts.
     
  16. GeneWright

    GeneWright Well-Known Member

    Why should they have special treatment over any American citizen? Is it only presidents for you? What about senators? Or city mayors?

    Do you only think we should give special treatment to government workers? Any other groups you think should get a double standard over you and I?
     
  17. Profiler
    Inspired

    Profiler Well-Known Member

    OH!!! Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, Peter Strzok, Fani Willis and her boyfriend. Why do these groups, government officials get a better standard than us? I can go on and on.
    Why did CNN just happen to be at the raid at Rodger Stone’s home?
     
  18. GeneWright

    GeneWright Well-Known Member

    I mean yeah, you can continue to deflect. At the core here though it seems like you're opposed to special treatment for government employees. Cool, me too. But that's in direct contradiction to your previous posts here... So which is it?
     
  19. Profiler
    Inspired

    Profiler Well-Known Member

    I’m not deflecting you are.
    You are trying to obfuscate. Yes, political individuals should be hold accountable. Why are all the leftist let go?
    I’ve posed questions that you seem to have purposely ignored. Is that because you don’t want to debate?
     
  20. GeneWright

    GeneWright Well-Known Member

    I reject this premise. Leftists have frequently been tried and held accountable. You should know that "getting the verdict you want" ~= justice

    "Doesn’t the raid on Mar a Lago, the first time ever raid on an ex president, not warrant specific language?"

    I have been doing nothing for the last few posts but addressing that question.

    "Why in the world would anyone believe their excuse that they are just following standard procedures now?"

    This is the only other question there, and it seemed rhetorical on account of being vague and open-ended. My bad if that's not the case
     

Share This Page