The op ;ooks like a straight up news story to me. And, I doubt the AmVets would fire her based upon those comments.
No different than when he had every potential staff member and WH employee fill out highly intrusive paperwork into their personal lives including whether or not they owned a firearm or if there was one at their residence. We can assume none who did were hired or retained. It's his way or the highway. There is no freedom. There is no free speech. Remember, "The republicans can come along for the ride, but they're gonna hafta sit in the back!". This little firing may seem small in the grand scheme of things but it speaks volumes. Once again. Prepare for the LAMEST of lame duck sessions in this country's history over the next 2 years. They all may as well stay home, including Obama.
Read the last sentence of this item on the AmVets official site: http://www.amvets.org/legislative.html I would hazard to guess that any organization that "works closely" with the administration would take issue with one of their leaders blasting BO personally. They may just let that little incident weigh on their decision to cut someone loose. Just maybe?
That says it all!! If you wanted to know, you'd go to the Huffington Post right? No spin or bias there! LMFAO!!! What a retard.
Angry with name calling. I think that fits into a prior post concerning the right wing disillusion. Wouldn't wanna stereotype though. Oh crap! I thought I was posting a response typical of lehigh. My mistake! LOL
Oh, c'mon, clembo, you're as guilty as any other member here of lowering the bar (but it is refreshing to see a brief post coming from you!).
Actually David, I think Clembo and Danr are the most reasonable of the left leaners......notice how they both kinda dropped off the radar? Hmmmm
Just maybe they work with any administration that happens to be in power. Just maybe, they would then have had to fine anyone who would have criticized Bush during his administration. And every time there is a change in parties they, just maybe, go and fire all the people who don't like the current administration. Or, just maybe, it is all hooey.
LOL! Great point. Now all that's here are the far left extremist whackos who are like dealing with the insane. They argue with such confidence because they can never be wrong! The facts are whatever they dream up in their own minds. Or how they feel that day. Or, (the crowd favorite) the facts can be disregarded altogether (deflected) by picking out one line of a post and taking the argument in a completely different direction. Also, any wild, quote or action from the left can be justified by simply interjecting a negative counterpoint concerning Rush Limbaugh or George Bush.
Well, it looks like you missed the point yet again young man. I'll help you out though. Concerning what was written, if you disagree with an argument, it would be more productive to post a logical, counter argument, thereby staying on topic. If you agree that someone such as Arrianna Huffington is an out of touch extremist with a radical agenda and a news organization for a front, then simply agree. Posting a one liner about Bush's new book is the first grader approach. Maybe the best thing you could do is just read and not post at all. That's easier and fool proof. It's better to be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt. Moen seems to have caught on. What about you? It's ok. We'll do this in baby steps and I'll help you.