Yet somehow the idiots on the left think the right is misogynistic. Failing the children of California A new law decriminalizing child prostitution puts children at greater risk ANALYSIS/OPINION: At the start of each new year we’re subjected to a whole host of new laws. The modern liberal government, you see, imagines itself not as the champion of individual freedom but as Mommy and Daddy, a taskmaster charged with controlling your life. Most of the time, it makes everything, including our lives, worse. Case in point: California. Completely at the mercy of the left, which now controls two-thirds of the state government, California serves as a living illustration of what the left really wants to accomplish. As of Jan. 1, that includes decriminalizing what is commonly called “child prostitution.” They may not have technically legalized it, but decriminalizing the act per se will have the same results, while putting exploited children in even more danger. First, let’s make one thing clear right now: There is no such thing as “child prostitution.” The fact is we’re dealing with the sex trafficking of girls and boys. This isn’t some horror reserved for Thailand or some other far-off place — it’s happening right here in the United States. More than 1,000 children are arrested each year for prostitution, with estimates of sex trafficking involving 100,000 to 2.4 million children. Concerned Women for America reports, “The United States Department of Justice uses the number 293,000 as the estimate for youth ‘at risk’ of being commercially sexually http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jan/4/california-law-decriminalizing-child-prostitution-/
Another pathetic, dishonest thread. The California law does not "legalize" child prostitution. Its purpose is to prevent victims of sex trafficking from being doubly victimized by being prosecuted for their own exploitation. Child prostitution is definitely still illegal in California, and those who exploit children will still be prosecuted (source).
so it "decriminalizes" the child. If you want to play word salad and say that is not "legalize", what is the difference?
To be fair, I've noticed quite a few misleading story titles from particular Democratic sites. I'm disappointed in them. While the stories themselves have some grains of truth in them, they are less than honest, and so I treat them accordingly, just as I would with these republican/conservative/ and even Russian web sites. Our Intelligence agencies have repeatedly mentioned that Russians have made efforts to disseminate false information through sites they've created that mimic conservative sites. In case you missed the obvious, some conservative sites are actually Russian-created and operated. In other words, Russians are like conservatives, in that they both have no issue with releasing false information that is intended to mislead the American public. There is no getting away from those facts, many republican memes are in line with Russian agendas.
The notable differences between myself and most republicans on these points is that I recognize that the sites are misleading and I don't trust them where they have no issue with misleading information and will use it to attack political opponents. I believe the majority of Democrats are like me, in those respects.
Ha! That's the best insult I've seen anyone cast at dimocrats....ever! I wonder how many dims would take offense at being called a lazy, no account, pathetic piece of toothless sh*t?
His idea of a reputable source is the original fake news source- Dan Rather. The guy who got fired as a network news caster for making up crap! Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!!!