Finally! After Decades of Trying, We have Sanity in Our Health Care System

this stops before it esculates ok

 

I made no such insinuation and if my comment hit a little to close to home, so be it (not that there's anything wrong with that)....I guess I should just be thankful that it is my wife your'e fantasizing about & not my dad or brother, huh? Say it loud, say it proud.

 

Isn't that interesting? Davey spins it as "having to do legwork...blah,blah,blah" when asked to back up his demented propaganda. Then he calls it "dodging" when when you ignore the same made up propaganda he vomits from Fox talking points.
So remember....we have neither the time nor desire to, blah,blah,blah.... check.

 

I have a request. If you are going to post this over an over again in every thread, could you at least provide a count of how many times David has ignored the same question at the bottom of each post? That way, the rest of us can also be entertained. Maybe we could do a contest to see how high the count will get before he caves and admits what we all know.

I Most certainly can Lehigh

 

Just a word in my defense....true, I ignored dorc's first request "for a link" precisely for the reason I stated. As far as his continued badgering, I was on vacation & out of the country for nearly 2 weeks. I answered him honestly once I returned & saw his pleas. Just because I didn't give the answer you wanted doesn't mean I dodged, the tag "dodger" is equally shared my tomcorona & moen (tomcoronalight, maybe?). I am not going to waste the time researching a defense for something we all heard over a year ago and has been repeated in the national news ever since. I did read coronalight's post referring to Christine Roemer & it's true she did make the initial case for the stimulus keeping u/e under 8.5%..in fact BO thought so highly of her advice that she won a WH position as a result. Now, does anyone here really believe BO wouldn't cite Roemer's numbers as he was crossing the country making the case for his stimulus package?

 

David it's De Orc or steve now I would appreciate you adressing me in the same polite manner that I do you But if you realy want to get into a little childishness then I am only to happy to oblige you and treat you like one. To date you have not given me a answer and I have only asked after you have posted, so lets not try and twist the truth any more.
As for badgering I am doing exactly what you yourself are renowned for doing. You quoted it as fact and coudnt back up your words but as I expected you are not man enough to admit you were wrong. Even in your above post you still try to insinuate he said it!

 

Point out a question I dodged...PLEASE! Even when you demanded I quote the source of a comment I made, you continue to parade around claiming that you, "outed me". Hardly! I even posted the source of your bogus promise by Obama and you completely ignored it. You cherry pick your information and are unable to defend your own points of view. Why should or would any of us lend you or your rants any credibility whatsoever? You do exactly the same thing Midas did very regularly. He refused to answer a direct question and then would state that he did answer it but we just didn't like his answer. The truth was, neither of you answered the question and you have been bobbing and ducking like the most cunning politicians out there. You can lie to yourself but we see your words in print and all you can do is go back and edit out all of your own words from every post or we will keep beating you over the head with them.

This is my favorite sentence from your post. It speaks volumes about you. "I am not going to waste the time researching a defense for something we all heard over a year ago and has been repeated in the national news ever since." Do you believe everything you hear on the national news? You seem very reluctant to search for truth but seem to prefer the answers be spoon fed to you by cherry picked sources. I grow wary of your regurgitated perspectives.

 

How about the NUMEROUS times I've asked you to respond to the couple of common sense alternatives I offered in response to BO's massive takeover of healthcare?
And it's disappointing to see your spin on being nailed for stealing Pelosi's words and trying to pass them off as your own (what were you saying about talking points? Marching orders?). I guess in a world where BO pilfers the words of Duval Patrick for his campaign speeches (and none of his blind supporters cares) I shouldn't be surprised.

 

C'mon moen, it's been a couple of days now. Are you dodging?

 

I think that I made you wait just the right amount of time.

Maybe you can point out the post you asked these question in. Just give me the post number and I'll look them up myself. Unless your just making this up or are unwilling to do even this much to prove your point.

Since I doubt you'll do this, let me ask you a question. How does the new health care law represent a "massive takeover of health care"? Which aspects represent a "takeover"? Why not just call it what it is...the government regulating an industry which is what they are supposed to do? We all already know that the "government takeover" rhetoric is nothing more than a Frank Luntz right wing talking point which now that the legislation has been passed has been proven completely false yet you keep repeating it. Are you still looking for death panels too.