Mr Moen/Joe (disgrace to his ) Nations approved of this !!! But denounces.......

Pedophile!

 

Murderer!

 

Ain't this just so much fun!

 

It is the same BS you normally espouse. Why should it be any more fun than usual?

 

Little Joe still finds Slinkys fascinating so I'm not surprised that he finds the most mundane things amusing.

View attachment 1592

 

OK...I think this thread has run it's course because I made my point. Mr Moen has had days and numerous opportunitys to denounce this activity by this "doctor" yet he has chosen not to. Now......the point:

If that "doctor" had killed those kids with an AR-15, semiauto handgun or even a revolver......we would have seen a thread with him accusing me of condoning it because I was a gun nut......all NRA members would have been the target of his " anger" and discust. WE ALL KNOW IT.

Thanks for playing along, Mr Moen......You care about kids WHEN IT FITS YOUR ANTI GUN AGENDA

Now I'll go back to lurking on ocassion

 

Just remember to always keep assault weapons and handguns legal and available to criminals and terrorists alike by supporting the gun lobby and also remember to prevent background checks so that people like the Boston Marathon bombers can purchase more weapons without interference. Never mind the young police officer they shot with those guns YOU helped provide. I'm sure his family is OK with it.

 

Are you claiming these terrorists purchased handguns legally?

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/04/21/us-usa-explosions-boston-guns-idUSBRE93K0HB20130421

How would the defeated gun legislation have here?
I think this incident actually proves the case made against the legislation, don't you?

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brief...spects-not-licensed-to-own-guns#ixzz2R9aLSDwS

 

The last time I asked for some facts, this is the answer I got.

The facts just are not going his way this time so he is trying to blow smoke up our asses.

 

WASHINGTON -- Adolphus Busch IV, heir to the Busch family brewing fortune, resigned his lifetime membership in the National Rifle Association on Thursday, writing in a letter to NRA President David Keene, "I fail to see how the NRA can disregard the overwhelming will of its members who see background checks as reasonable."

The resignation, first reported by KSDK, came a day after the Senate rejected a series of amendments to a gun control bill, including a bipartisan deal to expand background checks for gun sales. The NRA had vigorously opposed all those measures.

"The NRA I see today has undermined the values upon which it was established," wrote Busch. "Your current strategic focus clearly places priority on the needs of gun and ammunition manufacturers while disregarding the opinions of your 4 million individual members."

Reached for comment on Busch's resignation, NRA spokesman Andrew Arulanandam told The Huffington Post, "We disagree with his characterization, but we wish him all the best."

Busch joined the pro-gun organization in 1975 and has spoken before of his love of hunting. But the NRA has moved in a direction that Busch would not follow. "One only has to look at the makeup of the 75-member board of directors, dominated by manufacturing interests, to confirm my point. The NRA appears to have evolved into the lobby for gun and ammunition manufacturers rather than gun owners," he wrote.

Busch told Keene, "It disturbs me greatly to see this rigid new direction of the NRA." He singled out the gun lobby's reversal of its 1999 position in favor of universal background checks, as well as its opposition to an assault weapons ban and a ban on high-capacity magazines. "I am simply unable to comprehend how assault weapons and large capacity magazines have a role in your vision," he wrote.

"Was it not the NRA position to support background checks when Mr. LaPierre himself stated in 1999 that NRA saw checks as 'reasonable'?" Busch wrote, referring to NRA CEO Wayne LaPierre's testimony at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing in the wake of the 1999 Columbine High School shooting.


At that time, LaPierre said the NRA believed that universal background checks were a "reasonable" choice. The group even took out ads in major newspapers that read, "We believe it's reasonable to provide for instant background checks at gun shows, just like gun stores and pawn shops."

One week after that hearing, LaPierre rolled out the same argument that he would use 14 years later to attack President Barack Obama's gun safety proposals -- namely, that until the government prosecutes more background check violations, there is no point in expanding them.

 

And again;

 

David and RLM, he's hiding his head in the sand. He doesn't have an answer so he says, "Screw you". I'd really like to hear an honest answer from him that addresses the questions, but we aren't going to get it from him. He's a coward.

 

UHM? His head is not in the sand! I think you can figure what I said.

 

LOL... Poor Little Joe.. He's gotten quite a beating this past week from the intelligent members of the forum. But, when he comes up with such crazy conspiracy theories he just makes himself such an easy target.

I'm waiting to see what sort of conspiratorial wackiness he's going to come up with concerning the terrorists in Canada who plotted to derail trains. He's probably going to blame Bush.

 

Here's something I'm sure lil joe moen will celebrate:
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/201...s-against-abortion-doctor-kermit-gosnell?lite

 

That's an interesting question Jack and I can bet in this tiny forum the numbers are small.

Still, I think there are a few here (and other places) that do. The right on here probably doesn't but still I think they read.
I don't get as many responses as some because I won't get into childish flame wars.

This forum seems to thrive on those flame wars and it's why I drop off from time to time.
I don't announce it. I lurk as you do but find it a waste of time to even engage in the idiocy I so often see.
When I do come back it's with a reason or the idiocy has just become too much to bear so I post.

Think aboout it. I reckon you've been lurking. I know I have.

I see the same old, same old. How about you?

It's mainly JoeNation, CoinOKC and rlm going at it with an occasional dose of David.

Do any of these guys "hit below the belt"? In my opinion yes, they all do. Still I read what they have to say without commenting for the most part because it's a huge waste of my time.

I recall a time in one of your "incarnations" when you loved to goad people into arguments. Not really much different than JoeNation if you get down to it. Not much at all but it was OK when you did it wasn't it?
Ah, you were so clever and actually you were at times.

Those days seem gone to me LevelHeaded. Soooo far gone.

Honestly I don't have a lot of respect for said "tactics" no matter who employs them.

How about the "shock jock" approach? Fill a thread with obscnenities to get booted off. Didn't work too well but made a statement to any fairly lucid and rational reader.

Hell,
I wouldn't have even responded to this thread originally had I not read this.

I disagreed and stated why. Pretty simple actually. Post #9 sums it up.

Since I joined PRWE (now Partisan Lines) I have changed. I consider myself more a Moderate than a Liberal for one thing. Interpretation is up to the reader though.

I have seen no reason to announce my leaving, change my username or go back and edit posts with a (.). Why would I (or anyone) do that?

Nope.

I remain Clembo. I've always been Clembo. I evolve and my avatar remains the same.

You might honestly ask yourself the same question.

 

Oooo....I was referenced twice by poor ol' clembo...

 

Hey! I got the perfect solution! You gun guys don't mind people running around killing others and you abortionists don't mind people not being born. I say we combine the two and...ahhhhh, forget it. Carry on.

 

Your sentence should have read, "You gun guys don't mind people defending themselves and others and you abortionists don't mind killing babies." Then you might have a point in saying that people with guns should defend babies against abortionists who want to kill them.

 

View attachment 1596