From your link: ...unless you are a republican, or an ignorant non-republican (it's typically assumed a person is ignorant, intentionally so, if the person is a republican).
Bush took over with $5.7T in debt (your numbers). He left with $10.0T. That is a 75.4% increase. That really does not sound like a 112% increase as you alleged. Obama took over with a $10.0T and is now over $17T. Oh, and, the last time I checked all financial bills had to originate in the House. You might find those numbers (on your chart) VERY interesting when they are assigned to the party controlling the House. Seriously, try it!
BO is not the first black president, he is the first bi-racial president. Other than living overseas he was raised in white privilege.
Sorry, forgot you are from the South...He's "the first n***** to steal the White House!" Is that racist enough for you?
Tetchy, aren't we? I would have expected nothing less from you than to express your bias and ignorance in such a manner!
What's racist about stating a fact? You were wrong labeling BO as "black", he's bi-racial (a fact I think he would freely admit). In fact, wasn't it a prominent liberal democrat who claimed BO wasn't "black enough"?
I think 2 things will haunt BO over the course of history... 1) Benghazi 2) Using the power of the IRS against his political opposition Right now, both scandals are being hushed by the WH, with the help of the liberal media, but that protection won't last forever.
Exactly. Skin color is the key factor in determining who racists are biased against and who they aren't. Just ask those people of mixed race who were able to "pass" because they lucked out with the white skinned genes. Having a white mother doesn't make you white, the color of your skin makes you white. Or not. For racist purposes Obama's skin color makes him a "ni**er no matter what his parentage. Ergo,
WOW! Are you slow! Just WOW! I asked if my comment was racist enough for you... ...I'm still waiting on an answer to that question. < ))) republicans ))) ...oy But yeah, he considers himself black, your opinions on his race, and other republicans opiniions for that matter, don't mean squat.
Both "scandals" will eventually be incorporated into the heading: < ))) republicans ))) sub-headings: < ))) idiocies ))) < ))) obstructionism ))) < ))) see "losers" )))
It's really not an opinion though, is it? Simply by "considering' yourself to be something doesn't make it so, does it? You consider yourself to be relevant, insightful, etc but it's obvious you are not. The child of 1 black parent & 1 white parent is bi-racial. Since when did a factual point become racist?