Rand Paul Didn't Stomp a Woman's Head, One of His People Did

If you don't understand that then you are too dumb to be discussing the topic. Go back to school!

 

It was a rhetorical question...I didn't really think you could come up with an answer.

 

I have an answer, one that you already know. If you are going to ask rhetorical questions just to be a pain in the ass, don't expect me to play your little game. Your little play dumb routine is really getting old. Back to more important things.

As you stated, you are wrong!

 

Are you sure that you aren't dancing while you type because you sure are doing a lot of twisting and dodging. That is unless you really can tell us why the distiction matters. My guess is that you can't.

 

Are you really that dumb or just playing that dumb? It is written in English, but I guess it involves economics, so........

 

What are you talking about, you just said it was a rhetorical question.

If you want an answer, then say so! Otherwise, stop wasting my time.

 

Alot of ifing going on in this thread. Hey what if she wanted to give him a rose or a box of chocolates or a kiss? What if you wanted her autograph? What if, what if. They knew she didnt have a gun. Or a knife, or a bomb or a vial of poison. They did it because she was holding a sign (a sign, not a Spy vs. Spy bowling ball bomb)that read Move on. and thats why the guy press her head into the ground. with that kind of character, had it been a gun he wouldve dove under the first car he saw. Or held a baby up for protection. I hear the head stomper is now filing for unempolyment. That must be so conflicting to some of you here.

 

So your point is that holding a Moveon sign is evidence that the person is mentally stable and incapable of having a concealed weapon. I find that logic to be flawed.

 

That's craig for you.

 

Look who is barking now. I see you as the one holding up a baby for protection. You know what was going on in the guy's head. I just made an opinion. But you know. You think he's a hero because he roughed up a girl. Bravo. Did he still think she had a weapon when she was prone on the ground with his foot pressing on her head? Thats right you know. Yes thats exactly what I wrote. I wrote she was mentally stable because she had a 'Move on' sign in her hand. Ya got me. Dont get sore 'cause I'm not playing the ''what if'' game to justify this scumbags actions. Schmuck.

 

You seem quite angry today. Out of your medication, craig?

 

Did he still think she had a concealed weapon once she was on the ground and immobile? In you opinion.

 

I believe once the person is rendered "immobile" that is the proper time to determine whether or not they are armed. You know I like to play around here and get you guys worked up, but in all seriousness, anyone who acts like she did...pushing towards Paul, wearing a disguise...in that setting should expect to be treated like that. The fact that she was that stupid was cause enough to question her state of mind. It's real easy to look back on it now & see she posted no threat but in the heat of the moment those guys did what any reasonable person would expect them to- identify the possible threat, take action, leave no possibility of inflicting damage. If you decide to put yourself in that situaqtion, you should expect the consequences.

 

No David the guy's who actualy took her down did what was reasonably expected of them, his actions were carried out after she had been imobalized There is a world of difference between using reasonable force to protect someone and standing on the neck/head of a downed person If you care to disagree then I sugest you ask a Law enforecment officer what respons they would recieve from there superiors if they behaved in such a manner with the suspect allready imobalized.
As for your assertion that she was in disguise She was wearing a wig which as I asked earlier is not against US law many people do even at political events.

 

Didn't realize I was on a time table bonehead.

 

C'mon, the guy had his foot on her standing there with his arms crossed like Crazy Horse after taking a scalp. he didnt have her arms pinned she couldve easily taken out this ''what if'' gun and blast the douche bag.

 

Craig,

Stop already. Nobody is defending the guy who stepped on her. David's comments are about the two guys who stopped her and took her to the ground. What he is saying makes perfect sense.

 

Who ever said wearing a wig was illegal? I certainly didn't. I say wearing it, as she did, was beyond stupid & she paid for her stupidity.

 

Ah so now one cant wear a wig at a political event without been classed as beyond stupid! why is that David? how about stopping the wearing of hats, they can be used as a form of disguise or how about umbrellas, hoodies etc?

 

I agree with this.