Six Months : Largest Tax Increase In History

Wow, bleeding rear ends, mirrors in bathrooms & urinals? Do I detect a common thread in your posts today tomc (or is it Barney Frank)?

 

.....and grow....hire new workers...invest....and everything else a business needs to do to assure a prosperous nation and stable employment for workers.
What are we going to do to earn an income, tom, if our employers aren't allowed to make a profit?

 

So are you saying you are part of the 53% that pay taxes. As far as my assumptions, they can still be heard until Obama shuts down the internet......you known that pesty little 1st admendment.

 

tom, if you are indeed a tax payer, your tax liability for 2011 will increase dramatically and if you are below that $250k mark in income your beloved BO has just RAISED your taxes even though he promised swore he wouldn't. How does that make you feel now?

 

I doubt you can detect anything that wasn't first broadcast by The Fox noise network.

 

"a profit" is fine. Placing "a profit" at the mega levels thus justifying any and all behavior with profit above all else is another matter entirely. Limitless profit through any means desired is really what you mean, isn't it Spooky?

 

It makes me feel like you have no idea what you're actually talking about Spooky.

 

What does that mean? YOUR taxes will go up, my taxes will go up...everyone else supposedly in that protected $250k and less group will see their tax bill increase. Now what?

 

Somehow I would think that your intrepretation of reality versus what the actual "income" based tax, Presidential viewpoint might stand in contrast to each other. Fox talking points versus the President? There's a tough decision.

 

Can anyone make any sense out this?
Try answering the question, won't you? If BO allows the the BUSH tax cuts to expire we will see an increase in our taxes, right? Didn't BO swear that wouldn't happen? Didn't he make that pledge numerous times? We will await your response.

 

Yes I can. The Bush tax cuts are bad because they have the word 'Bush' in them. Simple, really.

 

This is one interpretation. Simple, true and the correct interpretation, all without having to dig too deep. Keywords like Bush, republican, guns, Hannity, are all dead giveaways that expose the forthcoming associated content. Yes....simple, really.

 

Well, it is not hard to figure out your ideology. It is just like old Midas and his world view. If it mentions Islam, it is bad. If someone is a Muslim, they are bad. It doesn't require him to get all complicated in his thinking. It makes it simple to figure out.

 

I guess that would be like someone mentioning 911 being a major inside conspiracy, that person must be nuts. I understand.
Fortunately or unfortunately (depending on one's point of view), figuring out the lunatic right really is that simple. IMO, and through what I've experienced over my lifetime, there is basically only one thing that drives the majority of the right. Money and the way to get more of it or as much as possible (even if you already have far more than enough and even if it means extinguishing any and everybody else in order to get there). Simply put...RNC=CASH=CORPORATIONS=MORE CASH. When you look at everything from the perspective of those folks being really one dimensional and everything they do is based on that, then yes, it really is as simple as looking for the common keywords and the names of their mouthpieces. The right's content and motivations haven't changed since the 1960's as far as I can tell. Pro-life, pro-guns, anti-taxes and anti gay...over and over and over and over. Watch the moving cup and try and find the same ball. Oh yeah...and the liberal left is bad, bad,bad. Same old, same old.
Again, in case you missed it. Republicanism is rooted in CASH. Nothing else, making them one dimensional and very easy to analyze. Follow the cash, not the lip service. It won't take long to find the republican and their motivation.

 

Tom, the Dems are just as bad. Start looking into the Chicago Carbon Exchange, and how it ties into global warming, cap and trade and the dems.......greed is bi-partisan. You are smart enough to get to the bottom of it, if you actualy care to and are honest with yourself.

You will be stunned like I was when I saw what a pig W was and the rest of the repos.

 

I'll look into that and offer some facts I find and offer an opinion, IF you Jack, willshare some of the facts you discovered during your investigating 911 and expose what you found, and I'll do the same with the carbon exchange. Deal? And be SPECIFIC.

 

I'd say that your posts would be a lot more credible if you weren't so blind to the elephant in the Democrat's room too. But, that would be like telling good old Midas that Christians have done some bad stuff also.

 

Oh yeah...the "They did it too" mentality. I never said the dems weren't often as bad Jack. How's that change the facts that the right is retarded? Consistently, the party of the rich and against the "poorer" level of society...always against the policies that often help those of less fortunate circumstances. Like clockwork.

 

Dude...not quite blind and I've explained this many times. 2 choices. 1 of them represents the mega wealthy whose most recent leader invaded a country based on false pretenses and aiding in the attack of it's own people. 1 of them stinks really, really badly. 1 of them stinks less IMO. 1 of them does occasionally lend a hand to the less fortunate instead of telling them it's their fault and they should just get rich too. 2 choices.
I choose the one that tips the scales, however slightly, in the direction of the "less than rich" once in awhile. Neither are anything to write home about most of the time, but like I said, there are realistically only 2, and one of them unabashedly and boldly represents the mega wealth sector of society repeatedly. Simple really...as you have stated.

 

I might actually buy that if you ever piled on your party the way you do the opposition's party. Just because you vote for them as the lesser of 2 evils would not preclude you pointing out all their evils too. Sure, they would have less of them, in your eyes, but still plenty to post about.

But, I don't buy it at all. It's just a smoke screen.