But, you said nobody primaries a sitting president. You are mistaken. Be a man, Ben and apologize for your mistake.
Oohhhhh I see. You're doing a "well technically" instead of engaging with the obvious actual meaning of what I said. To clarify, I meant it's not something typically done in a serious manner by parties against their incumbents. There was no serious primary against Biden in 2024 like there was no serious primary against Trump in 2020. Hope that helps, I'll make sure to dumb down any nuance or colloquialisms for you in the future.
You must have learned the art of obfuscation from your father. How is anyone supposed to know "the obvious actual meaning of what I said" when you don't obviously and actually say it?!?!? If you meant to say "it's not something typically done in a serious manner..." then why in the world didn't you say exactly that instead of saying something completely the opposite and then hoping the reader would interpret what was going on inside your head? You know, this is an Internet forum where written words are the primary form of communication. You need to communicate clearly and concisely if you want to get your message across. Try it sometime.
Here we go again...now you sound like VPOTUS re-wording and obfuscating and re-defining, and using the sad cowardly Whataboutism elementary school tactic. You simply do it on purpose, because it is fun. I constantly wonder why members take your posts in even the slightest seriousness. I knew another person like this... a Psych PHD candidate. Turns out it was an experiment. Christ, how socially inept does such a clown have to be, to assume such a lack of integrity is self-respect and self-dignity and honor? You can not possibly be ignorant of the Truman or Johnson realities, if in fact you are or were a serious "scholar" of the subject you are blabbering in the wilderness about, or you would not post such Bullshit. That "....not something typically done....against their incumbents" is a very ignorant uttering by any honorable participant in a discussion. 3 other incumbent examples of a sitting POTUS being shanghaied by their own Parties come immediately to mind, but it would not matter at all to you, because you need a daily psychological Ideology Of Division Fix to function, and Partisan Lines provides it. Clown. All you do here is use the members for your own psychic pleasure. Weirdo.
I know you don't expect this from this insincere Clown. It would disappoint me to think you would, but I do know persons in the Amish community that are blessed with patience and forgiveness and the tolerance of the benevolent Gods, when encountering such insincere persons. So.......
There was a time when Ben offered some valid input to this forum. Those days are long gone however. Now, like his father before him, he’s become a disingenuous troll. I seldom give his posts more than a passing glance these days because they are nothing more than anti-Conservative ramblings and anti-Trump propaganda. He reminds me of so many on this forum who have come and gone like farts in the breeze.
We are of like mind. BTW, I sincerely appreciate your response to me and considering my thoughts as worthy of same. I am very aware I appear to be trolling the fellow. I am not. I despise any interaction with this type of personality, and when the person is committed to insincerity, and plays the "I am ignoring your Posts" Card (which is BS because EVERY person that professes that condescending message, is still looking up Sally's Dress in Class), it clarifies the personality fault, by the very fact of doing so, because the person lacks self discipline to follow through, and if the person was self-respectful, the person would not need a cyber control device to justify their position, or engage in reasonable response and dissertation. This is not a child in need of love. This is a Practitioner of the Ideology Of Division. Go back and read every response I have ever made to his Posts. It will become very obvious.
That is over the top recognition .Too much so, and I do appreciate the thoughts expressed. I really do.
_____________________________________________________________________ I guess his point might be that AGAIN, AS USUAL, you made an ignorant statement! Note how quickly you attempted to spin out of it by saying it happened long ago. LOL. Funny how your ilk is willing to back several decades to find stuff about others. ___________________________________________________________________ What can I say that has not been said. Maybe there are more than one ex-plumber around.
Don't you guys get? He is using the CLINTON DEFENSE - IT ALL DEPENDS ON WHAT "IS" IS. I recommend reading the book "Arguing with Idiots." It will help you understand the folks (the ignorant ones) who are not destroying our country on purpose.
This is not an accurate representation, and yes he takes votes from Trump, only since Pelosi and the democrats shoved Joe out.
IDK about that because there is no context to the map you posted from his website. This map mirrors the Newsweek article from the same period showing states that he was on the ballot and ones that he had enough signatures to get on the ballot. Texas wasn’t one of the last holdout’s like you claimed.
