Tim Pawlenty has his own Willie Horton

No sh*t, Sherlock. Brainless pests have invaded this forum in the form of liberals, but they haven't caused any deaths (at least that I know of), but they've certainly roused a lot of rabble. Nonetheless, they have "invaded".

The only point I am seeing is the one on the top of your head. The amount of deaths is not the measure of an invasion. But, I wouldn't expect you to know that.

 

Since your fond of stats

Iraqi Dictator Killed: 1

Libyan Dictator Killed: 0

 

THIS is all you have to come back with??? I didn't think you could get MORE pathetic but you just keep surprising me. Are those two sentences supposed to be some kind of point? Or are you just incapable of making a real point? Please define "Libya invasion". I just don't see it. Go ahead and search your Right wing blogs and for current events on the "Libyan invasion". What a wingnut!

 

Moen, seriously, I don't like to throw around the term "fool" and I'm not yet calling you one, but if you can't see that Obama's action in Libya isn't an "invasion", you're well on the path to being a fool. Obama has sent destructive military forces into a sovereign nation in which to disable its country's administration. Just today he reiterated his plan to topple the Libyan government (Obama, Cameron predict success in Libya - Yahoo! News) through the use of those self-same military forces. His ultimate goal is a regime change in Libya.

The definition of "invasion" (per Wiktionary):

A military action consisting of armed forces of one geopolitical entity entering territory controlled by another such entity, generally with the objective of conquering territory or altering the established government.

But, just in case you're still unclear if the term "invasion" fits Obama's action in Libya, allow me to break it down for you:

A military action (that's what Obama's doing; his action isn't diplomatic, it's militaristic) consisting of armed forces (Obama is using Tomahawk missiles and predator drones - both military weapons) of one geopolitical entity (that's the U.S.) entering territory controlled by another such entity (that's Libya), generally with the objective of conquering territory or altering the established government (that's Obama's stated goal).

Now, I don't know what liberal blog or nutjob you've been listening to who is feeding your head full of lies, but there is a war going on in Libya. These people are playing for keeps. Even little children are dying. It's not some Dungeons and Dragon game or Nintendo video you might have played in your youth. It's the real deal. Obama is very involved in that war. If you don't see that, well, you'll just have to labeled a fool.

 

Iraq was an invasion. Afghanistan was an invasion. Libya was a couple of sorties. You argue the stupidest points in this entire forum. You reek of desperation and rationalization. I don’t know what audience you think you are playing to but I suspect it is the one in your head.

 

Turn off Ed Schultz and Rachel Maddow for a minute and try using your powers of reasoning. You know, that grey matter in your skull that you're so fond of telling everyone is so full of information? I suppose that next you'll be telling us that Pearl Harbor wasn't an invasion, it was just a couple of sorties. LOL. Oh well, dream on in your liberal fantasy land...

 

Rachel Maddow is the smartest person on TV...PERIOD!! Why would I turn her off? Pearl Harbor was an attack not an invasion.

 

Rachel Maddow may be the smartest person on your TV, but she does not hold a candle to those on mine. Maybe you opinion would change if change your mantra - "I don't listen to anyone on the Right"!

 

Where can one get these televisions?

 

Maybe she is in Lollipop Land, but not in the real world. If you don't think Pearl Harbor was an "invasion", then you probably also believe Rachel Maddow is the smartest person on tv... oh, wait...

Here are some pictures of the invasion if you would like to see them:

http://quipster.wordpress.com/2008/12/07/pearl-harbor-invasion-december-7-1941/

 

If you're talking about the televisions where Rachel Maddow is the smartest person on TV, you have to buy those in Fantasy Land.

Yes, it's strange how this thread has gone from talking about child molesters and devolved into talking about Rachel Maddow. I guess one thing leads to another.

 

That is almost like comparing a Rhodes Scholar to a substance abuser, a recovering alcoholic and drug addict, and someone that has been diagnosed with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder....Oh wait, this is exactly like comparing a Rhodes Scholar to a substance abuser, a recovering alcoholic and drug addict, and someone that has been diagnosed with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. BTW Beck ain't the Rhodes Scholar.

 

He doesn't wonder, he likes it.

 

Fixed that for ya! This ain't Bin Laden with an AK by his bed. Khaddaffi is certainly very well guarded and a seal team will have no chance to take him out assuming they could even find him.

 

It's a gift.

 

If clueless Right wingers hate me, I figure I must be doing something right.