Why No Jobs Bills from the Republican House in One Entire Year?

Actually you are incorrect. We just hired a couple of people and my boss is a Repub so a Repub has actually created a couple of jobs.

 

What the House Cons have put forward is basically supply-side nonsense again! Give everything you can from the tax base to the environment to any oversight away to those that already have everything and they might create a few jobs along the way. We've lived that lie since Reagan and they are still pushing it and now they call it "job creating".
It has NEVER worked and every conceivable objective statistic backs this up and yet they are STILL pushing the nonsense of trickle down. That is NOT job creation, it is simply rewarding your wealthy campaign contributors and I applaud the Senate for ignoring more of the same stupidity. Now where are the actual jobs that the cons ran on in 2010? They never intended to create any jobs is the truth.

 

Change your tune much? Your OP says they have done nothing.

Now all you are saying is that they have done nothing that you agree with.

Well, GEE, they ran on supply-side. You really did not expect them to change just because you don't understand it, do you?

 

...and how many has he fired? ...leaving that out? ...How about how many he has failed to hire that applied for jobs? Left that out too.

 

Obama's created thousands of jobs... even after those dumb Republicans in Congress caused a mass loss of jobs when Bush was in office. Obama good, Republicans bad.

 

No, I certainly expected them to keep pushing supply-side nonsense. 30 years of failure and still pushing the same failed ideas does not constitute job creation, therefore, even being unable to pass symbolic bills does NOT constitute job creation.

Your argument is simply that if the Senate had let them continue to drive the supply-side train wreck, they would have created jobs. With all the evidence available to the contrary, the only thing that would have been created was more wealth for the top 1%. You can't predicate a logical argument on what would have been created when there is such a long history of exactly the opposite of what you are advocating.

 

"Would have". That must be the equivalent of "jobs saved"? Or maybe those jobs we created at Fisker? Solyndra? Maybe Evergreen? Oh! I remember. We have more government employees wasting China's money at the rate of $250,000 each.

 

Idiotic statement. If 8 million are lost and thousands are created, it's a net loss. Did you get an F in math?

 

But now it works?

 

Nah! He got an F in History. He does not remember that the Democrats controlled both houses from 2007 through 2011. Guess when we lost all those jobs. Coincidence?

 

Right back at ya nimrod. Bush and his Republican buddie's policies caused the mess, Obama stopped it from colapsing the economy...where'd you learn reality?

 

It? Borrowing from China to pay Finland only works well for Finland and China.

 

Republicans = job loss and an increase in wealth for the 1%... You get an F in everything. Republicans haven't created any jobs.

 

Just how do you expect them to do anything when they control but 1/3 of the power and the Democrats blocking everything in the other 2/3's. BTW, did you notice how well the job losses ended just about as the Republicans started their "control"? Even more interesting, they began just after the Democrats took control of both the House and Senate. Another Coincidence?

 

According to Moen, no president can create jobs. Are you disagreeing with Moen?

http://www.partisanlines.com/thread...nt-concerning-the-debt-limit.3272/#post-56053

 

wahhhh!... wahhhhhhhh!!!... <------(Democrat whining)

 

wahhhh!... wahhhhhhhh!!!... <------(Democrat whining)

 

Right, Republicans have created zero jobs. How are you not getting this? Oh, right... you're Republican.

 

Right, Republicans haven't created any jobs. Not bad for a anti-socialist. If you were Republican you'd still be scratching your head... when the itch is on their ass... they're slow that way.

 

Not Republican, but conservative. And I use facts in stead of slanted history and slurs. Facts have an interesting side affect. They actually work.